Here is the latest COVID-19 illusion that has gone viral on the internet:
An online source from Spain called La Quinta Columna (The Fifth Column) posts a report that alleges:
Graphene oxide, a single layer of graphite with oxygen-carrying properties, that is allegedly laced into COVID vaccines, is the real “COVID-19 coronavirus,”
Because, as the report alleges, all of the major COVID vaccines, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, etc. contain a considerable dose of graphene oxide nanoparticles, therefore these vaccines have spread “the virus,”
Which is why no one has been able to isolate the virus. Because it isn’t a virus,
Which is why COVID-19 results in a metallic taste in the mouth,
And induces the loss of smell and taste via increased mucus secretions, says the report,
Furthermore, according to La Quinta Columna, the flu vaccines also contain graphene oxide nanoparticles, and so will the new intranasal anti-COVID vaccines that are soon to be released,
Which is why 5G radiation from cell phone towers are in full-ahead installation to activate “COVID-19” from remote locations via graphene oxide particles,
Because the electron absorption band for graphene oxide is in the same range as 5G radiation,
And coincidentally COVID started in Wuhan, China where 5G radiation was being rolled out,
Which is why COVID-19 degrades a master antioxidant, called glutathione, in living human cells,
Which is why children don’t get COVID because they have high levels of glutathione,
Which is why the FDA recently ordered N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) from vitamin store shelves, because it dramatically restores glutathione levels.
And graphene particles have been found in face masks,
And graphene causes blood clots that plague some COVID-19 patients who have undergone vaccination,
Which led La Quinta Columna to conclude: “graphene oxide IS the alleged SARS-CoV-2, the ‘novel coronavirus’ that supposedly causes the disease known as COVID-19.”
But this is all circumstantial evidence. It has a ring of truth to it, but falls flat upon careful examination.
COVID-19 preceded vaccines. So, what was causing COVID-19 before the vaccines? (Yes, I know there was just re-categorization of flu cases as COVID-19, and many cases of COVID-19, solely diagnosed by symptoms + an unreliable PCR test that produces pseudo-pandemics are really just a vitamin B1 deficiency induced by overconsumption of alcohol, coffee and tea by an anxious population.)
Furthermore, studies conducted prior to the roll-out of the vaccines showed the prevalence of COVID-19 did not correlate with 5G installations.
Graphene in nasally-instilled vaccines for COVID-19 were experimentally tested in animals, not humans. There is no need to issue warnings to humans yet.
Graphene is not listed as an ingredient in COVID-19 vaccines.
In response to La Quinta Columna’s bulletin, Pfizer Drug released a denial that any of its vaccines contain graphene oxide.
Examination of the ingredients in Pfizer’s COVID-19 RNA vaccine does not include graphene
WHAT ARE THE INGREDIENTS IN THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE? The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine includes the following ingredients: mRNA, lipids ((4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis(2-hexyldecanoate), 2 [(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide, 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3- phosphocholine, and cholesterol), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate, and sucrose
Nor does graphene oxide appear on a list of ingredients published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines.
Graphene oxide doesn’t get a free pass like the vaccines
This is not to say graphene oxide gets a free pass like the COVID-19 vaccines are getting.
Graphene oxide has a dark side.
“Graphene-based materials usually have sizes ranging from several to hundreds of nanometers and are 1-10 nanometers (one billionth of a meter) thick, which is also the definition of ‘nanoparticles’ or ‘nanomaterials.’ Due to their nano-size, graphene nanoparticles can reach deeper organs by passing through the normal physiological barriers, such as the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier and blood-placental barrier.”
But is that good or bad?
Another report states:
“Graphene family nanoparticles (GFNs) can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas (small masses of inflamed tissue), lung fibrosis (scarring) and adverse health effects to exposed persons.
The toxicological mechanisms of GFNs demonstrated in recent studies mainly contain inflammatory response, DNA damage, apoptosis (cell death), autophagy and necrosis (cell death) etc., and those mechanisms can be collected to further explore the complex signaling pathways network regulating the toxicity of GFNs.
Graphene family nanoparticles, for example, pass through the air-blood barrier and mainly accumulate and are retained in the lungs, 47 % remains after 4 weeks. Intravenously administered GO entered the body through blood circulation and is retained in the lung, liver, spleen and bone marrow, and inflammatory cell infiltration, granuloma formation and pulmonary edema were observed in the lungs of mice after intravenous injection of GO.
“The interactions of GO with cells can lead to excessive reactive oxygen species (oxidation) generation, which is the first step in the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, ageing, and mutagenesis.
Due to its small size, high surface area and surface charge, GO may possess significant genotoxic properties and cause severe DNA damage, for example, chromosomal fragmentation, DNA strand breakages, point mutations, and oxidative DNA adducts and alterations. Given the increased exposure of humans to GFNs, the assessment of systemic toxicity in the human body is indispensable in future studies.”
The promise of graphene oxide
This is not to say graphene oxide doesn’t have promise as an adjuvant for vaccines.
Graphene oxide is portrayed as a “novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity.”
Another report published in the journal Nanomaterials says:
“Nanomaterials comprising functionalized nanoparticles (NPs) and quantum dots and nanotechnology-associated innovative detection methods, vaccine design, and nanodrug production have shown immense promise for interfacing with pathogenic viruses and restricting their entrance into cells.”
“Nanocarrier/NP-based delivery systems can generally protect nano-vaccines from premature degradation, increase stability, have excellent adjuvant properties, and may help in the targeted/controlled delivery of immunogens to antigen-presenting cells (APCs).”
“NPs could produce remarkable amounts of neutralizing antibodies against the homologous virus, NPs may be a promising and effective prophylactic approach against MERS-CoV infection (Covid-19).”
Furthermore, graphene oxide has been shown to clear beta amyloid plaque from aging brain cells (lab dish study).
That report goes on to state: “Besides these, nanostructures possess other exceptional properties” which includes “their capacities to mimic the viruses in terms of structure or size without requiring a real infection!” (emphasis mine).
OMG: Doesn’t that say nano-sized particles like graphene oxide CAN be mistaken for the virus?
“Inorganic impurities that are retained in final graphene products can interact with biological cells and tissues, inducing toxicity or causing cell death eventually. The residual contaminants can cause a higher risk of graphene-induced toxicity in biological cells. This adverse effect may be partly responsible for the discrepancies between various studies in the literature.
Graphene may be excreted via the kidneys where it can concentrate and become toxic (animal study).
Researchers report that GO may “reduce lifespan in roundworms.” Roundworms are used in many lifespan studies.
While graphene oxide may inhibit formation of abnormal blood vessels, (a biological process called angiogenesis (an-gee-oh-jen-eh-sis), which is a common feature of cancer and macular degeneration, over inhibition of angiogenesis may impair wound healing.
Graphene oxide needs to be detoxified
The title of one scientific report concedes there are potential toxic effects produced by graphene oxide: “Investigating the best strategy to diminish the toxicity and enhance the antibacterial activity of graphene oxide by chitosan addition.” Graphene oxide needs an attached detoxifier. Chitosan is derived from the shells of shrimp and other crustaceans.
One such natural detoxifier, the red wine molecule resveratrol abolishes the potential of GO to generate destructive oxidation by converting graphene oxide to plain graphene via removal of GO’s oxygen-carrying properties. This suggests, just in case you believe GO is being slipped into your body in some obsequious manner, that resveratrol would detoxify it.
But another disturbing report turns up.
Researchers placed a monoclonal antibody for cortisol on a graphene oxide platform. Cortisol is a stress hormone secreted from the adrenal glands. This graphene oxide platform then facilitated the detection of cortisol levels in saliva samples. Sounds like a medical advancement. But investigators also mentioned the next step beyond that would be “an implantable sensor chip” in the future. It sounds like graphene oxide is going to be the platform for mind control and the “mark of the beast” foreseen in the Bible.
This just in…….. The European Society of Medicine publishes a report that states: “COVID-19 Attributed Cases and Deaths are Statistically Higher in States and Counties with 5th Generation Millimeter Wave Wireless Telecommunications in the United States.”
This could just be coincidence. It could be nothing more than “the tennis shoe effect.” When analyzing what causes childhood pedestrian accidents (auto vs human) it was found that all of the kids who were hit by cars were wearing tennis shoes. So, are tennis shoes the cause of the accidents? Obviously no, they are just involved, they are not the cause.
When we see plant life affected by 5G, then we might have conclusive visual evidence of its toxicity. The real threat posed by 5G are the robots that will be remotely controlled to take millions of jobs away from Americans. A 24-7 robot replaces three shift workers.
Information seen through the lens of our preconceived notions
Reports like this one can be a bit confusing as they are received in the mind of readers with their own perceptions of what they are searching for; of how it jives with their own preconceived notions about the world. We tend to dismiss “evidence” that runs counter to our current world view.
A judge recently dismissed a defamation lawsuit against CNN host Rachel Maddow because she was delivering her opinion of a conservative group (Maddow: “Really, literally it is paid Russian propaganda”) because her show is considered entertainment and she panders to what her audience wants to hear, not the pursuit of facts or truth.
A judge ruled a reasonable viewer would not take the statement as factual. “The context of Maddow’s statement shows reasonable viewers would consider the contested statement to be her opinion.”
I hope this report was at least entertaining.
It has been said: a person has a right to their own opinion, but not their own set of facts.
Today, everybody has their own world view, regardless of reality. A man can be a woman if he decides to be. Once we have crossed that line, how do we figure out what is real? When there is no objective truth, when the individual has freedom to believe a traffic light is red or green, we are really going to have problems.
So much for attempting to sort out any information we see, hear or read in the public forum. Rachel Maddow cannot mislead, or tell a lie. There is no such thing as fake news. Everything is political theatre. We should know better. Right?