JFK news

Hello Lew,

I came across this comment that was made 32 weeks ago below an article on JFK (quote below).  Last year in May, when you published my article on the assassinations of Kennedy and Oswald, one website in France reposted it the next day, and a website here.  In the website here, it was presented as an additional interpretation, and none of the commenters, about five or six I guess, agreed or would even say “silencers.”  None of them was convinced or wanted to say so.  One said, “Who the F is John Leo Keenan?”  He said I had to be ignored.   I don’t like that expletive but I had to laugh when I read that.  In the 1990s, there was a good article that raised the possibility of silencers but without presenting the case, and I read that article after you published mine.  As I shared with you, I only came to the conclusion silencers were used as a consequence of identifying when John Connally was hit on his wrist, and it was an immediate realization then, because it was frame 227 right after the traffic sign and it couldn’t be one of the three loud shots.  Some realization that was.  I felt a natural urgency (the burden) to share this finding about the silencers in an article for you.  I found the website and the link is below if you want to see that.  This is the comment I read today, which I got used to liking (I chuckle):   

“Larry Blong

Oswald didn’t pull the trigger or shoot anybody he was a patsy just like he said they were for 4 men with high powered rifles some had silencers this is all common knowledge now.”

Yet Another Opinion on the Assassination of President Kennedy

The Best of Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.