After the impeachment, Pelosi, Schumer and Democrats will continue to use it to attack Trump, his lawyers, and the Republican senators who vote to acquit him. They will argue its invalidity. They will argue a wrong verdict. They will argue coverup.
Schiff and Nadler will continue to lie. They’ve shown that already. They’ve not let go of the Russia collusion hoax. They will accuse Republican senators of sharing Trump’s guilt and endorsing it. They will use it in a divide and conquer tactic that seeks to exploit the divisions present among Republican senators.
Pelosi won’t accept the Senate’s verdict. She has already argued that the impeachment is not an acquittal of Trump unless there are new witnesses and new documents brought in: “He will not be acquitted. He cannot be acquitted if you don’t have a trial. If you don’t have a trial, if you don’t have witnesses and documentation and that…” She’s saying the impeachment is invalid, in so many words. She, Schiff and Nadler wanted to run the Senate show. What an insult to the Senate. As it stands, her remarks amount to meddling in Senate affairs and jury-tampering.
Pelosi’s lies are big. They are huge. She says the most outrageous things. Her lies are so big, so incredible, that very few Americans will accept them if they bother to listen to her at all. One huge whopper in the linked video is this: “In this case, the Russians are coming. The Russians are coming.” She’s draws a parallel between Paul Revere and the Democrats as protectors. She does not realize that “The Russians are coming” was a 1966 comedy movie meant to poke fun at the fear and suspicion of the Russians.
Pelosi invokes the phrase seriously in order to raise the phony specter of election interference! She said this: “And the President has led a clear path for them [the Russians], once again, to interfere in our election, as they are currently doing.” Does she actually believe this outrageous accusation? Or is she so accustomed to lying that she doesn’t give it a second thought? Are lies simply the lifeblood of politicians?
Schiff is so far off the deep end in his statements that merely to see Trump on the same stage with Putin amazes him and he concludes that Trump must be a traitor who is selling out America. Schiff’s been anti-Russian for such a long time that it’s now in his makeup and it’s helped his career, if you want to dignify his stint in Congress with that term.
Pelosi distorts completely what Trump has said by taking remarks of his out of context. She accuses him of acting like a king, putting into his thought “L’état, c’est moi”. I am the state, she says of him, I do whatever I want. The actual context was his executive power to appoint officials like ambassadors.
Pelosi accuses Trump of being a dictator or wanting to be one if given another 4 years. She attempts to wrap herself and Democrats in the Constitution. Her phoniness is unsurpassed.
It’s true that Trump would like more power. So does she. However, Trump’s larger negative is that he never really knew what sort of people the deep-staters are, and he himself appointed all the wrong people. He made many huge mistakes. He didn’t hit the ground running with his own people. Even if he had, he’d still have made some very big mistakes, the same ones he continues to make.
Coming from Pelosi’s mouth, her accusations of power-seeking ring falsely. If that’s a genuine criticism, how does she then assess all the Democratic contenders for the nomination who have proposed endless government measures that reduce our freedom? She doesn’t, and that’s where her lie and her hypocrisy come in. Democrats as much as Trump and Republicans want more power and they want it to use it to harm us and to our disadvantage.
10:41 am on January 31, 2020
