Recently by David Galland: Why Gold Is Going Higher
Recently, I read a book titled The Good Soldiers that also serves as an object lesson in the disconnect between whats going on in Washington D.C. and reality. It was written by David Finkel, a Pulitzer-winning author, and it came to me via a friend who is going through a stage where she feels drawn to books about war, mostly about World War II. Showing flexibility, her interest has expanded to the ongoing conflict in Iraq the theater of operations that serves as backdrop for The Good Soldiers.
Despite it going solidly against my literary preferences, I dragged the book along during a quick trip to Florida a spur-of-the-moment thing to attend a golf school (I figured it was either that or get thrown off the local course for energetic exclamations of elaborate expletives resulting from my golf shots constantly flying off in unexpected and unwelcomed directions). Out of courtesy if nothing else, I figured Id read a few pages of the book before putting it down and so was surprised when it sucked me in, and kept me in, pretty much until I was finished.
The background story is that the author of the book traveled to Iraq with a battalion of U.S. soldiers sent as part of the surge, then lived with them for the 14 months of their deployment. As far as I can tell, he approached his topic with no overt political intentions rather, he just wanted to document the war as experienced by a battalion operating from a small base in one of the worst corners of Baghdad.
As one might expect, as they departed from the United States for Baghdad, the soldiers and their brigade commander, Col. Ralph Kauzlarich, were full of fight, patriotism, and the confidence that only a chosen people can possess. It was, in their view, a just war and they deeply believed that in no time at all they’d use their superior war-making capabilities supported by the sure knowledge that they held the moral high ground to clean the bad guys out of Dodge and get the whole mess straightened out pronto.
Reality, however, turned out to be significantly different, starting with the fact that rather than being welcoming, the population was overtly hostile so much so that almost every time the soldiers drove off the base (which was part of the daily routine), the locals would try to maim and kill them. And they had considerable success at it.
In addition to trying to kill them, the communitys leaders seemed uninterested in the outreach efforts the colonel was instructed to make, including an initiative to rebuild the sewers and fix the power and water delivery systems in the area around his command. Of course, it didnt help that it was the blunt-force approach used by the U.S. military in capturing Baghdad that destroyed so much of the infrastructure in the first place. Regardless, all attempts at doing good works were stalled and disappointed at every turn, with billions of dollars wasted in the process.
As the book progresses, the author juxtaposes President Bush’s and General Petraeus’ rosy comments about how well the surge is working with the on-the-ground realities. And those realities are presented as raw and graphic as they are with the tops of soldiers heads being taken off by IEDs, or burning to death in Humvees while friends watch helplessly.
So successful was the military and political leadership in convincing Congress and the media that the surge was a winning strategy that, to this day, its acceptance as a fact has become a meme throughout the body politic. Back on the ground in Iraq, however, the daily grinding down of the front-line forces continues apace.
During the period of time covered in The Good Soldiers, the Iraqi insurgent attacks lightened up only slightly but only because the ruling mullah in the battalions area of operation unilaterally called a cease-fire. The resulting dialing-back of attacks on U.S. forces was immediately pounced upon by the military leadership and the Bush administration as proof that the surge was working.
That that wasnt the case became clear the day the same mullah called off his cease-fire and hell opened up. One minute the area was relatively quiet the next, the streets were filled with armed gunmen and snipers, and bombs were going off on what seemed like every corner.
One of the more remarkable aspects of the war, an aspect that largely goes unreported, was just how sophisticated the Iraqi opposition became in their attacks against the occupying forces. Not only did their roadside bombs become murderously powerful so powerful that they could almost evaporate a fully armored Humvee but the Iraqis began attacking the U.S. bases using everything from mortars to rockets and even homemade missiles.
The lob bomb, for example, was created out of propane tanks, filled with ball bearings and shrapnel, with a triggering device welded to the nose, and a rocket on the rear. In one instance, two large dump trucks drove near the base; after tilting up their backs to drop their loads, they revealed rails which were then used to guide a barrage of lob bombs, resulting in millions of dollars of damage to the American base.
By the end of the battalions stay, the soldiers were mentally and, in many cases, physically ruined. One chapter near the end of the book, which recounted Col. Kauzlarichs visits to some of his wounded soldiers back in the States soldiers who suffered truly catastrophic injuries I had to skip after just a couple of pages. It was just too painful to read.
Lessons from The Good Soldiers
There are a number of important lessons that can be derived from The Good Soldiers, including:
- The on-the-ground commanders and soldiers being sent into places like Iraq and Afghanistan have only the best of intentions. Though their reasons for joining up may vary, as they head off for war, most believe their leaders wouldnt deploy them unless there was good reason to do so. Thus when it becomes clear to them just how ill-used they have been that they have lost friends and limbs for no discernable purpose it creates a deep sense of disillusionment. The odds of another Timothy McVeigh emerging from the crowd of returning vets are very high. Despite the U.S. government spending tens of millions of dollars a day in Iraq with the total spent now approaching $1 trillion the mission has accomplished nothing other than antagonizing the Iraqis whose doors the U.S. troops kick down regularly. When I say accomplished nothing, that is actually an overstatement. In fact, other than toppling Saddam, the outcome of the mission has been to create an everlasting antipathy between many Iraqis and the United States, blowing wind into the sails of the most radical elements of Iraqi society. What a mess. The U.S. occupation has turned into a very effective laboratory for the insurgents. At the beginning of the conflict, the resistance fighters were relatively weak but as time has gone by, the natural ability of humans to adapt and improvise has led to the development of an array of inexpensive but seriously lethal antipersonnel weaponry. That these technologies are now spreading throughout the region can be seen in the recent death of eight U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan, in a single blast. Short of staging a scorched-earth form of warfare turning these cities into parking lots the U.S. cannot possibly ever win one of these conflicts. There is no fixed enemy that the U.S. can target with its superior weapons. And its unrealistic that the military can hunt down all of the opposition by going door to door. The U.S. political and military leadership is straight out lying to its troops and to the public at large. It is hard to comprehend why, but I dare you to read The Good Soldiers and come away with any other conclusion. Maybe they continue the tragic farce because to cut and run as we ultimately did in Vietnam is just too embarrassing. Maybe its because they are so effectively lobbied by the war profiteers may they eventually rot in the hottest corner of hell. Maybe its because they are allowed to wage war from a safe distance (no politicians visited the forward operating base where Kauzlarich and his battalion were based during their stay there, and Petraeus only made a single, quick stopover).
Meanwhile, the U.S. continues to bleed billions in these misguided wars, while the soldiers just bleed.
Someone, and probably a lot of people, should be held accountable for this travesty as in being brought up on serious charges and, if found to have propagated lies resulting in the loss of lives and the wasting of hundreds of billions of dollars, sent to jail for a very, very long time. Or, better still, turned over to the Iraqis to punish. Im sure theyd figure out something appropriately medieval.
Why This Is Important to Us as Investors
Given the urgency of addressing the U.S. debt and deficits, the bloated U.S. military budget is clearly the most obvious place to start making cuts that will actually matter. Yet Congress made no such cuts when passing the $690 billion budget requested by the Defense Department doing so last week by an overwhelming margin.
That budget includes another $119 billion to flush down the toilets of Iraq and Afghanistan. Showing that it has learned no lessons, the Obama administration encouraged no doubt by new friends in the military-industrial complex has already managed to spend $750 million in the undeclared war on Libya.
There is a way to use this understanding that the bankrupt U.S. and its allies are doing little more than breaking furniture and making enemies in the Middle East to ones advantage. Simply, unless and until the U.S. politicians muster enough spine to pull out of Iraq and Afghanistan and slash the military budget, the governments massive budget deficits will continue.
And if the budget deficits continue, then the trend for the U.S. dollar is sharply downward (though I remain convinced well see a rally in the near term, a topic well be tackling in greater detail in the upcoming edition of The Casey Report).
That is not conjecture, but the unavoidable conclusion uncovered by a number of objective analyses done on past sovereign debt crises by folks such as Kenneth Rogoff and Caseys Chief Economist Bud Conrad.
To those readers who think that cutting the military budget, or pulling out wholesale from the Middle East, will increase threats to the continental United States, we will have to agree to disagree. In my view, destroying our economy to wage war in the process squandering the huge commercial advantage of providing the world its reserve currency is far more destabilizing. As is making yet more enemies by continuing to lob bombs and kick in doors here, there, and everywhere.
Unfortunately, the U.S. leadership and, I guess, some significant swath of the voting public who supports that leadership are suffering from some sort of mass psychosis (or maybe its paranoia), that actually has them thinking that it is somehow in the countrys interest to continue flinging billions of dollars and the lives of its good soldiers into lost causes overseas.
But dont take my word on the topic do yourself a favor and pick up a copy of The Good Soldiers today. As I cant know where you stand on these wars, I cant say whether or not reading the book will change your mind. But I can guarantee you that its on-the-ground perspective will enlighten you as to the true and disturbing nature of whats really going on, and the futility of it all. It is anything but entertaining, but is very well written and very illuminating.
Meanwhile, use the military budget as a proxy for the seriousness (or lack thereof) of the governments intent to reduce its spending by any significant amount. And, absent any serious cuts in that spending, continue to take measures to protect yourself against wholesale debasement of the currency.
Every month, David Galland and his co-editors among them Doug Casey of The Casey Report research and analyze significant events in the U.S. and global economy, as well as in politics and the markets. Their goal is to recognize the trends in the making that will directly or indirectly affect investors and to provide the best profit opportunities, even in a time of crisis. Learn how you can outpace rampant inflation by crisis-investing like the pros in this free report.
David Galland is the managing editor of Casey Research.