An Open Letter to Sarah Palin
by
William L. Anderson
by
William L. Anderson
Recently by William L. Anderson: Channeling
the Soviet Union: How U.S. Federal Criminal Law Has Reincarnated Beria
In the wake
of your decision last week to step down from the governor’s chair
in Alaska, I must admit to feeling somewhat relieved. Despite the
regular hatefest aimed at you from the New York Times and
the Huffington Post for the past year, you were standing gamely,
as there really was a constituency out there that liked and respected
you.
Even though
David Letterman thought you were an idiot, you wowed the crowds
last year, giving some life to the moribund John McCain campaign,
which before your appearance was playing to a few hundred diehards
at the regular stops. Now, I cannot exactly praise you for accepting
McCain’s nomination, given that McCain is a person for which no
good deed goes unpunished.
You were a
breath of fresh air to the political scene, dominated by women who
have had their shares of facelifts or catty writers like Maureen
Dowd who in saner times at best would have been writing obits for
a small-town weekly in Iowa. Unfortunately, the modern political
times are not conducive to decent people entering the political
ring; look at the abuse that Ron Paul has received (and continues
to receive) at the hands of the media and other Republicans.
(If Paul ever
becomes a real electoral threat to his party, look for every
ethics investigation, not to mention an attempt by U.S. attorneys
to frame him. Being that federal criminal law is little more than
a tool for politicians to eliminate their competition, I believe
that if Ron’s ideas every truly catch on, the government will come
after him with all guns blazing.)
In my letter
to you, I am going to advise you to do something that would be unthinkable
in modern politics: leave the political arena altogether. The United
States no longer is salvageable, and no politician – not even Ron
Paul – can save this country. The original American Experiment in
limited government with constitutional boundaries is over, and has
been over for many years. Like you, the Constitution could not survive
the assaults that were thrown at it beginning in the early years
of the Republic and continuing on to the present day.
Moreover, as
John
Fund so aptly noted in his recent article, the political classes
have so many weapons to use against anyone who threatens them that
one person cannot bust through the system. From ethics complaints
to federal prosecutors looking for a Big Scalp, it is impossible
today for anyone who might be seen as going against the grain.
Now, I am not
saying that you were another Ron Paul. You never have articulated
the kind of understanding of economics and politics that we have
seen from him, and you were the running mate of a man who made sure
that any public support of Paul shown at the Republican National
Convention last year would be mercilessly stamped out. You seem
to have some good instincts, but you don’t have the same solid compass
that Paul and others of free-market orientation have, and the semi-conservative
populism that you seem to have embraced easily morphs into outright
tyranny. Moreover, your support for the disastrous U.S. interventions
abroad demonstrates a lack of understanding of just what these wars
are doing to us.
To a certain
extent, I don’t blame you for accepting John McCain’s offer to run
on his ticket. It was an opportunity that was hard to turn down,
and I understand that it is hard to say no in such a situation.
Nevertheless, you were on the ticket with one of the most despicable
persons living in the Beltway, and Beltway standards of evil tend
to be much greater than they are in Flyover Country, so a normal
politician in the Beltway would look to be one step beyond Beelzebub
in Alaska.
After you received
the nomination for Veep last year, I wrote that you
exposed the Beltway mentality. This was not necessarily
praise for you, but rather I was making the point that the dream
world of D.C. is not going to accept a woman who actually worked
for a living doing something other than writing nasty prose about
others.
You still are
exposing the Beltway. For all of the bleeding heart "we love
disabled people" lies that we hear from people there, the attacks
on your Downs Syndrome child were unbelievable, even by the Beltway
standards. The Huffington Post recently had a short-lived attack
on little Trig that was so hateful that even it could not stay up
very long, and the Huffington Post is a receptacle of some of the
nastiest stuff in print.
For all of
its supposed "compassion," disabled people in the Beltway
are supposed to be seen and not heard. They are useful props for
legislative initiatives, but little else, and most Beltway types
would demand an abortion as soon as it was found out that the child
to be born would have Downs. When one’s mentality is based on the
politicization of all of life, then a human being who did not fit
with the Beltway definition of being human (that is, being left-wing
and politically-connected) thus has no right to live.
Furthermore,
you never will be accepted in the Beltway. While the Democratic
attacks on you were vile and nasty, they were just a small step
below what the Republican attacks have been. As I said before, McCain
is not the Great Man of Honor that is his public persona, and the
ever-despicable Newt Gingrich is making a comeback so that he can
be The Man in the Republican Party. You are not in the plans of
the Republican hierarchy and never will, no matter how popular you
might be with the rank-and-file.
My advice to
you, then, is to leave the Republicans altogether. If you want to
do something useful, rejoin Todd’s efforts for Alaskan independence.
Right now, Alaska is little more than a theoretical playground for
Beltway elites. Environmentalists have tied up most of the state,
turning it into a giant national park and would love to run all
of you out of the place so that no human being except for members
of Congress and the Sierra Club would be permitted to step upon
the Sacred Soil of Seward’s Icebox.
Lest you think
you have a future with the Republicans, all you have to do is to
read the recent
hit piece in Vanity Fair in which many of the sources
were Republican political operatives. Was the piece full of false
information? Sure, but what else would you expect from Beltway Republicans?
(I do find it interesting that the children of Beltway politicians
are off-limits, but it was open season on your kids, further exposing
the naked evil that is the defining characteristic of that clique.)
After it became
obvious that the economic meltdown was going to doom his campaign,
McCain decided that you were the reason he was losing. McCain
never blames himself; I lived in South Carolina when he had his
primary Waterloo in 2000 and can tell you that his strategy for
winning votes in that state – talking down to everyone – was a disaster.
Let me give
you an example. John McCain claimed that it was those "intolerant
bigots" at Bob Jones University that doomed his "Straight
Talk Express" candidacy. It is true that a faculty member there
sent a "black baby" email that was nasty and downright
wrong. However, the vast majority of people in the state were not
aware of it and it played no real role in how people voted.
McCain made
a big deal out of not speaking at BJU because of its "bigotry."
However, just two days before the primary vote, he was the featured
speaker at the morning Sunday school and worship services at Hampton
Park Baptist Church, which is known in Greenville as "the Bob
Jones Church." Furthermore, McCain’s own South Carolina campaign
director was a BJU grad and a member of the church I attended, and
he told me personally that McCain was aware of who went to Hampton
Park.
I asked him
if McCain ever mentioned the "bigotry" lines to his de
facto BJU audience, and he replied that he had not. However,
after George W. Bush whipped him two days later, suddenly the Religious
Right was the Great Enemy of Freedom. So, it seems that McCain was
for BJU before he was against it, when the people there no longer
were politically useful.
I’m including
this tidbit because McCain has done the same thing to you. When
it was apparent that his own bumbling in "suspending"
his campaign so that he could rush to Washington and vote for a
disastrous and ill-conceived bailout of the spendthrifts on Wall
Street had killed his credibility, he decided that you, YOU were
at fault.
From there,
we saw the $150,000 clothing story, the "Palin’s gone rogue"
leaks, and his ultimate refusal to let you speak at his concession.
By then, you had figured out that McCain and his dirty family were
some of the more despicable people you had known, but, unlike McCain
and his dirty family, you did not defame the candidate. By then,
you had discovered that the man has an unquenchable ego that Napoleon
could not have matched, and that his "Country First" slogan
really was "McCain First."
Given that
people like McCain, Gingrich, and the Neocons (emphasis upon "cons")
are leading the GOP, they are not going to let you into the club.
If you ever start making serious inroads into the party, you can
bet that a dozen hit pieces on you in the usual places, fed by leaks
from people like Gingrich and others, will suddenly appear.
It
was not just the Democrats that were behind the blizzard of ethics
charges that hit you after you returned to Alaska, and you can bet
that people like Gingrich will tell Maureen Dowd that you absconded
with half of the state’s treasury and other such nonsense. So, my
recommendation is that you abandon the mainstream Republicans, as
they will reject you just as surely as the Democratic women did.
If you wish
to remain with the Republicans instead of going out on your own,
I would recommend you follow a similar strategy to Ron Paul. He
remains a Republican, at least in name, but he successfully fights
guerilla warfare. Although he is being seen as a Man of Integrity
by people not of the Beltway, the party leaders have been unrelenting
in their attacks on him, yet he remains strong and politically viable,
at least in his home district (despite the best efforts of the Beltway
establishment to defeat him).
In fact, if
you want to stay in the political limelight, I would strongly recommend
that you get to know Ron Paul and listen to people like him, Mark
Thornton, and others associated with the Mises
Institute. Granted, none of them will lay the groundwork for
you to become President of the United States, and that is a fate
you and your family won’t have to endure.
The "law-and-order,
invade the world" mentality that governs Washington politics
today – and especially the Republican Party – is destructive, and
you don’t have to be part of it. If you really wish to both stay
with the Republicans and keep some political viability, then
I would suggest going the Ron Paul route. It won’t take you to the
White House, but at least you will keep your integrity and learn
something in the process.
July
10, 2009
William
L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him
mail], teaches economics at Frostburg State University in Maryland,
and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute. He
also is a consultant with American Economic Services. Visit
his blog.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of William Anderson
|