was recently taken aback when I read this item in the national Libertarian
Party News: Jewish
Defense League leader signs up with LP.
was shocked. They couldn’t be talking about Irv Rubin, could they?
Unfortunately, that is exactly who they were talking about.
Rubin is the International Chairman of the Jewish Defense League
(JDL). I met Rubin in 1972. A political activist friend introduced
us with the hope that Rubin could recruit me into the JDL. I am
Jewish, and did not know much about the JDL, and I was genuinely
am not going to pretend to remember the exact words Rubin and I
exchanged 28 years ago. But I do recall his emphasis on offensive
violence as an integral part of the JDL’s activities. I am not a
pacifist, and I have never been opposed to using force to defend
oneself. However, it was clear to me that Rubin was talking about
going beyond defense. He explained that the tactics of “our
enemies” justify the use of preemptive violence. And he explained
that the hate speech of anti-Semites and racists justified the use
of force, that their very speech was in fact an aggression against
Jews. When he sensed my resistance to this kind of talk, he assured
me that the JDL had many other activities which were completely
legal and political in nature. I declined the offer to join the
1973 I joined the Libertarian Party. I served as a National Committee
member, California State Director, and candidate and campaign manager
numerous times. I am still a life member of the LP, but I am no
longer registered LP. I still consider myself to be a libertarian
with strongly held beliefs and, as Webmaster of Antiwar.com
and LewRockwell.com, consider
myself an activist in the libertarian movement. I still read much
of the LP’s literature, have many friends and associates in the
LP, often even vote Libertarian. I also subscribe to the LP’s internal
email discussion list.
this month Justin Raimondo wrote a
column explaining why he was not voting for the LP this year.
In the column he talked about the LP’s promotion of Rubin’s entrance
into the LP.
key issue that brought Rubin to the LP was opposition to gun control.
In the LP News
article, Rubin stated that he agreed with most of the party’s
positions, except non-interventionism. Not surprisingly, he stressed
the importance of continued military aid to Israel. I don’t think
this is a minor point. Noninterventionism is a key aspect to libertarianism.
To ignore it is to ignore the international application of libertarian
took a few days, but when news of Raimondo’s article filtered onto
the LP email discussion list, what followed was an avalanche of
several hundred email posts, hotly discussing the issue. Unfortunately,
Rubin’s support of military intervention was not one of the main
discussion points. But that aside, many of the points brought up
most substantive point of contention on the email list was the nature
of the Jewish Defense League. Many insisted that the JDL is a strictly
The JDL was founded by Rabbi Meir Kahane, an advocate of violence
against Arabs both in the US and Israel. In later years he was expelled
from Israel for advocating the ethnic cleansing of all Arabs from
the 80s, the JDL was implicated in many bombings and attacks, including
the 1985 bombing of the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee
which resulted in the death of their director, Alex Odeh.
the time, Rubin publicly stated that Odeh “got what he deserved,”
adding “I’m not crying over the death of Alex Odeh.” Rabbi
Kahane, however, disavowed the group and moved to Israel. Rubin
took over as Chairman.
to the Historical
Dictionary of Terrorism, law enforcement officials have
ascribed at least 37 terrorist acts to JDL members:
“While the International Terrorism: Attributes of Terrorist Events
(ITERATE) database developed on behalf of the United States Central
Intelligence Agency by Edward F. Mickolus recorded 50 such incidents
from 1968-1987, making the JDL second only to the Puerto Rican FALN
as the major domestic terrorist group. Nonetheless the JDL is a
legally incorporated political action group and has officially disavowed
responsibility for any violent actions carried out by its members.
Bombings accounted for 78 percent of all JDL terrorist activities;
shootings accounted for 16 percent; while arson attacks, vandalism,
kidnapping, threats, and verbal harassment accounted for the rest.”
addition to alleged terrorist activities, the JDL has been involved
in intimidation and mob violence countless times. In 1987, several
members of the JDL were convicted of violent assaults. Their targets
often go beyond nazis and anti-Semites. Currently on the JDL website
there is a call for fighting against the Southern Baptist Convention
for forming a mission to try to convert Jews to Christianity. They
call the Southern Baptist campaign the “Quiet Holocaust.”
Two months ago, the JDL (along with several LP members) attempted
to block attendees going to a Pat Buchanan fundraiser at a private
house. Rubin brags that he has been arrested over 40 times.
is not difficult to find public positions of the JDL which are clearly
inconsistent with the nonaggression principle of the LP.
favor expelling all Arabs from both pre-1967 Israel and the occupied
West Bank. They further support invading Jordan to take over the
East Bank and expelling all the Arabs from there too. They are currently
involved in a campaign
to get the US to support Israel’s campaign of demolishing Palestinian
homes on the West Bank.
is one of the five principles of the JDL:
upholds the principle of Barzel — iron — the need to both
move to help Jews everywhere and to change the Jewish image through
sacrifice and all necessary means — even strength, force and
response to these arguments, many Libertarian Party activists say
Irv Rubin is just one person, and that the LP cannot be responsible
for the statements and actions of those who join the party. However,
Rubin is not just one person — he is the International Chairman
and guiding light of the JDL and the JDL is not a democratic organization.
Moreover, the Libertarian Party has chosen to promote Rubin’s membership
in the pages of their newspaper and on their Website.
LP activists point out that Rubin has never been convicted of murder
(is this now the LP’s litmus test for membership?).
neither has David Duke. But the speech promoted by both has contributed
to the tensions that lead to violence. And I have no wish to ally
with either Duke or Rubin, regardless of their support of Second
leadership of the Libertarian Party has made a grave error. In their
desperate pursuit of political success at the cost of party-building,
they may truly be sitting on a political time bomb.