Trump says he’s ready to debate Kamala more than once?

Writes John Leo Keenan:

That’s what he says.  Big mistake.  It’s a bad idea to debate her at all.  He debated Biden already, so in debating her (just the vice president of the man he defeated in a debate), he demeans himself and his previous debate victory.  His thoughts should be: “The one who quit was my opponent, not his VP; I offer my VP for a debate with her, and that’s maybe yes and maybe no.  I don’t know if he wants to, only if he feels comfortable; I was going to debate him in September as we agreed, but if he quits there are no more debates; I won the debate by KO.”  He knows Kamala is not a political heavyweight like himself.  Someone in the lightweight division is challenging him for the title (of President) because the main one quit.  There should be no acceptance of a second debate chance through an emergency President substitute.   By refusing to debate Kamala, Trump would be referring to the entire disorganization of the Democrat Party, and saying he’s not there to help dissimulate their disgrace but to warn the country…

It’s Kamala who needs the validation and the platform of a debate with Trump.  How can Trump offer her several debates?  He is not a heavyweight (smile).  Of course, if he “demolishes” her in each debate like he is thinking, it would be good for him – but the thing is that he does not need to debate her and, in politics, if you are ahead, and know you’ll be ahead, you don’t give a chance to the one that needs the debate, and in this case he already debated the main Democrat and defeated him even by this KO.  He becomes part of the Democrat disorganization and collapse by debating her, and if he does not win by KO in the debate, then the wisdom of the A-B-Cs of politics would be seen, and she might even beat him by then.  

The Best of Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.