“Scientific American” Editor in Chief goes Mental Over Election Results

Writes Tim McGrawr:

“Scientific American” Editor-in-Chief Goes Mental Over Election Results: Video

I used to read “Scientific American” magazine every month back in the 1970s and 80s. Somewhere along the line, the premiere scientific magazine rin the USA went political. I quit subscribing as I did with “National Geographic” magazine. It’s sad when objective scientific journals join the opinions of the State and the mob.

The narrator is right. Censorship inhibits people’s ability to think critically. It makes sense. If information is banned, withheld, distorted, and censored in any way, people can’t get all the information. Critical thinking is thus impossible.

I have friends who think we are all being poisoned by our food, air, water, and medicines. Other friends think the masks, jabs, fluoridated water, and GMO food are fine. There is no geoengineering. The government takes care of us. Others think the opposite is true.

Censorship prevents the information about all of these issues from reaching people’s eyes and ears. How can anyone use critical thinking without all the information?

It’s a good video.