Writes Bill Sardi:

As Americans awake on Halloween morning, Hillary Clinton demands the FBI disclose newly found emails it says are “pertinent” to its investigation of unsecured emails involving Hillary Clinton and the State Department.  But an LA Times article asks why Hillary Clinton’s own election team doesn’t obtain those emails directly from the estranged husband of top Clinton aid Human Abedin themselves?  [LA Times Oct 30, 2016]

Ed Klein, author of the newly released book about the Clinton family entitled GUILTY AS SIN (Amazon), reports that FBI Director James Comey bowed to mounting pressure from “mutinous FBI agents” and the mounting resignation letters he had received from disaffected agents in his announcement to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails. [Daily Mail UK Oct 30, 2016]

These FBI agents knew of these email messages that had been recovered in a separate probe may be germane to their case involving Hillary Clinton.  But Comey apparently wasn’t informed of them till Thursday, Oct 27. [Washington Post Oct 30, 2016]

The FBI says the pertinent emails to be reviewed emanate from Anthony Weiner, now separated from Hillary Clinton personal aide Huma Abedin. [KTLA]

It needs to be said that according to Breitbart.com, FBI Director James Comey allegedly accepted money from a Clinton Foundation defense contractor; Comey served on the governing board of a company that donated to the Clinton Foundation; Comey’s brother works for a law firm that does Clinton Foundation taxes.)

To clarify, these are not the 33,000 Clinton emails that were deleted and “bleached” AFTER they had been subpoenaed by the House Select Committee on Benghazi. [Western Journalism Oct 27, 2016]

Those 33,000 emails will reportedly be released on Nov. 5 by ANONYMOUS, a loosely associated international network of “hacktivists” entities [Google] that is visually identified by members wearing a Guy Fawkes mask (who plotted with others to blow up the House of Lords in London on Nov. 5, 1605). [Wikipedia]

Election pockmarked by false rumors

Some of the scurrilous news reports surrounding Hillary Clinton, namely the transfer of $1.8 billion from the Clinton Foundation to Qatar [Snopes.com] and the connection between George Soros and the supply of voting machines to 16 States [Snopes.com] are nothing more than false rumors that are repeated in postings throughout the Internet.  Bizarrely, a petition to stop the George Soros voting machines even captured 100,000 signatures. [Info Wars]  These rumors are swirling around the Internet and making an indelible impression.

Who will sway American voters, particularly the undecided? Will it be federal government announcements (war, false flag terrorist acts, etc.) issued without critical fact checking by the lock-step news media or will alternate news media such as ANONYMOUS and WIKILEAKS sway the election?

For sure, there has never been an election like this one.

• With celebrities on both sides of the political aisle saying they will either leave the country or consider revolution if their candidate doesn’t win the Presidential election. [Townhall; Telegraph]
• With the news media creating all the political drama it can to woo viewers and listeners and readers. (Example: casting chick reporter Megan Kelly vs. Donald Trump the alleged misogynist.)
• With abandonment from the usual reluctance in reporting the Presidential candidates personal lives.
• With the revelation that Hillary Clinton made an offhand racist remark (the “n” word) as reported by a former White House chef. This report emanates from alternative news sources. [The Gateway Pundit]
• With oligarchs and other agents outside the country attempting to sway the election and American politics. (Overseas billionaire George Soros donating money to news media; Qatar donating to the Clinton Foundation while Hillary was Secretary of State- com Oct 14, 2016; Breitbart.com Aug 14, 2016)
• With frequent news reports of voting machine irregularities and other voter fraud. (Example: company that provides voting machines is a donor to the Clinton Foundation. — ZeroHedge; Project Veritas)
• With one candidate in the nationally televised election debate having the benefit of a hidden teleprompter. [com]
• With the health of one candidate in serious question and being hidden from public view. [US NEWS Sept 13, 2016]
• With revelations, campaigns have resorted to low-ball tactics in electioneering. (Example: Hillary Clinton wanted operatives to plant people in Donald Duck costumes at Trump rallies.  – Project Veritas)
• With email hacking By Julian Assange (Wikileaks) and alleged hacking of email by foreign spies. [NY Times]
• With the internet playing such a strong role in this election we see certain politically-oriented websites removed from search engines.

For example, it is reported GOOGLE blacklists many topics. [US News]  Google can also steer undecided voters without their awareness. [Politico.com; Proceedings National Academy of Sciences Oct 16, 2016] A Filter Donald Trump website has appeared. [TrumpFilter.com]  Under pressure, Google restored Donald Trump to a list of Presidential Candidates after his name and photo were missing. [SearchEngineLand.com]  Google was caught by Breitbart censoring out searches for “crooked Hillary.” [Breitbart.com]

• Contact with the Attorney General Loretta Lynch by former President Bill Clinton, who appointed Lynch to her first judgeship. President Clinton met privately on an airport tarmac with the Attorney General, allegedly to ensure Lynch would not use her office to proceed against Hillary Clinton for violations of campaign laws or breaches of security. [CNN] Americans literally watched their country become a nation of favoritism rather than a nation of laws.
• With the release of movies intended to sway the election. (Dinesh D’Souza’s “Hillary’s America”; film producer Michael Moore’s “Michael Moore in Trumpland”; Trevor Loudon’s (New Zealand) “The Enemies Within”; and “A Wolf In Sheep’s Clothing,” a Catholic response to the life of Saul Alinsky, the community agitator who influenced Hillary Clinton’s early years.)
• With massive questioning of the reliability of polls, that claim one candidate or the other is leading by a few percentage points in the popular vote. [The Week] News media polls aren’t even trying to be objective anymore.  They simply remove swing States from polling maps by creating a high 12-point margin to define swing States. [American Thinker]
• With a watchful public eye on last-minute events that could sway the election, even a false flag operation, a staged terrorist attack or even a war, in order to disrupt or delay the election. [com]

It appears the FBI’s decision to re-open its investigation has already produced a change of mind for many Americans.

As Election Day, Tuesday, November 8 nears, it appears undecided voters may decide probably the nation’s most contentious Presidential race.

The undecided voter is said to be young and deeply dissatisfied with Clinton and Trump. [Politico] News analyst Frank Luntz says that young undecided voters can be characterized as wanting a unifier, not a divider; know the system is rigged; crave more choices; weigh character over policy; favor candor; are digital; have not given up on the American dream. [Time Magazine]

Will those Americans who are registered but usually don’t vote come out of the woodwork to cast their vote?

Leading commentators claim this election will be a major turning point in the country’s history. [WHAT IS AT STAKE IN THE ELECTION – Paul Craig Roberts]