Self-Defense Is Not “Violence”

There’s a lot of people demanding the end of violence,” observes a blogspot that Bill Martin forwarded to me. “I am glad the men at Lexington and Concord didn’t feel that way.”

So am I!

Marxists have worked overtime to blur the distinction between initiating violence and self-defense. Now that Patriots are finally, after decades, responding to Progressives’ relentless assaults on themselves, their liberties, and everything decent, Our Rulers—the world’s most prolific war-mongers—stridently demand “peace” (by which, of course, they mean “non-resistance to Marxism’s agenda”).

Why would any self-respecting Patriot heed these enemies of all mankind? Continue countering these unspeakable communists—“violently” if necessary.

Political compulsion (i.e., violence) is all that bullies and Marxists respect (“might is right”). Refusing to understand this is like taking a book to a gunfight: your feeling of superiority dies with you.

Share

11:22 am on January 9, 2021