In a post on Facebook, a well-known Austrian economist and supporter of Gary Johnson speculated that Murray Rothbard would have supported Donald Trump in the current election. His post generated considerable discussion, and I append a few of the comments on it below:
Peter G. Klein Sheeh, talk about a straw man. Murray didn’t think Buchanan was a wonderful individual, he thought that the Buchanan movement was good for liberty, compared to the Bushist and Clintonian alternatives, and he gave detailed reasons for thinking so (mainly related to Buchanan’s far less interventionist foreign policy). People can certainly disagree with this judgment, but they ought to give some reasons. I agree . . . that Murray would likely have thought Trump is far less bad than Hillary (as I do) and that the Trump movement can be a net positive for liberty. Given that Mises made similar practical judgments about realistic alternatives — for example, his infamous remark that Mussolini was less bad than the Italian communists — I wouldn’t be so sure that he would support Hillary, as you apparently do.
6:25 pm on July 22, 2016