Lincolnian Justice

January 29, 2004

Prior to the 1960s, most American historians were truth seekers as opposed to excuse makers and propagandists for their favorite political figures and causes. A case in point is the following passage from S.E. Morison and Henry Steele Comager, The Growth of the American Republic (1942), vol. 1, pp. 699-700:

“Abraham Lincoln was a dictator from the standpoint of American constitutional law and practice; and even the safety of the Republic cannot justify certain acts committed under his authority . . . . A loyal mayor of Baltimore, suspected of Southern sympathies, was arrested and confined in a fortress for over a year; a Maryland judge who had charged a grand jury to inquire into illegal acts of government officials was set upon by soldiers . . . beaten and dragged bleeding from his bench, and imprisoned.”

Ever wonder why you were never taught these things in the government schools?

Share

The Best of Thomas DiLorenzo

Dr. Thomas DiLorenzo [send him mail] is a former professor of economics at Loyola University Maryland and a longtime member of the senior faculty of the Mises Institute. He is the author or co-author of eighteen books including The Real LincolnHow Capitalism Saved AmericaLincoln UnmaskedHamilton's CurseOrganized Crime: The Unvarnished Truth About GovernmentThe Problem with Socialism; and The Politically-Incorrect Guide to Economics