Köhler & Milstein’s Monoclonal Antibody Monstrosity (1975)

Antibodies help protect us – Right? After all, they’re a foundational justification for Vaccines – and Virology.

You may find it shocking but there’s ZERO evidence these “Antibody Entities” exist or function as we’ve been taught.

How can that be?

Mike Stone takes us through the pivotal history with these introductory remarks:

“Like the equally fictional “viruses,” the effects observed from unnatural processes created in a lab were construed as evidence for the existence of unseen entities that were somehow involved as the cause.

“[This is] a form of logically fallacious thinking where the “argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion.

“[This is called] Begging the Question is also called Arguing in a Circle.

“This pattern of logically fallacious thinking is often encountered in virology, and it is clearly no stranger to “antibody” research as well.

Please note this important quote:

“No, there is no such thing as a monoclonal antibody that recognizes only one protein or only one virus. It will bind to any protein having the same (or a very similar) sequence.”

-Clifford Saper, one of the world’s leading authorities on monoclonal antibodies, Harvard Medical School professor

So what’s the real story about Antibodies, how did this get started and why is it particularly important today?

Mike takes through this important, well documented history in this essay, HERE

Highly recommended.

The Best of Michael McKay