Matt Makovi doesn’t appreciate Scientific American’s departure from facts in favor of (their decidedly warped) opinion any more than Vinnie Terranova and I do:
Scientific American … didn’t seem to have any problem with junk science offered up by government workers in the past. I mean like police drug field tests, hair or fingerprint analysis or ballistics. … I had cancelled my own subscription a number of years ago, precisely because of their shift to popular (political) “science.”
Yet lefties are always the first to holler “bias!” when narratives stick to truth and eschew statist nonsense.
5:48 pm on September 17, 2020
