Virologists have come up with various ways in which they can attempt to explain away contradictory evidence and findings that should have rightly falsified their hypothesis.
Instead, virology seeks to confirm the theory rather than challenge it, which is a hallmark of pseudoscience.
Virology allows for:
- “Viruses” to be found within the sick and also within the healthy.
- Theoretical antibodies to be found in the “infected” and not found in the “infected,” while being either a sign of “protection” or a sign of chronic disease.
- The presence of the “virus” within the cell culture determined by both the observation of the cytopathogenic effect as well as the lack of the observation of this effect.
- The same particles seen in EM images claimed to be either pathogenic “viruses” or non-pathogenic “virus-like” particles.
It is clear that there is no way to be able to falsify the “viral” hypothesis when contradictory concepts are ultimately allowed to coexist in order to explain away inconvenient findings.
The “viral” theory is then reworked to allow for the incorporation of the contradictory findings to further confirm and support the unfalsifiable premise.
Germ theory and virology are a circular system devoid of logic and reason that have been deceiving humanity for the last two centuries.
Isn’t it far past time to demand that they show how their hypotheses and theories are falsifiable?
More from Mike Stone HERE.
12:45 pm on April 24, 2023