The Senate Report on Covid-19 Origins Disregards the Most Important Question

Slightly more than three years after the name “COVID-19” was coined for a novel coronavirus that infected the world, we still have more questions than answers. A bombshell report has just been released by the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. The report, Muddy Waters: The Origins of Covid, is the result of an almost two-year, bipartisan investigation into the origins of the COVID virus. The group was led by U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas). You can read the entire 302-page document yourself at this link.

Here’s what it’s all about. From Page 1, Paragraph 2:

Experts have put forward two dominant theories on the origins of the virus. The first theory is that SARS-CoV-2 is the result of a natural zoonotic spillover. The second theory is that the virus infected humans as the result of a research- related incident.

The information contained in this Source Reference Document reflects 18 months of extensive research and accompanying analyses of these two plausible hypotheses. This document was the product of a multi-disciplinary effort by medical, scientific, legal, political, and general policy analysts to catalog open-source (unclassified) information relevant to the respective theories.

Both hypotheses are plausible. The natural zoonotic spillover hypothesis is weakened by the absence of key epidemiological and genetic data from the Huanan Seafood Market. However, data required to support a natural zoonotic source is dependent on information provided by China, and that is incomplete or contradictory. The preponderance of circumstantial evidence supports an unintentional research-related incident.

But wait a second. Read this part again.

...data required to support a natural zoonotic source is dependent on information provided by China, and that is incomplete or contradictory…

We’re being told the release of COVID-19 was unintentional, but the sentence directly before that conclusion says that it’s “dependent upon incomplete and contradictory information from China.”

So, there are NO FACTS that support this. There are only circumstantial, subjective beliefs. The unintentional release is reminiscent of all the other “This is the way it is—establishment facts/narratives” that have been pushed.

Bats.

Masks.

Lockdowns.

Gain of Function.

The list could go on and on of what we were told were facts, only to learn later, were not proven at all. In fact, we discovered in many cases, the opposite of the so-called facts was the truth.

So, in this case, if the opposite of an “unintentional” release was true, that would mean it was released intentionally. And, if the true desire is to sort out the origins of COVID, the intentional release theory must be examined.

And why wouldn’t we look at an intentional release, since everything the system is pushing is the “unintentional” theory? After all, isn’t the scientific method to prove a hypothesis wrong? If so, then why are they not trying to prove the “unintentional” theory right or wrong? It’s merely an assumption they are presenting as fact.

In his video, Dr. John Campbell (who has discussed the problems of the COVID-19 narratives on his YouTube channel) states that he believes the virus was likely to have escaped due to a lab worker selling an infected animal. That would then merge the lab leak theory with the wet market theory. However, is it just a coincidence that the virus was out in the public and surging, as we’ll show later, at the same time the World Military Games and Event 201 were happening?

Let’s take a look at the timeline of what we know.

2017-06 (Genetically Engineered Virus Experiments Begin)

According to the Bulletin, scientists at the Wuhan lab – working on a project under a grant from EcoHealth Alliance – tested genetically engineered coronaviruses for experiments between June 2017 and May 2019. Among the experiments, they joined one virus with the spike proteins of another on “humanized mice” – mice that had human cell receptors. In some cases, these genetically engineered or “chimera” viruses made the mice sicker than the unmodified virus. (Source)

2019-08 (Virus Research Peaks)

According to the Muddy Waters report, sophisticated coronavirus research peaked by August 2019. (Source Page 14, Para 4)

2019-09-18 (Emergency Response Drill in Wuhan for Novel Coronavirus)

According to the U.S. Muddy Waters report:

“Wuhan officials conducted an emergency response drill on September 18, 2019, at its international airport that included identifying and responding to an arriving passenger infected with a novel coronavirus.”

This seems significant. Why would Wuhan officials conduct emergency response drills for a passenger with a novel coronavirus? This, incidentally, occurred exactly one month before the World Military Games kick off on October 18, 2019, in Wuhan, China. The 18th of October is also the same day that the Johns Hopkins novel-coronavirus pandemic exercise called Event 201 began in New York.

2019-10-15 (Vicious Flu Season Noted in Wuhan)

According to the Muddy Waters report, U.S. Embassy personnel stated that

“By mid-October 2019… the U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan knew that the city had been struck by what was thought to be an unusually vicious flu season.”

Eyewitness accounts, media reports, epidemiological modeling, and additional academic studies further support October 28 to November 10 as the window of emergence. Diplomats stationed at the U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan have attested to observations of what they believed at the time to be the early onset of a ‘bad flu season.’ The Deputy Consular Chief recalled:

“By mid-October 2019, the dedicated team at the U.S. Consulate General in Wuhan knew that the city had been struck by what was thought to be an unusually vicious flu season. The disease worsened in November.” These observations were reported to the U.S. Embassy in Beijing during this period. (Source Pg 7 Para. 4)

The important point here is that according to the U.S. Embassy’s Consulate in Wuhan, by mid-October, Wuhan was already in an unusually vicious flu season. That means that before this date, it had been building up to a particularly intense flu season, which doesn’t happen overnight.

It was reported on Page 6, Paragraph 4 of the Muddy Waters report, that an increase in adult Influenza-Like-Illness (ILI) accompanied by negative FLU test results was significantly higher than reported in the previous five years. In other words, there was a flu-like illness running rampant through the population—a flu-like illness that when analyzed, was not the flu.

2019-10-18 (World Military Games Begin in Wuhan)

The World Military Games (think of the Olympics, but for military personnel only) began on October 18, 2019.

The location of the games—Wuhan, China. 110 nations participated, with 9,308 athletes in attendance from the world’s militaries. (Wikipedia)

If you wanted to spread a virus throughout the world, what better way could you find than at a global event hosted by some of the most transient people in the world right before global religious observances? After exposure to COVID at the games, the military athletes would all return to their bases. They’d interact with their fellow military personnel on their home base, then the majority would head home to visit their friends and families for the holidays.

The World Military Games (WMG) ended in Wuhan on October 27, 2019.

What are the odds (just coincidence) that the World Military Games kicked off in Wuhan on the same day as Event 201 (discussed next)? If not coincidental, then of course, the world governments would want a meeting to discuss how to handle the infections that were going to be spread as a result of the ground zero vector of infection at the World Military Games in Wuhan.

Adding credence to the potential of the WMG as the vector for the start of global COVID infections are statements from Mr. Zhao of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA). According to ABC News (2020 SOURCE), Mr. Zhao stated that “…the US Army brought the pathogen into Wuhan during its participation in the 2019 Military World Games in October.”

It is worth mentioning that the same 2020 article quotes Mr. Zhao’s spokesman as saying, “I’d like to remind you that the World Health Organization has repeatedly stated that there is no evidence showing the virus was made in a lab.”

While Zhao lied about the virus not coming from a lab, that doesn’t mean his quote about the military games is entirely false. Perhaps the false part is the part about the US coming to spread COVID-19 in China. Instead, the part that seems more likely is that it was spread at the World Military Games. Could blaming the US be a cover story to shift blame from the Chinese?

Then the issue becomes who spread it? More on that later.

2019-10-18 (Event 201 Begins, NYC)

Read the Whole Article