I appeared on Fox News on Aug 10.
The transcript is here: Steve Kirsch on Tucker Carlson Tonight with Brian Kilmeade.
In the segment, I made a number of claims about the COVID vaccines that I felt it was important for the public to hear.
During the segment, the host, Brian Kilmeade said, “So you know we can’t verify those numbers, these are numbers that you have.”
Interesting choice of words: “can’t.” You mean you “can’t” because Fox won’t let you, right? I love the honesty.
In addition, I was accused of making false statements by Media Matters, an organization where I was an original donor.
I have reached out to Fox News and Media Matters offering to provide them with the data so that they could verify my claims and suggested we discuss the data in a recorded video call if they had any objections at all.
Both organizations declined my offer.
In fact, Media Matters permanently banned me after I made the offer. I think they don’t want to investigate because they know I’m right.
As the Epoch Times has pointed out, Carol Crawford is the person at the CDC who is in charge of illegally coordinating with social media companies to censor people who tell the truth about how dangerous the vaccines are. This is an unconstitutional violation of our free speech rights, but the CDC believes that they are above the law. I said that censorship hasn’t worked and we should have a recorded livestream public discussion to resolve our differences. I left my private cell phone number. She refuses to return my call. Go figure.
I have also made many calls to Martha Sharan at the CDC. Martha is the “gatekeeper” for CDC authors. If you want to question Hannah Rosenblum and Julianne Gee on their Lancet paper on the VAERS data that claims “nothing to see here folks, move along,” you have to get it cleared by Martha. But Martha will not return any of my calls or emails requesting an on-the-record interview with the authors of this paper. So the CDC refuses to defend what is in their own paper. I guess that is how science works: ignore anyone who disagrees with you.
I’d also like to talk to John Su about why he never tells the ACIP committee about the VAERS underreporting factor estimate and implications. This is deceptive because it misleads the ACIP panel and American people into thinking the vaccines are ~100X safer than they really are. Tom Shimabukuro won’t say anything about this either when he talks about the VAERS data. Here’s the voicemail I just left for Tom right now calling him out on the deceptive practices that they engage in. I included a link to it in the email I sent to him on August 12, 2022, just in case there is a FOIA request, this will show up. I also sent him a link to this article which should be very troubling to him. He’ll ignore it of course.
Please email Carol and Martha and by clicking the link and let them know what you think of their behavior.
In addition, later today (Aug 12), I’ll be posting an interview where people will go on the record about illegal falsification of medical records and death certificates. Did you know that in America today, if you died shortly after vaccination, even when there is a VAERS report, that your medical records will not reflect this and it will be omitted from your death certificate as well?
In a time where misinformation costs lives, the people who work at these organizations are not serving the public interest. We need clarity and we need it now. Why are these people so camera shy?
It’s not only them. It appears that nobody in the world is confident that I am lying because I’ve offered up to $1M to anyone who thinks they can challenge me and there are no acceptances of any of my 15 debate offers.
Finally, if you don’t believe me, just read the anecdotes from my readers in the comments. At the time I wrote this, all of the anecdotes were negative. That is statistically unlikely for a “safe and effective” vaccine. That fact alone should be sufficient justification for any news or fact checker organization to check out my claims.
It’s a short slide presentation of the key points.
There is much more information I could add to this article and additional hyperlinks to all the statements. But at this point, it seems to be diminishing ROI for me as not a single fact checker is actually interested in seeing if what I said was true or not. So whether I write 10 pages or 200 pages of evidence doesn’t matter.
I’ve included enough information in this article to show that there is solid data on each of the points and that all of this data would be very improbable to obtain if the “safe and effective” narrative is true.
If I ever hear from any fact checker who is serious about finding out what is really going on, I’ll happily add any missing information requested. I’m not holding my breath at this point.
All the supporting data can be found in over 700 Substack articles I’ve written over the past 10 months and in my presentations such as my Elephant deck.
