In January of this year reports began surfacing that members of the United Nations were conspiring with American politicians to further erode the Second Amendment rights of the people of these United States:
In New York, right here on our own shores, weve got a Trojan horse. They wont accept U.S. firearms policy. They want to take the decision away from the U.S. electorate and undermine our Constitution. ~Ambassador Faith Whittlesey, US Delegate to UN Small Arms Conference, January 2012
While actions at the UN posed a serious threat to our right to bear arms, few acknowledged the legitimacy of the issue and fewer still had even heard anything about it.
The Obama administration is now just a matter of weeks away from joining other foreign powers in the signing of the Arms Trade Treaty at United Nations.
While many will argue that the new treaty will not restrict gun ownership in America, 2nd Amendment proponents disagree and maintain that the new treaty could pave the way for an eventual nationwide gun grab.
Dick Morris, who is spearheading a petition to stop Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and the United States from signing the treaty, explains the inherent dangers within:
Obama is planning, with Hillary, a backdoor move to impose gun control on the United States.
Its totally outrageous. You know, Obama has not pushed gun control during his administration a notable absence for a liberal. But its because he was saving the best for last.
Hillary is now negotiating a small arms treaty in the United Nations The purpose of the small arms treaty is to stop small arms, which they define as pistols, handguns, rifles, assault weapons, even machine guns from being exported to other countries.
What Obama is doing with Hillary is to negotiate a treaty that would allegedly stop individual citizens and businesses from selling their arms overseas. To do that each country would be obliged to set up its own system of registration, and controls, and inventory controls
Its entirely a backdoor effort to force gun registration and eventually bans and restrictions with the act of the United States Congress to do it with international treaty.
One of the deadly parts about this is that when a treaty is signed and made binding in the United States it acquires the force of a Constitutional Amendment. Under the Supremacy Clause, every Congress and every state legislature has to honor that treaty, unless a Constitutional Amendment is passed to the contrary or unless all the other signatories let the U.S. out of the treaty.
So this would be permanent, long-term gun control all done without Congress.