Economists
are among the noteworthy proponents of the "legalization"
of narcotic drugs, cocaine and marijuana. However, public proclamations
have been few in number, short on details, and muted by recommendations
such as Gary Becker from the University of Chicago who advocates
legalization combined with a heavy "sin" tax to discourage
use.
To further
investigate the views of economists I have conducted two surveys.
The first one involved a random selection of economists while
the second examined what economists have written on the subject
of drug policy. The first survey found that economists supported
legalization, liberalization, and decriminalization much more
than the general population, but not much more than their demographic
cohort of highly educated individuals.
In
the second survey, academic journals, books, and other sources
were combed for explicit policy recommendations regarding the
market for illegal drugs. Here the overwhelming majority of economists
concluded that drug policy should be liberalized to some extent.
The results represent the broad spectrum of economists, but are
heavily weighted to the Austrian, Chicago, and Public Choice schools
of economic thought. In looking for those who recommended radical
legalization, the number of supporters shrank significantly and
was largely confined to the members of the Austrian school.
You
can read the full report and all the quotes on drug policy online.
This
article appears in the inaugural issue of Econ
Journal Watch, which was established and edited by Daniel
Klein. I would describe the journal as Austrian-leaning and of
interest to anyone who follows developments in academic economics
and economic policy.