All About Lying
by
William L. Anderson
When
James Comey, the U.S. Attorney for Southern New York announced his
office’s indictment of Martha Stewart last May, he declared that
the case was "all about lying." Of course, Comey was referring
to Stewart’s actions after federal investigators announced that
they were looking into whether or not she had committed the "crime"
of insider trading.
(I
have written about Stewart's indictment in three other articles,
one
dealing with insider trading, one on the case itself, and another
about the sorry mainstream media coverage of Stewart. For those
not familiar with my position here, I simply will say that the Stewart
case is a judicial abomination and she should never have been charged
in the first place.)
My
article here does not deal with Stewart, but rather with her nemesis
Comey, whose very utterances at the announcement of the Stewart
indictments has turned out to be quite prophetic. Indeed, those
who understand modern federal criminal law also know that it truly
is "all about lying." The only problem is that the bulk
of the lying is done by the feds themselves, Comey included.
A
recent case in New York City well illustrates my point. Last May,
when his office was not obsessed with imprisoning Martha Stewart
and destroying her company, Comey’s people were involved in a botched
raid. Thinking they were about to discover a huge cache of arms
and drugs, instead a "task force" of local and federal
"law enforcement" agents burst into the apartment of an
elderly man.
To
counter the "threat" posed by the frail figure who used
a walker to get around, the raiding party used stun grenades after
breaking down the door, and threw the old man onto the floor before
handcuffing him. It was the typical scene of bravado, arrogance,
and swagger that those sickeningly familiar with these "law
enforcement" raids have come to expect.
However,
there was only one problem; it seems that Comey’s office had acted
off a very bad tip and had burst into the wrong apartment. Since
it was Comey’s staff that had obtained the search warrant, his office
– and ultimately Comey – is responsible for the fiasco.
Fortunately,
the elderly man survived the attack. In the investigation that has
followed, however, we find that there is plenty of lying, covering
up, and outright stonewalling, all of it coming from the U.S. attorney’s
abode. According to a newspaper account, the finger pointing goes
as such:
The
federal agents from the Justice Department said that the mistake
was entirely the product of police information, although the police
say it was the federal agents who came up with Mr. Brockman's
apartment number at the last minute.
A
spokesman for prosecutors in the office of United States Attorney
James B. Comey said they were not allowed to discuss what, if
anything, they knew about major discrepancies in the evidence
when they asked a federal magistrate for permission to knock down
the door to Mr. Brockman's home.1
In
other words, no one from the federal government – which was ultimately
responsible for this terrible fiasco – will admit to any wrongdoing.
Furthermore, no one from the U.S. attorney’s office will even discuss
this case at all. To put it another way, the federal agents are
given legal privileges that no private individual can ever have.
What
Comey is doing would be called obstruction of justice if he were
pursuing a case against someone else. When Comey does it, however,
it is just a regular course of business with the feds.
Lying
has become deeply engrained in the culture of federal law enforcement
and prosecution. It is the rule, not the exception. In 1998, the
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
published a shocking 10-part series on the very dark side of
federal law enforcement. Wrote series author Bill Moushey:
Hundreds
of times during the past 10 years, federal agents and prosecutors
have pursued justice by breaking the law.
They
lied, hid evidence, distorted facts, engaged in cover-ups, paid
for perjury and set up innocent people in a relentless effort
to win indictments, guilty pleas and convictions, a two-year Post-Gazette
investigation found.
What
really was instructive about this series was not just the horribly
depressing information that Moushey and his staff found during the
investigation, but the government’s response. Eric Holder, who then
was Janet Reno’s top assistant in the Clinton Department of Justice,
had refused to answer any questions Moushey asked him during the
investigation.
After
the series was published, however, Holder wrote an angry letter
to the paper. While accusing the reporter of committing errors and
giving a false picture of federal prosecution and law enforcement,
Holder then noted that in many of those cases, government agents
investigated those involved and – Surprise, surprise! – found no
evidence of wrongdoing. In other words, the government investigated
the government and found that the government to be innocent of all
charges.
Moushey
had hard evidence and anyone who reads the series soon finds out
this is not just another typical mainstream "investigative"
report characterized by sloppiness, innuendo, and "anonymous"
sources (usually from the government). Moreover, the federal courts
all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court have ruled that it is quite
legal for federal agents and prosecutors to lie as long as the courts
don’t believe that the lies influenced the outcome of the cases.
For
example, while hearsay evidence has long been excluded in
state courts due to the fact that it opens the floodgates to perjury,
hearsay is permissible (only for the prosecution) in federal cases
if the prosecutors deem them to be "statements of interest."
Thus, a defendant is forced to sit in the dock while hearing false
testimony prejudicial to his or her case and can do absolutely
nothing about it.
So,
yes, Comey is correct. It truly is "all about lying."
Lies by Comey, lies by his underlings, lies everywhere. He is a
prophet in his own time, but does not realize that he prophesizes
against himself. It is too bad that the system is set up so that
he is invulnerable, not matter what he does or says. But, that is
the state of federal law enforcement in the United States today
and there is nothing, absolutely nothing, that decent people can
do about it except to tell others.
The
destruction of genuine law – in the sense of the law being a shield
to protect innocent people – is almost complete in the federal system.
When one finds himself in the crosshairs of federal investigators,
it becomes almost impossible to get out without serious harm, either
to his family, finances, or health. The "shield" that
great men like William Blackstone painstakingly helped erect to
protect the people has become a weapon that is used against the
innocent. Thus, in the end, the law itself becomes the biggest lie
of all.
- "Police
Raid Gone Awry: A Muddled Path to the Wrong Door," by
Jim Dwyer, The New York Times, June 29, 2003.
June 27, 2003
William
L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him
mail], teaches economics at Frostburg State University in Maryland,
and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
William
Anderson Archives
|