Charlie Kirk Assassination Points to Israel Not Tyler Robinson

—–

Writes Ginny Garner:

Lew,

Judge Andrew Napolitano asked ballistics expert and former CIA analyst Larry Johnson about the Charlie Kirk assassination on September 10, 2025. A summary of Johnson’s comments: The recent disclosure by the ATF that the bullet fragment as reported in Kirk’s autopsy didn’t match the rifle held in evidence means Tyler Robinson, accused of murdering Kirk with a 30-06 bullet, could not be the killer. As many gun enthusiasts conclude, a 30-06 would have blown the back of Kirk’s head off. The FBI’s showing up at the Utah hospital and preventing a surgeon from reentering the operating room was a huge red flag. The FBI knew in advance the assassination was going to happen. Robinson had never been to the UVU campus before and could not have made the shot without doing reconnaissance. Candace Owens has done remarkable work on this case and TPUSA’s responses have been unsatisfactory. The local police were incompetent and Tyler’s hands and cheek were not tested for gun residue. Some special ammo was used to murder Kirk. Joe Kent was stopped by FBI Director Kash Patel when former National Counterterrorism Center Director Kent wanted to investigate leads involving possible foreign involvement in the murder. Bibi Netanyahu denied Mossad was involved within an hour of the assassination. Charlie had announced he had repeatedly turned down Zionist money, he was leaving the pro-Israel cause, and fervently lobbied Trump not to start a war with Iran, making him a marked man.

The Best of Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.