The Dynasty That Changed the World
Next part
January 19, 2026
In this part, we address the period from 1945 to 1963. As we have explained on other occasions, we seek to understand how a family dynasty, a small group of linked families, control almost all global events. Without their knowledge, it is impossible to understand what is happening globally. This oppressive system, which distances us from our nature as free beings in peace, was born centuries ago and today reaches its maximum development in the project of global governance.
We had concluded the seventh part in 1945, after the end of World War II, an event of fundamental importance in human history. This moment marked the establishment of a new world order, represented by the creation of the United Nations, a central project in global events and in the consolidation of a world government. This concept was not new; it was part of an ancient plan of the Rothschild family, which had begun and failed at the end of World War I with the League of Nations. In fact, its antecedents go back even to the Congress of Vienna in 1812. Ultimately, it is a series of attempts to establish a supranational government, such as the one the UN represents today, which exercises significant control over our lives.
For example, when a global pandemic is announced, the United Nations immediately issues an order that must be followed by the health ministries of all countries, including ours. Due to the agreements signed, these ministries are obliged to comply with those instructions; otherwise, they face sanctions, such as the suspension of loans, the reduction of technical assistance, the withdrawal of military aid, and other measures. In short, compliance becomes an unavoidable obligation. This is just one of the many examples I could offer about the actions of the Nations, or the educational system, or the military system, and other similar areas. Let us move on, as a series of events of great importance await us.
In 1947, the British, who before World War II had declared that they would not allow further Jewish immigration to Palestine, were participating in a central process within global governance and the establishment of a global government. Within that context, the creation of the State of Israel and, especially, the control of Jerusalem, constitute a fundamental part of the project of global domination. Why is this important? Because their goal is to establish a world government, and Jerusalem, by definition, is a city that, according to Jewish tradition, was chosen by Yahweh, the God of the Jews, as a sacred place for his people. The struggle to control that territory is not accidental; it reflects a global conflict for a place of great spiritual and symbolic significance, in a conflict that has deep implications in the vision of a world order.
Therefore, the English had the responsibility of protecting both the Palestinians and their own British soldiers residing in the area, against an Israeli armed group. Eventually, they decided to transfer control of Palestine to the United Nations. In other words, what did England do? It shed itself of the problem and handed it over to the United Nations. Resolution 181 of 1947 was a crucial moment.

That United Nations resolution divided Palestine into two states. In the next slide, we will see an image that better illustrates this division, expanding it for greater understanding.
It is fundamental to understand that the process of controlling that entire Palestinian region is crucial for understanding world events. In a short time, you will witness events that will leave you astonished in that area. Remember that there was an agreement between the Rothschild family and the government of England, through which they sought to involve the United States in World War II in exchange for ceding a part of the territories in Palestine.
This land, approximately 1300 years ago, belonged mainly to the Palestinians. At that time, mainly Palestinians lived there, with a small minority of Jews, who represented barely 6%. However, the Jewish presence at that moment was considered totally illegitimate, since they had no legitimate rights over the land, but were there simply to fulfill an agreement and a promise. Let us recall the Balfour Declaration, which we mentioned in previous chapters: a commitment by the British government to support the creation of a Jewish national home in Palestine, in response to a promise made to the United States, which had entered the war. According to that agreement, Palestine would be divided into two states: one Zionist and one Arab, with Jerusalem under international administration to guarantee access and respect for all religious faiths. This transfer of the land and the implementation of Resolution 181 were scheduled for May 15, 1948.
In reality, the United Nations had no legitimate right, no law or anything that supported them, to hand over the properties to the Jews. They only owned 6% of Palestine at that time. However, the resolution decided that Israel was going to be given 57% of the land, leaving the Arabs, who until then owned 94%, with only 43%.
In this image, you can see the evolution of the situation in the region over the last decades. All the maps represent the same area. The first map, from 1946, shows all the territory of Palestine in green, inhabited mostly by Palestinians, with 6% occupied by Jews. In 1947, in the second column, that area is distributed, and the United Nations assigns 47% of the territory to the Jews, which shows a significant reduction of Palestinian territory.

Then, a constant process of occupation of Palestinian lands is observed. The map covering the period from 1949 to 1967, marked by the Six-Day War, reflects how the Jewish advance, represented in white, continues to reduce Palestinian territory. By the year 2000, the map shows how the land has been even more displaced, and in the current situation, the situation is even worse: practically all the land has been appropriated by the State of Israel, leaving the Palestinians in an extremely reduced area.
This process not only reflects an imperialist occupation strategy but also largely explains the rebellion of the Palestinians and many of the recent events in international politics.
Perhaps, if you are reading this chapter for the first time, you may not clearly understand how this affects your life. However, that conflict and that decision by the Zionists to influence the United Nations, an organization they helped to found, are of fundamental importance. Let us remember the Treaty of Versailles, where, through the Rothschilds and other actors, the creation of the League of Nations was decided. Today, that conflict continues to be the center of global attention and, from there, the Third World War is expected to emerge, as well as a series of events that will mark a profound change in the history of humanity.
During the spring of 1948, the Rothschilds bribed President Harry S. Truman, who was then the 33rd President of the United States, to get him to recognize Israel as a sovereign state. According to the accounts, they gave him two million dollars on his campaign train, thus securing the official declaration. In less than half an hour, Truman proclaimed that the United States would be the first nation to recognize Israel, and in that same act the flag of the new state was unveiled.
On April 19, 132 Jewish terrorists from Irgun and Stern, led by the future Prime Minister of Israel, Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang, led by the future Israeli Prime Minister, Yitzhak Shamir, massacred 200 people in Deir Yassin.
After the creation of the Jewish State on May 15, Israel launched an attack with loudspeakers warning the Arabs that they must flee or be sacrificed. As a consequence, 800,000 Arabs fled, many without their documents, and asked for help from Arab countries, which did not intervene. The Jews now controlled 78% of Palestine, instead of the 57% assigned by the UN. The Palestinians, mostly Christians, did not receive compensation for their properties and ended up in refugee camps, losing even their birth certificates. Israel then passed a law that only allowed those who could prove citizenship to return, leaving out some 400,000 Palestinians who lost their property.
The flag in question showed a blue version of the Rothschilds’ “Red Hexagram Shield,” a symbol that generated great controversy and rejection among many Jews. These people saw in it a connection to ancient mystery religions and symbols associated with Elohim such as Moloch, Baal, and Astaroth, falsely considered “demons” today in various occult traditions.
Many associate this symbol with something negative and demonic, but this has a logical explanation that starts in the Middle Ages. I do not know if there is a direct historical relationship between the hexagram (six-pointed star) and any Elohim; there are no records. Could there have been? We do not know. The hexagram has diverse origins in sacred geometry; it is a very ancient symbol represented on objects and places of worship of all religions. It is a symbol known to the Sumerians long before the appearance of the Hebrews, just as it was also known in ancient Egypt, India, China, and South America. In Judaism, it was consolidated as the Star of David (Magen David), a symbol of identity and protection.
The choice of an ancestral symbol such as the hexagram, which has been used in esoteric and religious contexts throughout history, was interpreted by some as a symbol linked to mystery rituals and the occult elite that would be behind certain international movements. The use of this symbol on the flag of Israel, therefore, generated intense debate about the hidden and symbolic implications in the formation of the State and in national identity.
And this power game is absolutely transcendent because many of the difficulties you have in life and that you have in your country are related to this process of world governance, with those immense, phenomenal transfers of money from your country to international financial banking.
We could talk about what Einstein thought along with a group of the 25 most prestigious Jewish scientists in the world when they wrote an extensive letter to the New York Times about all these issues related to the founding of the State of Israel and so on. But the focus of this series has to do with the use of the financial, economic, industrial, political, and also military power of the Rothschild dynasty.
On October 1, 1949, Mao Tse Tung proclaimed the founding of the People’s Republic of China in Tiananmen Square, Beijing. As I have explained to you on several occasions, the existence of a revolutionary movement, of a country or sector that decides to undertake a war, can only be understood from the perspective of financing. That is, there is always someone who provides the necessary resources: weapons, food, clothing, and transport. There is no other way to sustain a conflict of that magnitude.
For example, in the case of a country, it cannot immediately allocate funds from its annual budget to the war, since those resources are allocated to other activities. The solution is to incur debt, and in that process international banking intervenes, financing both sides of a conflict. History has clearly shown this: during World War II, for example, banking financed both the Nazis and the Allies.
The same happened with Mao and the Chinese Revolution. The only way to understand that history is through the analysis of financing, which came, to a large extent, from international banking, including the Rothschilds, who have played a fundamental role in the creation and financing of movements and political systems, including communism. The real history, the one that can be found in independent sources, reveals that these events were possible thanks to the intervention of these financial agents, rather than being simply the result of internal or spontaneous processes.
This declaration by Mao was financed by the Rothschilds, who had created communism in Russia, and also by the following Rothschild agents: Solomon Adler, a former US Treasury official who was a Soviet spy, Israel Epstein, son of a Jewish Bolshevik imprisoned by the Tsar of Russia for attempting to foment a revolution there, and Frank Coe, a senior official of the IMF owned by the Rothschilds.
Copyright © Madge Waggy
