Democrats Don’t Transfer Power Peacefully

After the inauguration of President George W. Bush on January 20, 2001, many new White House aides excitedly showed up for work the next day only to find their office spaces vandalized and trashed.  Phone cords were ripped from walls.  Bathrooms were littered and disgusting.  Mirrors were broken.  Chair backs were missing.  Desk drawers were covered in glue.  Desk locks were destroyed.  The “W” keys were removed from computer keyboards.  This was the Democrats’ idea of a “peaceful transfer of power.”

Oh, President Clinton’s staffers had their reasons.  After Vice President Al Gore decided to renege on his election night concession to President-Elect Bush, he created the conditions for irreparable national division.  Gore sought to litigate the election before sympathetic judges who might allow him to include disputed votes only from Democrat strongholds in the battleground state of Florida.  Eventually, the Supreme Court stepped in and shattered Democrats’ hopes of overturning the 2000 election with selective recounts (a strategy that has subsequently proved more successful).  Ironically, American voters had not been particularly enthusiastic about either Bush or Gore before the election, but the month-long electoral chaos produced rank bitterness that endures to this day.  (A reasonable person might wonder, then, why so little has been done in the following quarter-century to shore up public faith in election outcomes.) The Great Divorce Lewis, C. S. Best Price: $4.28 Buy New $6.69 (as of 08:46 UTC - Details)

So the outgoing employees of the Clinton-Gore White House were not happy about having tasted judicially delivered victory only to see triumph slip away on December 13.  Because their feelings were hurt, they behaved petulantly.  They recorded obscene voicemails for their Republican replacements, graffitied the West Wing with images of President Bush as a chimpanzee, and filled desk drawers and filing cabinets with vulgar notes — including “GET OUT,” “Hail to the thief,” and “W happens.”

Apparently, Clinton’s people even stole several antique doorknobs and an official presidential seal.  Perhaps emulating Bill’s treatment of the Oval Office as a whorehouse for chasing interns and Hillary’s treatment of the West Wing as a warehouse for “free” furniture, the Clinton administration relinquished power with all the class of base animals, thieves, and scoundrels.  As former Georgia congressman Bob Barr concluded, Democrats “disgraced not just themselves but the institution and the office of the presidency as well.”  Not surprisingly, there were no prosecutions.

At the time, the behavior of the Clinton-Gore Zoo seemed appalling.  President Bush did his best to ignore it, and Clinton loyalists pretended that nothing untoward had happened.  Up-and-coming New York congressman Anthony Weiner called the widespread reports of vandalism untrue and demanded that the Bush administration apologize to the Clintons.  A man devoid of character, Weiner later went to prison for sending sexual messages to a child.  He lied about that crime, too.

Perhaps because nobody held the Democrats responsible for undermining the peaceful transfer of power in 2001, Democrats were emboldened to do even worse in 2017.  It was not enough for President Obama, FBI director Comey, and CIA director Brennan to conspire with Hillary Clinton to frame Donald Trump as a Russian agent, so that they could illegally spy on his campaign and deflect from Hillary’s criminal mishandling of top-secret information.  In order to cover up their own crimes, Obama and his subordinates went out of their way to blame Hillary’s loss on Vladimir Putin.  In the space between Trump’s election and his inauguration, the Obama administration accused Russia of election interference, kicked out Russian diplomats, and fueled anonymous reports in the press that President Trump’s assumption of office was illegitimate and that his loyalties to the United States were suspect.  It took most of the next four years — including a two-year special counsel investigation — to clear Trump of wrongdoing and expose the Clinton campaign as the instigator behind the Russia collusion hoax.  The Obama administration knew all along. Cues: Master the Secre... Van Edwards, Vanessa Best Price: $13.48 Buy New $16.00 (as of 03:51 UTC - Details)

If the corporate news media acted as a “free press” instead of as a Democrat-aligned “State press,” the Clinton-Obama–Intelligence Community operation against Donald Trump would have been the biggest American political scandal of the twenty-first century.  The Clinton campaign paid a British spy to create a fraudulent dossier that framed Donald Trump as a Russian asset.  The FBI and CIA knowingly used that fraudulent dossier to justify widespread illegal surveillance of Trump and his closest associates.  Hillary then used the Obama administration’s fraudulently predicated national security (and criminal) investigation into Donald Trump to advance the lie (including during their nationally televised debates) that Trump was Putin’s “puppet.”

Whether or not the Watergate scandal was serious enough to justify the forced resignation of President Nixon (he had just won a landslide re-election, after all), it pales in comparison to what the Obama administration did to Donald Trump.  Most importantly, President Nixon never tried to cover up the Watergate break-in by blaming the Soviet Union.  Not only did the Democrats use America’s intelligence apparatus to spy on Donald Trump in 2016 but also they inflamed tensions with Russia by laying their crimes at Putin’s feet.  On their way out the door, President Obama and his closest advisers essentially accused Russia of stealing the presidential election for Donald Trump — a “crime” that John McCain and many others described as an “act of war.”  Obama and Clinton pushed America closer to war with nuclear Russia — so that Hillary, Obama, and the Democrat party could save face.  So much for the “peaceful transfer of power” in 2017!

Read the Whole Article