Are the Covid Yarns Slowly Beginning to Unravel?

It has been three years since COVID-19 entered the scene. It probably emerged in the previous year based on COVID antibodies found in banked blood from the fall of 2019 and a severe non-influenza respiratory illness sweeping through ICUs in the early winter of 2019. In those days it was simply called the Chinese coronavirus, based on the reported origin but we still don’t know that for sure.

In fact, much of what we have been told about COVID over the past three years has turned out to be “misinformation”, as government, corporate media, and big tech described everything that went against their preferred COVID narrative. Who are the real deniers?

Start with the origin of the Chinese coronavirus, initially said to have definitively originated in a Wuhan market due to a chance encounter of a bat with a pangolin. The latter supposedly ended up on someone’s dinner table, the virus making a miraculous leap from bat to pangolin to human in record time with no intermediate hosts or time to mutate.

In fact, the virus was likely man-made, manufactured via gain of function research which Dr Anthony Fauci adamantly denied. Such research is illegal in the US but not elsewhere in the world. “The Pentagon reportedly controls bioweapons labs in some 25 different countries including Ukraine.” What are they doing in those labs? Will the Republican-controlled Congress ask

Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland told a Senate committee, “Ukraine has biological research facilities.” Could have that been a factor in Putin’s Ukraine invasion? The media and Congress are incurious.

Recently released Project Veritas undercover videos captured Pfizer executive Dr. Jordon Trishton Walker unraveling some COVID yarns. When asked, “So, Pfizer ultimately i

s thinking about mutating COVID?” he replied, “Well, that is not what we say to the public. No.” That sure sounds like gain of function, or as the Pfizer executive euphemistically called it, “directed evolution”.

Project Veritas screen grab

He went on,

Well, you’re not supposed to do gain-of-function research with the viruses. They rather we not, but you do things like selected structural mutations to try to see if you could make it more potent. So, there is research ongoing about that. I don’t know how that’s going to work. There better not be any more outbreaks because, like, Jesus Christ.

His one note of caution,

You have to be, like, very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate doesn’t create something that, like, you know, just goes everywhere…which I suspect is the way the virus started in Wuhan to be honest, like, it makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere.

Why create mutations? Follow the money,

Because, like, sometimes there were just mutations that pop up and we’re not prepared for it, like with delta or omicron and things like that. So, who knows? I mean, either way, it’s going to be a cash cow. COVID will probably be a cash cow for us for awhile going forward, which I obviously like…

How convenient. He is alleging that a pharmaceutical behemoth is creating viruses that injure and destroy people, close businesses, and disrupt life all over the world just so they can monetize the supposed prevention for these viruses, the vaccines.

COVID mutates rapidly and by the time a vaccine is developed for a particular strain, that strain is extinct, making the vaccine irrelevant. What if Pfizer could create a mutant strain and a vaccine for it at the same time, rolling both out together? Is that what Dr Walker is implying? Repeating this every year? Cash cow indeed.

Pfizer, after two days, issued a statement, not surprisingly denying gain of function or directed evolution activities but not commenting on or denying Dr. Walker’s other assertions. Perhaps Pfizer has different official name for gain of function research. They also do not deny that Dr. Walker is their employee, nor do they threaten Project Veritas with a lawsuit for false reporting.

Read the Whole Article