I warn, do not be that stupid, understand you have damaged the immune systems of m (b)illions with COVID vaccines.
Experts are saying the smallpox vax 85% effective in monkey pox; this is NOT good news, for millions/billions are now immunocompromised from COVID vax; smallpox vax, potential re-introduction smallpox
Do we do anything extra as to this monkey pox? No. Do we be scared? No. Do we wear masks? No. Do we shut down anything, schools, business, society? No. Do we do some contact tracing? If we think it warrants. Do we mass quarantine? No. Do we order shelter-in-place? No. We just live life as normal and turn off the insane corrupted media. That is all. It is spread among men who have sex with men (MSM) mainly as per reporting. The rise in European and North American cases may likely be due to travel that is exporting out of traditional foci. Focus there where is seems to be the foci, and with some outreach, some PSA, some acute surveillance to characterize.
I will start with this statement before delving deeper: if it is as reported, showing up in mainly males, young males and MSM (some reports due to gay parties), then it will be prudent to acute focus there and begin a second and third generation type of surveillance system, if there is that much of a concern and if cases rise. Again, if the reports of mainly in MSM. Now as with HIV when it initially emerged, what helped more acutely characterize the virus and thus efforts to tamp down the transmission and to see where it was, we implemented what was known as second and third generation surveillance systems in low-risk mothers (prenatal and antenatal clinics) and in heterosexual relationships. The expectant woman etc. stands always as the lowest risk group for sexually transmitted diseases given her likely monogamy.
The issue we realized was that MSM and bisexuals were causing the HIV to be transmitted broadly (and into the heterosexual communities) when they engaged in contact with non-homosexual partners. MSM can have (and have been known to have) partners outside of the homosexual community. At the height of the HIV epidemic, heterosexual husbands who visited sex workers etc. took it home to low-risk women who thought they were in monogamous relationships. Heterosexual husbands who visited sex workers who were injecting drug users were also at heightened risk of exposure. So looking at the bisexual community for monkey pox and also women seeking pre-natal and antenatal pregnancy services could be of value as it was for HIV in understanding the virus. It will help us understand the extent of spread. Again, I do not think needed and I am only giving this explanation as a tip to the idiotic public health persons in USA and Canada and elsewhere who showed in COVID they are epidemiological morons!
This type of acute heightened surveillance is not needed but if there is more spread outside of Africa, we may want to focus on these low-risk groups to better understand the extent of spread beyond the MSM group if this is the principle at-risk/high-risk group. If what the media is reporting as to the predominance of monkey pox cases. We may also wish to focus on injecting drug users who tend to engage in other high-risk behaviors.
I guess that will not happen for the media will not talk about this. This aspect will be covered up and sidelined if this monkey pox became a larger spread issue. This is the putrid politics and games we face. I talk it as it is, so you will always get the truth from me.
