Cancer and the FDA

The gay lobby was able to overcome the Food and Drug Administration on anti-AIDS “cocktails.” This was one of the few major triumphs of politics over bureaucracy in my lifetime.

Consider this report.

Hasini Jayatilaka was a sophomore at the Johns Hopkins University working in a lab studying cancer cells when she noticed that when the cells become too densely packed, some would break off and start spreading.She wasn’t sure what to make of it, until she attended an academic conference and heard a speaker talking about bacterial cells behaving the same way. Yet when she went through the academic literature to see if anyone had written about similar behavior in cancer cells, she found nothing.

Seven years later, the theory Jayatilaka developed early in college is now a bona fide discovery that offers significant promise for cancer treatment.

Buy Gold at Discounted Prices

Jayatilaka and a team at Johns Hopkins discovered the biochemical mechanism that tells cancer cells to break off from the primary tumor and spread throughout the body, a process called metastasis. Some 90 percent of cancer deaths are caused when cancer metastasizes. The team also found that two existing, FDA-approved drugs can slow metastasis significantly.

The article goes into detail about two already existing therapies that are used for treating other diseases and cancer. They can be combined to slow metastasis in cancer cells. There is hope that with another discovery, metastasis may be stopped completely. But, even today, at least in experiments on animals, the rate of metastasis can be significantly slowed. People may be able to get extra years by using these treatments.

But, of course, the FDA is not going to allow this. The FDA is cancer. It has spread throughout the medical field. It metastasized a long time ago.

Free-market economists for half a century have complained about the FDA. The FDA demands that a new drug go through extensive testing. Almost nobody can afford to conduct these tests. This is one of the great subsidies to big Pharma. Economists have known this for decades, but the general public is oblivious.

The FDA insists that any new drug must be safe and effective. This means the FDA can establish the criteria for both safety and effectiveness. Why should the FDA have any authority to say whether a drug is effective or not? Isn’t that for sick people to decide? As for safety, courts have long-established liability. This can also be established by insurance companies. The FDA has no legitimate function in this area. Government should have no regulatory function in this area. But the public does not understand this. This goes back to Teddy Roosevelt. It was when the FDA was created.

The FDA wants to have rules that protect the FDA from criticism. The FDA wants to stop all possible criticism. There is no criticism from the dead people who did not get treatment from a drug that was never marketed. This is the fallacy described in 1850 by French pamphleteer and economist Frederic Bastiat. It is the fallacy of the thing not seen. In this case, it is the fallacy of the people not heard. Dead men tell no tales. Dead men do not write to their congressmen.

The gay community understood the threat to their members’ lives posed by the FDA. So, beginning in 1988, they staged one of the great public relations campaigns in the history of American politics. They browbeat the FDA, and the FDA capitulated. You can read about it here. That successful public relations campaign saved a lot of lives. But the public forgets that it took political mobilization and political theater to break the resistance of the FDA, which sped up the bureaucratic process of authorizing new drugs to treat AIDS.

Read the Whole Article