Editor’s Note: Late last year, The Chicago Tribune performed an independent safety analysis of the city’s extensive red-light camera network. The study concluded that “the cameras do not reduce injury-related crashes overall—undercutting Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s primary defense of a program beset by mismanagement, malfunction and a $2 million bribery scandal.” The study also found that the city’s claims of a 47 percent decrease in side-impact collisions was grossly overstated and that rear-end collisions actually increased. This news prompted NMA ally Jay Beeber, executive director of Safer Streets L.A., to provide the following analysis on why red-light cameras have no positive impact on intersection safety.
The biggest problem with the theory that red-light cameras prevent side-impact collisions is one that is rarely ever addressed—what’s the mechanism by which this allegedly occurs?
Battlefield America: T... Best Price: $10.95 Buy New $18.80 (as of 10:15 EST - Details) Let’s look at the pro-RLC argument. Camera supporters claim that by putting up ticketing cameras, drivers will “adjust their behavior” or “drive more carefully” around the cameras, making the intersections safer. They never go beyond that explanation.
So let’s try to answer the question of how red-light cameras perform their magic. What behavior is being changed or in what way are motorists driving more carefully?
Red-light cameras only target one type of behavior—when a driver could have stopped with a safe and comfortable deceleration rate but instead chooses to “gun it” to try to make it through so they don’t have to stop for the light. I think it’s silly to pretend that this doesn’t happen. It unquestionably does. But not to the extent that many think and usually only when a driver is within the indecision zone. It’s very unlikely that a driver further than about 5-6 seconds travel time to the intersection will try to make it. So the driver who exhibits the behavior targeted by the red-light cameras will, if they fail, run the light by a fraction of a second. How to Beat The Police... Best Price: null Buy New $0.99 (as of 08:35 EST - Details)
What’s the effect of this? First, let’s consider a driver who does not run the light but crosses the limit line a fraction of a second before the light turns red. In states with a permissive yellow law (meaning that if your vehicle breaks the plane of the intersection before the light turns red, you have not committed a violation, even if the light turns red while you’re still in the intersection) this is perfectly legal. If there’s no all-red clearance interval, cross traffic could start up before this driver makes it across the intersection. Even then, due to start-up delay, there’s unlikely to be a collision, but it could happen, especially if a driver approaching from the cross street sees the light changing ahead and enters the intersection at speed.
Now consider the red-light runner who crosses the limit line a fraction of a second after the light turns red because he decided to go when he could have stopped. What is the practical difference between this driver and the one above? Nothing. That fraction of a second probably has no more likelihood of causing a collision. There is very little, if any, difference in crash exposure due to these two types of drivers.
Police State - Ten Sec... Best Price: null Buy New $7.99 (as of 09:25 EST - Details)
Arrest-Proof Yourself Best Price: $8.49 Buy New $10.53 (as of 05:55 EST - Details)
Amazon Prime (One Year... Check Amazon for Pricing.