Thoreau's Walden: Phony Testament of the Greens

Henry David Thoreau was one of the most successful literary scam artists in American history. Walden was a masterpiece of fraud.

This book has been inflicted on helpless English majors ever since the 1930’s. It is anti-capitalist and pro-green. It has been the supreme literary testament of the greens.

It was fake from day one.

Henry David Thoreau was a practicing capitalist. His family owned a pencil-making business. He worked for it for most of his adult life. He was an American version of Frederick Engels, who converted Karl Marx to socialism in 1843. He bankrolled Marx for the rest of Marx’s life. Engels had the money to do this. He ran the family’s textile mill until he retired a wealthy man.[amazon asin=1619493918&template=*lrc ad (right)]

A year after Engels turned Marx into a Marxist, Thoreau went to live on Walden Pond. He did not own the pond or the land. Walden never says who owned it. Ralph Waldo Emerson owned it. Thoreau briefly had taught Emerson’s children and also the children of Emerson’s brother.

Thoreau built a shack on the land. He lived in it for 26 months. Then he left the land forever. He went home to mama’s, and spent eight years writing Walden. It is an anti-capitalist, anti-commerce, pro-green tract. He hated economic growth. But he profited from it as a capitalist.

While living in “the wild,” he had his mother do his laundry for him. He never married. He lived with her instead.

In other words, the book was a sham from day one. The mythology of Walden Pond is a sham. The mythologists know this, but they refuse to let loose of the myth.

The book had no influence in his lifetime. He died in 1862. It became widely read by intellectuals in the 1930’s, during the Great Depression. It was part of the anti-capitalism worldview of Leftist intellectuals. They recognized a kindred spirit.

The book is a literary disaster. I have spent my adult life writing for a living. I can recognize good writing. He shows occasional flashes of brilliance, but most of the book is either irrelevant or insufferably boring. It is worse than National Public Radio’s All Things Considered.

The most gripping section of the book describes a battle between red ants and black ants. There are few passages in literature that better illustrate the Darwinian phrase, “nature, red in tooth and claw.” I am therefore not saying that Thoreau could not write well. I am saying that he rarely wrote well in Walden. Its reputation as a literary masterpiece is part of the anti-capitalist, pro-green mythology.

The praise that literary critics heap on the book is a public testimony to the academic con job known as literary criticism. Let me offer an example of this mostly tax-funded cottage industry. This is from the latest version of Wikipedia: article on “Walden.” I wrote this for 9th grade English students. I teach a course on autobiographies for the Ron Paul Curriculum. I prepare students to write their own autobiographies. Walden is by far the best-known and most influential autobiography in the course. It is also by far the worst written.

My comments are in brackets.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Walden (first published as Walden; or, Life in the Woods) is an American book written by noted transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, a reflection upon simple living in natural surroundings. The work is part personal declaration of independence, social experiment, voyage of spiritual discovery, satire, and manual for self-reliance.

[The book has nothing to do with self-reliance. He lived two miles from his mother’s house. He regularly bought supplies in Concord. He spent many of his summer evenings in Concord. With regard to his supposed understanding of his self, he brought this with him.]

First published in 1854, it details Thoreau’s experiences over the course of two years, two months, and two days in a cabin he built near Walden Pond, amidst woodland owned by his friend and mentor Ralph Waldo Emerson, near Concord, Massachusetts. The book compresses the time into a single calendar year and uses passages of four seasons to symbolize human development.

[The book never mentions Emerson. It never says who owned the land. The book barely mentions human development. If that is what the book really is about, the author was too subtle for me.]

By immersing himself in nature, Thoreau hoped to gain a more objective understanding of society through personal introspection. Simple living and self-sufficiency were Thoreau’s other goals, and the whole project was inspired by transcendentalist philosophy, a central theme of the American Romantic Period. As Thoreau made clear in his book, his cabin was not in wilderness but at the edge of town, about two miles (3 km) from his family home.

[Always compare high-flying literary analysis like this with the actual book. Never assume that the person who writes something like this knows what he is talking about. Read critically. Don’t take anyone’s word for this. Decide for yourself.]

Read the rest of the article