Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, Hastings Was Murdered

In March 2013, Attorney General, Eric Holder, answered a February 2013 inquiry from Senator Rand Paul as to whether Obama had any intentions of assassinating American citizens on American soil through the use of drones.Holder also stated that Obama “has no intention” of targeting American citizens with unmanned aerial vehicles, but would do so if facing “an extraordinary circumstance.”

I presume from the Attorney General’s characterization of Obama’s need to assassinate America citizens,  but only under “an extraordinary circumstance” applies to journalists attempting to the tell the truth about the morally bankrupt Obama administration and their criminal enterprise operations which constitute a clear and present danger to the United States.

This is the first of a two part story which examines the three following questions:

1. Was Michael Hastings murdered?

2. If so, why was he murdered?

3. How was the murder accomplished

Part one of this series examines the evidence supporting a charge of murder in the death of investigative reporter Michael Hastings. Also, some the ground work is laid with regard to the second question on why Michael Hastings was murdered. Part two will fully develop the motives as to why Hastings was murdered as well as how the murder was accomplished. The cover story related to Hastings’ death will be examined as well as evidence which destroys the credibility of the “official account.” Also Part two will reveal how the lives of the investigators looking into this event are also in jeopardy.

Obama and Holder Are Cut From the Same Cloth As the Zeta’s

The Zeta’s Mexican drug cartel gang is known for abducting their opposition, torturing and murdering them and then dissolving their bodies in acid in order to destroy the evidence of the crime. As the news of these heinous crimes reached the US air waves, the media impact of these stories created a collective sense of horror among the public. However, most of the mainstream media’s reaction to these abhorrent acts seems to be selective at best. It seems acceptable to reveal these types of crimes when it involves Mexican national gangsters, but if the same acts are approved of by the highest ranking officials in our country, the coverage of the topic is out of bounds. However, an emerging story related to the murder of journalist Michael Hastings is casting Obama and Holder in the same light as the well-publicized Zeta Mexican drug cartel and their barbaric and murderous ways.

Today, the NSA/CIA and even the President can “legally” kill a whistleblower, force local officials to conduct a shoddy autopsy and then cremate the body of the victim against the wishes of the next of kin, and then send the ashes to the grieving relatives in an urn just as the coroner did with the body of Michael Hastings. Subsequently, the evidence is destroyed and Obama and Holder maintain plausible deniability. The murder of Michael Hastings is proof positive that we are indeed being ruled by the most virulent criminals on the planet and the evidence that follows supports this allegation.

The Official Version of Hastings Death

Michael Hastings Body Was Cremated Against Family Wishes

The official version of the Hastings death stated that he was traveling at an excessive speed, at least 80 mph, when he lost control of his car and he crashed into a tree causing his Mercedes to burst into a flames, which resulted in his death. According to the coroner, the Hastings body was burned beyond recognition. That claim is disputed by an eyewitness to the crime as reported on Infowars Nightly News who stated that the body was recognizable and intact..

The fact that Hastings’ family had requested that the body be sent to them for proper burial and this request was not honored, should be investigated. Unless there was a compelling legal reason to not comply with the family request to have the body sent to them, the coroner committed a criminal act for which he should be prosecuted.

Read the rest of the article