Recently by Simon Black: US Justice Department Logic: Bernanke Is a Domestic Terrorist
Have you ever seen the devastation from a BGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missile? Its beyond description. Standing in the impact area, its as if nothing has ever existed there before.
Its naive to think that something with so much destructive power is unlikely to cause collateral damage. I can only imagine the consequences of 159 and counting, the amount of force that has been unleashed in Libya as yet by western governments.
This morning, US Defense Secretary Robert Gates shrugged off any implication that military strikes are responsible for significant civilian casualties in Libya while at the same time playing down Americas role and the timeline for continued action.
This is insane. You are either at war, or you are not. Warfare requires clearly defined objectives, competent generals, and well-resourced fighting forces it cannot be waged with half-measures and stammering equivocation.
Yet, here we are again, watching bureaucrats tap dance in front of voters, playing down the long-term ramifications of engagement and outright rejecting the idea of regime change as an intended objective.
They feel 100% justified in their decision to wage a half war without getting their hands dirty, rejecting any consequences to civilians, all under the auspices of protecting civilians but only Libyan civilians.
Much praise has been heaped on Barack Obama, Nicolas Sarkozy, and the UN Security Council for their political courage, taking action in the face of popular backlash to defend Libyans.
Political courage is an oxymoron. Everything these people do is for their professional gain, to be reelected, and the fallout of these decisions costs lives and economic misfortune. The cost of the munitions alone so far is over a quarter billion dollars, let alone the human cost.
Barack Obama himself said in 2002, What I am opposed to is the attempt by political hacks to distract us from a rise in the uninsured, a rise in the poverty rate, a drop in the median income to distract us from corporate scandals and a stock market that has just gone through the worst month since the Great Depression. Thats what Im opposed to. A dumb war. A rash war. A war based not on reason but on passion, not on principle but on politics.
Sounds great. Spoken like a true Nobel Laureate.