In my article "Saying Yes to the Party of No," I commented on how pleased Ive been to see Glenn Beck talking about a subject Ive been writing about since the late seventies: a government-declared state of emergency leading to a "temporary" dictatorship.
I have long believed that the mathematics of an insatiable entitlement society in the U.S. guarantees a runaway inflation, which likely would be followed by anarchy and chaos a perfect excuse for government to resort to strong-armed totalitarian measures to "restore order." My model has always been Germanys Weimar Republic in the 1920s, where runaway inflation brought Adolf Hitler to power.
Obamanomics: How Barac... Best Price: $3.00 Buy New $6.50 (as of 04:50 UTC - Details)
I originally believed that the runaway-inflation scenario in the U.S. would play out in the early 1980s, but a combination of Ronald Reagan and an explosion in computers and electronic technology made possible by the remnants of our capitalist system headed it off.
Nevertheless, the threat of a runaway inflation has continued to increase over the years, even while our false-prosperity economy was booming. Thats because the underlying causes (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, insane union and government-employee wages and benefits, Social Security, Medicare, etc.) of our sick economy have never been addressed.
Unemployment is just a symptom; the disease is entitlements. Throughout the false-prosperity years, Social Security did not go away. It got bigger. Medicare did not go away. It got bigger. Virtually no other benefits went away. They only got bigger. So the underlying problem of entitlements not only has remained, but continued to grow.
Direct Citizen Action:... Best Price: $0.47 Buy New $5.75 (as of 09:05 UTC - Details)
The big news now is that Social Security may "go broke" this year instead of in 2017, which was originally projected. Really? And here I thought its been broke for decades. Ditto with Medicare. These programs were long ago Madoffized. Almost from the start, government has simply taken in new money from "investors" (read, taxpayers) and handed it over to those on the entitlements side of the fence with a large chunk of the largesse being skimmed off the top for government employees who administer these programs (and vote for those whom they believe are most likely to safeguard their jobs).
All it took to bring things to a head was a shameful spending spree by a progressive Republican president and a Republican Congress, followed by the ascent of a committed Marxist to the presidency (along with a cooperative majority in Congress).
Now, throw on top of all that a huge new tax-and-spending bill (euphemistically referred to as "health-care legislation"), and the end result seems assured. However, with the governments power to tax, print, and borrow, no one knows how long it will be before the inevitable runaway inflation sets in.
Patriots: A Novel of S... Best Price: $1.10 Buy New $1.99 (as of 03:05 UTC - Details)
But if BHO truly has his mind set on establishing a dictatorship and it is my personal belief that he does its too risky for him to wait for a runaway inflation as an excuse to call a state of emergency. He knows that as long as there is a semblance of a free market in place, producers will continue to push back against the economy-killing effects of his policies.
Thus, he needs another excuse to declare a state of emergency, and over the past year I've given a lot of thought to what that excuse might be. In previous articles, I've mentioned a nuke exchange between Iran and Israel as one possibility. Another is civil unrest due to unemployment rates that could reach 25 percent or more in the not-too-distant future.
These and others still remain possibilities, but last week Glenn Beck came up with one that may be even more likely. Beck believes that Obama will continue to keep the accelerator pressed to the floor amnesty for illegal immigrants, a cap-and-trade bill that will eliminate the U.S. as a global business competitor, and more thus enraging an already angry public to the point of revolution.
In other words, purposely foment civil unrest rather than wait for something like unemployment or runaway inflation to make it happen. As Beck puts it, just continue to poke people in the eye, then use their predictable and justifiable backlash as an excuse to establish dictatorial powers.
To Be or Not to Be Int... Best Price: $1.25 Buy New $1.99 (as of 03:55 UTC - Details)
I thought about this issue while attending the recent tea party outside the Capitol Building in Washington. As I crossed Independence Avenue, I noted a somber-looking guard holding a Rambo-style weapon in his hands. I have no idea what it was, but theres no question in my mind that just one pull of the trigger could have rearranged the body parts of a large number of tea-party people.
The totally peaceful gathering repeat, totally peaceful was infested with heavily armed police, but one, in particular, was especially ominous. As the tea partiers chanted Kill the Bill on the east side of the Capitol Building, a uniformed, lone figure stood at the top of the steep flight of stairs on the House side of the structure, automatic weapon at the ready, gazing down over the crowd. Sun glasses and all, he reminded me of the boss man of Cool Hand Lukes chain gang.
It gave me the eerie feeling that I was in a banana republic. Had anyone dared to take things beyond mere chanting, theres no doubt in my mind that it would have become a scene right out of Caracas. All that was missing was Sean Penn.
Yep, I believe Glenn Beck might be on to something. But if the American public refuses to take the bait and doesnt resort to violence, BHO will have to go to Plan B to have an excuse to declare a state of emergency.
Having said all this, dont despair. No one, including myself, can predict the future with certainty. In a rapidly changing world, nothing is certain. Which is why I dont make predictions; I just lay odds. And heres my odds based on what I know and see today:
- The chances of a declared state of emergency and ensuing dictatorship prior to the 2010 elections: 25%
- The chances of a declared state of emergency and ensuing dictatorship prior to the 2012 elections: 50%
- The chances of the U.S. dollar becoming worthless within three years: 25%
- The chances of the U.S. dollar becoming worthless within ten years: 90%
- The chances of the Republicans cutting back on major entitlements if they regain power in the 2010 elections: Zero
- The chances of the Republicans cutting back on major entitlements if they win the presidency and an overwhelming majority in Congress in 2012: 5%
- The chances of the so-called tea-party people (i.e., everyday Americans who believe in liberty) winning out over the long haul: Hmm let me procrastinate on that one a bit before I lay odds.
Of course, I could be wrong about all this but what if Im right?
Reprinted from Robert Ringer’s website.
April 5, 2010