• Putting the Bite Back in Tax Enforcement

    Email Print
    Share


    DIGG THIS

    Lew Rockwell
    has written about u201CRed
    State Fascism
    ,u201D the shift of conservative state bourgeoisie
    from mind-your-own-business libertarianism to u201Calmost totalitarian
    statist nationalism.u201D The Detroit Free Press (u201CMichigan
    Falls Off In Pursuit Of Tax Cheats
    u201D) of July 10, 2006 would
    have us believe an offsetting libertarian trend has occurred in
    blue state Michigan over the same period of time, as the newspaper
    cites an alarming decrease in the number of criminal tax investigations
    by the Michigan State Police. How alarming? Read them and weep (or
    laugh, you tax-hating libertarians!):

    By
    the numbers

    The number
    of criminal tax investigations by the Michigan State Police
    major-case team is dwindling.

    Year

    No.

    1999

    29

    2000

    31

    2001

    29

    2002

    24

    2003

    12

    2004

    14

    2005

     9

    ’06
    (through May 31)

     2

    There you have
    it. In a state of over six million individual and business taxpayers,
    the number of cases has dropped from 29 in 1999 to only 9 in 2005;
    if current trends continue, only five investigations will take place
    in 2006.

    In the article,
    tax expert and attorney Michael Indenbaum argues that lack of u201Ccriminal
    enforcement undermines the entire tax system.u201D He means that government
    agents, entrusted with collecting “contributions” at the point of
    a gun, have failed to wield that gun in a sufficiently menacing
    manner. This limp-wristed approach, not surprisingly, has failed
    to meet with the full cooperation of taxpayers reluctant to part
    with their hard-earned cash. How will society build the jails to
    house pot smokers, prostitutes and 19 year-old beer drinkers? Who
    will finance baseball stadiums for billionaire welfare queens? Civilization
    itself hangs in the balance.

    The tax attorney
    further argues that when tax enforcement grows lax, the rest of
    us have to pony up more dollars to make up the shortfall. In so
    doing, he perpetuates a myth that belies his status as tax expert.
    As the great Ludwig von Mises once observed, “In public administration,
    there is no connection between revenue and expenditure.” Does anyone
    with a grasp of reality really believe otherwise?

    No doubt Mr.
    Indenbaum would hasten to remind the tax haters that u201Cfreedom isn't
    free.u201D And he'd be quite right. Freedom, in fact, is the opposite
    of freedom. Freedom is theft, fraud, extortion, violence, threats
    of violence, conscription, surveillance, kidnapping, extraordinary
    rendition, torture and incarceration. All that matters is that those
    otherwise distasteful activities be carried out by the proper democratically
    elected officials advancing the public good, as defined by those
    same democratically elected officials.

    In concluding,
    the Free Press notes that our state-sanctioned protection
    racket is a system “based on voluntary compliance” and “the
    hammer of criminal prosecution.” You might say it’s “free and compulsory.”
    You might also say George Orwell’s immortal words never rang so
    true: “To see what is in front of one’s nose requires a constant
    struggle.”

    September
    22, 2006

    Tony
    Pivetta [send him mail] lives
    in Royal Oak, Michigan, where he pines for a bygone era in which
    baseball actively strove to maintain its continuity with its past.
    He draws dark parallels between the rise of publicly financed stadiums
    and the demise of both the Grand Old Game and the cause of American
    liberty.

    Email Print
    Share