• Rush, Sean, and Dr. Savage

    Email Print

    I noted in my
    open letter to Rush Limbaugh
    , which incidentally, got quite
    a positive response, I no longer regularly listen to the gentleman's
    radio show. But I do tune in occasionally to see what the foremost
    defender of our precious constitutionally-guaranteed rights is up
    to. Recently he was carrying on, as he often does, about the political
    opposition to the Bush administration's enlightened nation-building
    efforts in Iraq. This unenlightened opposition to George the 2nd's
    humanitarian efforts wouldn't have gotten away with such unpatriotic
    shenanigans in Lincoln's day, the nation's number one historian
    and supporter of the Constitution informed his listeners as he related
    how Honest Abe had treated those who gave him guff during the so-called
    Civil War.

    Ohio congressman Clement L. Vallandigham had the audacity to make
    a speech in which he accused Lincoln of unconstitutionally usurping
    power, Abe had the congressman arrested by federal troops and then
    deported to the South. Lincoln also shut down newspapers that opposed
    the war, arrested editors who took that position, and suspended
    habeas corpus, the very acts the congressman was criticizing. Wow!
    That's not the Sandburgian Honest Abe that we all learned about
    from the government educational establishment. In Illinois, where
    I'm from and went to school, Lincoln was godlike and never would
    have done such things. But he did do such things, as Thomas DiLorenzo
    and others have verified. Lincoln was a dictator, and we're not
    supposed to approve of dictators in this country. However, instead
    of undermining Lincoln's image, knowledge of these actions of his
    during the War Between the States enhances Abe's image in Rush's
    mind. Rush approvingly, even merrily, related these facts as an
    object lesson. And our wimpy liberals (remember, only liberals oppose
    the war) think that the Bush Bunch is roughing up too many folks
    in Iraq and here at home who oppose the neocon agenda. Honest Abe
    showed us how to handle opposition to presidential will during time
    of war, and wasn't he just about the greatest president we ever
    had? The Constitution is all well and good, but you can't let it
    get in the way in time of war. Presidents, or at least the great
    ones like Lincoln and Bush II (stifle that guffaw!), have to be
    trusted to do the right thing, even if they have to ignore the Constitution
    and act dictatorish now and again. This apparently is the position
    taken by Rush, the great constitutionalist.

    also monitor Rush, Jr., Sean Hannity, but not as much as I used
    to. Sean is a Great American. Just ask his adoring fans. They're
    all great Americans too. When black congresswoman Cynthia McKinney
    smacked a white Capitol Hill policeman who tried to keep her from
    entering her Capitol Hill turf because she wasn't wearing her ID
    and he didn't recognize her, Hannity went ballistic. Who was she
    to resist a cop who was just trying to do his job and keep her turf
    safe? No one has the right to resist a cop doing his/her job, according
    to Great American Sean, who often claims that he has libertarian
    leanings. When anyone involved in policing or security work requests
    that you do this or that, the proper thing to do is say "yes
    sir/ma'am!" and comply with that request.

    I'm a law-abiding sort. In my 72 years I've had one ticket for parking
    in a no-parking zone from which the no-parking sign had been removed,
    one speeding ticket, and two speeding warnings. I've known a few
    cops. One of my former students was our local Evansville, Indiana
    police chief a few years back; another whom I run across occasionally
    is an Indiana state trooper. I've known other Indiana troopers,
    city cops, and deputy sheriffs, and the late husband of a family
    friend over in my native Illinois was an Illinois state trooper,
    as was one of the members of a gun club I once belonged to over
    there. The cops I've known reasonably well have all been decent
    conscientious guys; I don't envy their work, and I don't want to
    cause cops any unnecessary trouble. But unlike Great American Sean,
    I can think of times when questioning the authority of the police
    is called for.

    sociologist and former social justice organizer John R. Salter,
    Jr. noted in his contribution to my edited book, The
    Gun Culture and Its Enemies
    (1990), during the civil rights
    push of the 1960s, police stations in some southern communities
    publicized Ku Klux Klan meetings and recruited for that organization.
    And he also noted that the police of some south and southwestern
    Chicago districts were no better when he was organizing there in
    the 1970s. I can hear the Great American's response: "That
    was a long time ago, and we've come a long way since then."
    Yup! All the way to Waco and the incineration by federal police
    of some 80 men, women, and children, many black, who happened to
    have non-traditional religious beliefs and were rumored to be violating
    federal firearms law, a victimless and constitutionally-questionable
    crime. "But that was during the lawless Clinton years,"
    Sean would say. Then how about the sterling performance by federal
    police at Ruby Ridge during the reign of George the 1st?
    Should Randy Weaver have been polite to them after they killed his
    son and wife? But these are only some of the most publicized examples
    of wrongdoing on the part of the police, none of whom were punished
    for their wrongdoing in the cases mentioned. I certainly don't mean
    to tar all police, but though it may come as a shock to the Great
    American, wrongdoing by police is hardly rare.

    sometimes even listen to Michael Savage, another super patriot and
    the world's foremost independent thinker. Just ask him. Or wait
    a few seconds and he'll tell you even if you don't ask him. Why
    here's a man so independent that he can even criticize Bush for
    being too wimpy with the insurgents in Iraq and with war opponents
    here at home. And he's so independent and courageous that he even
    refers to fellow talker Saint Rush, a man who actually possesses
    "talent on loan from Gawd," as Hush Bimbaugh. Can you
    imagine that? Now that takes real courage, but what would you expect
    from a man named Savage? What a courage surge he must have experienced
    when he changed his name from Weiner. And how clever he is! Hush
    Bimbaugh, of all names. Who would have ever thought of that without
    the assistance of a battery of third graders? But Michael has a
    way with words. In fact, I wonder sometimes if he doesn't have the
    knack of speaking in tongues, because he can babble on incoherently
    while conjuring up such profundities as "a citizen's first
    obligation is to the state," or something like that. Now that
    sounds sort of fascist to me, but he has a Ph.D. that his listeners
    have found out about even though he's too modest to mention it more
    than a hundred times per show, so he must know. Wait a minute! I've
    got a Ph.D., and I didn't know that. Well, maybe that's because
    mine isn't from the prestigious (he reminds his listeners) University
    of California at Berkeley in epidemiology and nutrition science.
    Or was it nutritional ethnomedicine or something like that that
    makes him an expert on everything? And then there's his ongoing
    trademark exclamation, "I can't take it anymore"! His
    listeners know that he actually can, because he's the world's foremost
    independent thinker and he's got a Ph.D. from Berkeley in whatever,
    and his most worshipful listeners call him Dr. Savage. Well anyway,
    Savage (I can visualize him swinging through the trees on a vine
    yodeling like Tarzan, but with a Brooklyn accent) wants to get even
    rougher on those ragheads resisting the neocon's humane efforts
    to liberate them and those liberal (always liberal) American critics
    of the war than Honest Abe was on his opponents, North and South.
    Nuke the cities of the former after dropping leaflets warning noncombatants
    to leave, and shoot the liberal critics for treason. Somehow I don't
    feel all better because this guy claims to be a strong independent-thinking
    defender of our freedoms, but there are oodles of Dr. Savage worshippers
    out there who believe that he is such. This, even though he sounds
    like New York Democrat senator Chucky Schumer, another questionable
    self-professed protector of our freedoms, but from the wascally
    liberal side of the fence. When Savage starts screaming, I think
    of all the Ritalin being wasted on unruly school boys.

    email responder to my open letter to Rush chided me for taking him
    seriously — Rush is simply entertaining us. I'm sure that lots of
    folks do listen not only to Rush but to Sean, Dr. Savage, and their
    numerous clownish colleagues for entertainment. I admit that I get
    a sort of scab-picking pleasure out of listening to Savage. But
    millions of our fellow Americans uncritically look to these authoritarians
    for enlightenment. That's scary!!!! Of course, it's also scary that
    millions of our fellow Americans still uncritically look to the
    mainstream media for enlightenment. Those of us who have closely
    and knowledgeably followed mainstream media coverage of such controversial
    issues as gun control know all too well that the talk-radio guys
    are right on when they carry on about the liberal bias of the mainstream
    media that can reach Orwellian extremes. It pays to examine critically
    everything fed to us by the liberal mainstreamers as well as by
    the right-wing-authoritarian radio talkers.

    6, 2006

    R. Tonso [send him mail]
    a retired sociology professor (University of Evansville) who has
    written a lot on the gun issue, both sociological and pro-Second
    Amendment. His recent book, Gun
    Control=People Control
    , is a collection of eleven of his
    essays previously published in Liberty, Reason, Chronicles,
    and Gun Week.

    Email Print