article-single

Another 'Coalition of the Willing'?

At last week’s Conference on Disarmament, Stephen Rademaker, acting assistant secretary, International Security and Nonproliferation, submitted a draft Fissile Material Cut-Off Treaty that would be acceptable to the Bush-Cheney administration.

In September 1993, President Bill Clinton had called for a “multilateral” convention banning the production of “fissile materials” for use in nuclear weapons, and in March 1995 the Conference on Disarmament established a committee to begin drafting such a treaty.

Then, the 2000 Review Conference of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons approved an “action agenda” for “systematic and progressive efforts” to implement disarmament requirements of Article VI of the NPT.

Although supported by Clinton, two action steps on that agenda – early entry into force of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and negotiation of a multilateral, international and “effectively verifiable” fissile material cutoff treaty (FMCT) – have not been supported by his successor.

In fact, Secretary of State Condi Rice declined to even address the 2005 NPT Review Conference and prevented the final report of the 2000 NPT Review Conference from even being mentioned – especially the “13 steps” to nuke disarmament – much less endorsed.

Nevertheless, it was something of a surprise that Rademaker used his introduction of the U.S.-supported FMCT draft to make the following remarks to the Conference on Disarmament:

On Sept. 24 of last year, the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency adopted a resolution formally determining that Iran was in noncompliance with its safeguards obligations due to its “many failures and breaches.”

As a result of this finding by the IAEA Board, as well as a separate finding by the Board in that same resolution that Iran’s nuclear program raises questions that are within the competence of the U.N. Security Council as the organ bearing main responsibility for international peace and security, Iran was formally reported to the Security Council in February of this year.

On March 29, the Security Council, acting by consensus, adopted a Presidential Statement calling on Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment-related activities, cooperate fully with the IAEA’s ongoing investigations, and enter into good faith negotiations on measures to restore international confidence in Iran’s nuclear intentions.

The United States expects the Security Council to fulfill its responsibility under the U.N. Charter to address the threat to international peace and security posed by Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program, and it will be a defeat for effective multilateralism should the Council fail to live up to this responsibility.

Now, Rademaker’s remarks are outrageously misleading. Moreover, what has the Iran-IAEA issue got to do with the FMCT?

In particular, since Bush launched his war of aggression against Iraq – allegedly to destroy a nuclear program IAEA inspectors had been unable to detect – Iran has been a principal advocate of the NPT, CTBT and the FMCT.

Well – according to Bush – the problem is that the NPT “has a loophole which has been exploited by nations such as North Korea and Iran. These regimes are allowed to produce nuclear material that can be used to build bombs under the cover of civilian nuclear programs.”

Wrong!

Outrageously wrong!

In fact, all NPT-signatories not already having nukes – such as Iran – are required to enter into a Safeguards Agreement with the IAEA for the “exclusive purpose” of verifying to other NPT-signatories that no “source or special nuclear materials” are used in furtherance of any military purpose.

As best the IAEA could determine, up and until the time North Korea withdrew from the NPT, no NPT-proscribed materials had been so used.

And, as best the IAEA can determine, no Iranian NPT-proscribed material has ever been so used.

Contrary to Rademaker, according to IAEA Director-General Mohamed ElBaradei, Iran is in complete compliance with its safeguards agreement.

Furthermore, the FMCT – even as drafted by Bush – is intended to prevent countries that are outside the NPT – such as India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea – from producing any more fissile material for use in nuclear weapons.

No wonder Iran’s delegate to the Disarmament Conference – Hamid Eslamizad – noted that Rademaker’s call for “effective multilateralism” by signatories to the FMCT to deal with “the threat to international peace and security posed by Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program,” which the Security Council has so far declined to so characterize, is strikingly similar to Bush’s appeal back in 2003 for effective multilateralism “by a coalition of the willing” to deal with what Bush claimed was the threat to international peace and security posed by Iraq’s (non-existent) nuclear weapons program.

May 22, 2006