• No Freedom or Independence Without Peace

    Email Print
    Share

    Where exactly
    are Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? You know, the ones that
    justified a pre-emptive attack by United States forces on a country
    that hasn't attacked or threatened us.

    No one talks
    much about them any more. Granted, Marines might be uncovering MWDs
    as we speak, and it would surprise no one, myself included, if Iraq's
    totalitarian regime had a few of the types of weapons that the United
    States and its allies have at least one time or another stockpiled
    in military warehouses.

    If the Iraqi
    regime really was such a threat to the United States and the world
    because of its elusive chemical and biological weapons caches, why
    didn't the regime use those weapons when it had nothing to lose?

    No wonder that,
    without missing a beat, American war planners and their "Iraq
    and roll" cheerleaders on 24/7 news channels already are on
    to other justifications for the war, emphasizing that the real purpose
    for bombing, maiming and killing people in a country far from U.S.
    soil is to bring them democracy and freedom.

    You know, like
    the freedoms we have in California ? the freedom to hand over more
    than 50 percent of your income to the government to dispense with
    as it pleases, the freedom to build anything you want on our property
    provided you first get 17 government agencies to agree to the project,
    the freedom to run your business exactly the way the state labor
    department thinks you ought to run it.

    Perhaps that's
    too cynical. But, the safety of our own freedoms is worth mulling
    as Americans prepare to install free and democratic societies on
    other parts of the world. As the founders understood, the first
    way to promote freedom abroad is to secure it at home. Why not be
    a beacon of liberty, but the protector only of our own liberties?

    The problem
    is that America is doing a pitiful job protecting its freedoms here
    at home. Perhaps a little war will keep the conservatives from noticing.
    Every proposal in Congress and state Legislatures is pushing in
    the big-government direction, the president's shrinking proposal
    for a piddling amount of tax cuts notwithstanding. Here in California,
    we witness a never-ending attempt to increase taxes, restrict private
    gun ownership, expand the size of government bureaucracies and police
    forces, and restrict property rights and personal rights.

    Give it another
    decade at this rate, and … well, I shudder to think about it.
    Yet the same conservatives who rightly berated President Clinton's
    attempts to turn America into Amerika, have launched no criticisms
    as a Republican president tries the same thing. They are too busy
    whooping it up over a foreign war to notice.

    All their pretenses
    of limited government have gone down the toilet. Following last
    week, when faux-populist Bill O'Reilly gave me my 15 minutes of
    fame by attacking me on his radio and TV show for my criticism of
    the war, and the idea that we should all stop criticizing it when
    soldiers are in harm's way, I've been inundated with emails from
    supposed conservatives who make frighteningly totalitarian arguments.

    Americans must
    not only give up our right to speak out, but we must open our wallets
    and support any cost to free the Iraqi people. Notice how quickly
    blind supporters of the government follow the propaganda line? They
    were right there when the administration was bleating about weapons
    of mass destruction, and are right there when the policy has shifted
    to the supposed freeing of the Iraqi people.

    To oppose this
    assault on our tax dollars, or to oppose the Patriot Act and other
    terrorism-related assaults on our liberties, is downright unAmerican,
    I've been told. I'm a coward, some have said, with one writer expressing
    his willingness to "prove it."

    I heard some
    analyst on one of the nonstop radio or TV news shows admitting that
    the private sector might "even" have a role in the rebuilding
    of Iraq. Imagine that. This is what passes for conservatism today
    ? shutting up and doing what the government tells you, accepting
    the undermining of our freedoms with a happy face, denouncing free
    speech as traitorous, believing that the government, as opposed
    to the private sector, is the key to building a functioning society.

    Well, as my
    Register column next week explains, John Quincy Adams had a response
    for those who insist that America should go across the world looking
    for monsters to destroy.

    "She well
    knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own were
    they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve
    herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest
    and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume
    the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims
    of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force …."

    That's what
    has happened. War supporters are so enamored of using force abroad
    that they don't see a problem with using it at home. But, as Adams
    noted, "[America's] glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her
    march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield; but
    the motto upon her shield is Freedom, Independence, Peace."

    I'd like to
    remind the neoconservative war mongers that the first two words
    on that shield are dependent on the last one.

    April
    17, 2003

    Steven
    Greenhut (send him mail)
    is a senior editorial writer and columnist for the Orange County
    Register in Santa Ana, Calif.

    Steven
    Greenhut Archives


         

    Email Print
    Share