• Why I Am Voting for Harry Browne

    Email Print
    Share

    In
    the upcoming presidential election, I am voting for Harry Browne.
    When I tell this to friends (both of them) or acquaintances, they
    usually reply with one of the following familiar arguments:

    "You're
    throwing your vote away. A vote for Browne is a vote for Gore."

    This
    one's easy. My vote for Browne will only "elect Gore"
    if the election is decided by one vote. (Well, the electoral college
    complicates things, but you get the idea.) If I vote for a third
    party candidate, I (ever so slightly) increase the plausibility
    of such candidates in everyone's eyes, making it harder for people
    next cycle to say, "Yes, we agree that Browne (or Ventura or
    Buchanan) would be better, but he can't win."

    In
    contrast, if I vote for George W. Bush, then I really am
    "throwing away" my vote. If Bush wins, he will certainly
    not have needed my vote, and if he loses, then all the
    people who voted for him must then kick themselves for wasting their
    time on a loser.

    And
    please don't object to my "selfish" cost-benefit calculation;
    if "everyone acted like me," then Browne would win.
    So there.

    "If
    you vote, you legitimize the governmental system."

    This
    objection concerns my self-proclaimed anarchism; the idea is that
    I'm inconsistent if I vote at all. While I certainly sympathize
    with and do not criticize those anarchists who choose not to vote
    as a matter of principle, they cannot fault me for my choice
    to vote for a third party longshot. We are all trapped in a vicious
    system in which 51% of our neighbors can decide to steal our money,
    take away our guns, and send us off to die in foreign lands. If
    this evil machine contains an off-button – namely, that we can decide
    to not use its tyrannical powers – then I'm all for exercising
    this option. If I were in a Nazi concentration camp, about to be
    shot for my alleged Jewish background, I would not hesitate to point
    out that I am from Irish Catholic stock. This certainly wouldn't
    mean that I agreed with the Nazi system.

    "Harry
    Browne is not a true libertarian. He's for taxes."

    It's
    true, Harry Browne isn't the ideal candidate. But he does
    provide a very good focal point for liberty-minded dissenters. As
    everyone repeatedly tells me, Browne is not going to win,
    so his impurities are irrelevant. No one is going to mistake my
    vote for Browne as a disgruntled plea for taxation.

    If
    my listener allows me to elaborate, I explain that I will continue
    to vote for Browne (or whomever the Libertarian Party nominates)
    until that point at which I think he might actually win.
    Then I'll switch to a new, even more radical candidate, who doesn't
    stand a chance of winning. Like Lew Rockwell.

    But
    by this point, my listener has already walked away, sorry he even
    asked.

    July
    14, 2000

    Bob
    Murphy is a graduate student in New York City.

    Email Print
    Share