Curing Cancer: A Patent Impossibility
by
Bill Walker
by Bill Walker
DIGG THIS
The good news
this month is that a Canadian team under Dr. Michelakis at the University
of Ottawa has discovered that a simple, inexpensive chemical is
a powerful anticancer agent, effective against a broad range of
cancers. (Read their paper in the January Cancer
Cell, subscription required). The bad news is that it is a simple,
inexpensive chemical long used in medicine, and is not patentable.
Thus there is no mechanism for getting the chemical (dichloroacetate,
DCA) past the billion-dollar barrier of FDA approval. (The FDA actually
only
approved 17 drugs last year, and the drug industry spent 40
billion dollars on R&D).
Scientists
have known since 1930 that cancer cells use glycolysis instead of
aerobic respiration for energy. In other words, they don’t turn
on their mitochondria and burn their glucose with oxygen, as do
normal cells; they just convert it to lactic acid. While glycolysis
provides about fifteen times less energy per blood sugar molecule,
it works under the oxygen-deprived conditions inside early tumors.
It also has the advantage of bypassing the mitochondria entirely,
which allows the cancer cells to suppress the cell’s self-destruct
mechanisms.
DCA forces
the cell to turn on its mitochondria. This was the primary medical
use of DCA in the past, to treat patients with rare metabolic deficiencies.
For a normal cell, being "forced" to turn on mitochondria
isn’t such a big deal… they’re already on.
But for a cancer
cell, the mitochondria are time bombs. When the cancer’s mitochondria
turn on, they run out of control, creating high hydrogen peroxide
levels inside the mitochondria. This leads to a cascade of chemical
reactions that eventually activates two different self-destruct
("apoptosis") pathways in the cell.
The ability
to reactivate self-destruction is one of the "holy grails"
of cancer research. There are other approaches to induce apoptosis
in cancer cells, and perhaps some of them would actually work if
they were combined with DCA. Also, even if it is eventually found
that cancer can mutate and develop DCA resistance, the long period
of regression could allow newer but slow anticancer concepts (such
as telomerase inhibition) to finish off the remaining cancer cells.
So far Dr.
Michelakis has demonstrated the effectiveness of DCA against various
human cancer cell lines in a cell culture, and against human tumors
growing on immune-suppressed rats. The drug has already been tested
on human beings for many years as a treatment for a genetic enzyme
deficiency. There are millions of terminal cancer victims on this
planet. So, logically, the next step would be to find some volunteers
and start trying to find the optimum human dose range, combinations
of other apoptosis inducers that work synergistically with DCA,
supplements to reduce side effects, etc.
Logically in
our libertarian minds, perhaps. In the real world, nothing of the
kind will happen. The FDA will not allow people in the orderly and
profitable process of agonizing death by incurable cancers to try
nonapproved drugs. No drug company, no matter how large, can afford
to spend a billion dollars and 19 years getting a nonpatentable
treatment through the bureaucratic minefield. There is no FDA-approved
way to get there from here.
Someday a dedicated
medical team working beyond the reach of the FDA (perhaps in Mainland
China, which already contains numerous clinics that cater to foreign
medical refugees) will defeat cancer1. In the intervening years
or decades, terminal cancer patients in the US will be restricted
to the same old patent medicines.
Note
- If you’re
a dedicated medical team working beyond the reach of the FDA,
the rats in the study were given the same dose of DCA as human
patients with enzyme disorders, 50100 milligrams of drug
per kilogram of body weight, dissolved in their water.
January
22, 2007
Bill
Walker [send him mail]
works in HIV and gene therapy research in Rochester, Minnesota.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Bill
Walker: Archives
|