Googling World Energy Reserves
by
Bill Walker
by Bill Walker
A lot of concerned
people emailed me to say that we MUST be running out of energy,
because so many authoritative-looking people say so on TV. Here’s
the result of ten minutes of Googling (it will take longer if you
beer-Google) on "World Energy Reserves":
Conventional
fossil fuels (from British
Petroleum, "reserves available at existing economic and
operational conditions," i.e. not oil shales or other more
expensive petroleum ores):
Oil: 161.9
billion tonnes (annual use 3.8 billion tonnes)
Natural
Gas: 179.5 trillion cubic meters (annual use 2.7 trillion cubic
meters)
Coal: 909
billion tonnes (annual use 2.8 billion tonnes)
Nuclear
fission (from DOE
estimates):
Uranium:
~11.5 million tonnes
Thorium:
~34.5 million tonnes
One metric ton (tonne) of uranium completely fissioned equals approximately
2 million tonnes of oil. So our 46 million tonnes of currently available
nuclear fuel is roughly equal to 92 trillion tonnes of oil, or 24,000
years of world oil usage. (Or perhaps “hydrogen usage”,
or “beamed-energy usage” would be more accurate; while
nuclear energy could be used to make gasoline out of coal or oil
shale, if we do it for a thousand years we shall find ourselves
running low on oxygen!)
These are just
the reserves available with our current technology at our current
prices (actually, with 1970s technology… the US hasn’t started construction
of any reactors since 1978). It does assume that we actually recycle
the nuclear fuel efficiently, instead of continuing Jimmy Carter’s
policy of forcing the power companies to declare the uranium and
plutonium in fuel rods to be "waste." Currently, US nuclear
power plants are forced to operate at 0.5 % fuel efficiency, and
do not breed more fuel out of thorium. Then the enforced inefficiency
(and potential danger, from piles of unrecycled fuel) is used to
justify the 12-billion-dollar boondoggle called Yucca Mountain.
It is just
possible that nuclear power might get a teensy bit cheaper as time
went on if some of the plants were allowed to be 150% efficient
21st-century fast-neutron breeders instead of 0.5% efficient
1970s relics. It is also possible that electric power might be cheaper
if it were produced by competing free-market companies instead of
government-granted monopolies. Of course this would lead to the
inherent problems of unrestricted capitalism. For instance, if there
had been competing electric companies in New Orleans during Katrina,
it would have caused terrible inequalities. Not everyone’s power
would have gone off and stayed off for months (in fact no one’s
power would have stayed off for months, because they would have
switched companies). The same would be true in wartime or other
emergency; the inefficient duplications of capitalism would mean
that not all power would be knocked out in a city at the same time.
Unthinkable, of course (though in the early days of electric power,
there were no monopolies, and users often owned the wires and bought
power from competing power plants…).
Fusion:
ah, now the concerned emails start flowing in earnest. "We
don’t know how to use fusion, and it’s impossible for mere humans
to invent a way." Wrong. There is already an operational fusion
reactor powering the global economy, and it produces 28 trillion
times more raw energy than all man-made energy sources combined.
So even if some future "UN NRC" forever bans the helium-3
+ deuterium reactor, we can still expand our energy use by a factor
of 28 trillion, and maintain it for the next five billion years
or so.
Yes, it would
be incredibly inefficient compared to artificial fusion reactors,
but using 1960s
nuclear rocket technology we could surround the Sun with orbiting
solar collectors by the time we run out of uranium on the Earth
(there’s the small problem of finding enough silicon for the solar
cells, but the fusion reactors can make it out of Jupiter’s hydrogen…
oh, right, we’re pretending that fusion can’t be done. We would
have to settle for a few million times the present world energy
output if we restrict ourselves to using the asteroid belt and minor
planets. But only if the "Leif Erickson gene" is lost
and we never leave this particular natural fusion reactor to visit
others…).
Even today
a few percent of the world’s electric power comes from the sun’s
fusion energy, at such sites as Three
Gorges Dam and European windmill
farms. And much as I love to tease solar cell enthusiasts (especially
at night), solar cells get better almost as fast as computers. They’ll
be ready for prime time by the time we have to use the monoliths
to make the silicon out of Jupiter…
There are already
thousands of cost-effective, mass-produced man-made fusion reactors
as well; they are fueled by lithium deuteride. Unfortunately, they
are all owned by governments (or perhaps government-funded "terrorist
groups"), and they are sitting on top of missiles or in bombers,
waiting to slaughter millions of people apiece at the whim of various
politicians. But these fusion reactors (popularly know as "H-bombs")
are not intrinsically evil. While they are not suited to steady
production of electric power, they can be used for many valuable,
even life-saving industrial purposes.
One of the
essential requirements for successful environmental stewardship
is to keep the ecology from being blown up by asteroid impacts.
The existing 25-megaton city-killers would be quite suitable for
deflecting extinction asteroids. They would also be useful for forcing
asteroids and comets to hit the CO2 polar caps of Mars and induce
Global Warming there. If all the CO2 polar caps on Mars were sublimated,
the little planet would have an atmosphere half as thick as Earth’s.
That’s plenty good for green plants (which will quickly convert
much of the CO2 to oxygen, of course), so you Luddites who don’t
think that anyone can invent a fusion reactor will have somewhere
to build your log cabins and plow behind your genetically-altered
Mars Mules. (The Earth will long have been 99% powered by He-3 fusion
reactors, so you’ll have to move to maintain your belief system.)
But enough
"no-technological-progress-ever" nonsense. The fact is
that the world is full of young engineers, and new energy sources
are being constructed all the time. The Russians are using new fuel
designs to beat their nuclear
swords into economic plowshares (and breed fuel out of abundant
thorium at the same time). The Chinese, Indians, Koreans, Japanese,
etc. etc. are all into improved nuclear power technologies. Almost
the only nations not likely to build new-technology nuclear plants
on a large scale are the US foreign-aid dictatorships in Africa,
and the US itself. Even oil-rich Iran is moving into nuclear energy
as fast as it can.
The US political
class can (and does) make energy vastly more expensive for Americans.
They can invade oil-producing nations like Iraq and shut down their
oil industry. They can (and have) prevent Americans from building
any new oil refineries or nuclear reactors for decades. But they
can’t alter the geology of the Earth, or the laws of physics, and
they can’t stop people in rogue
states that really do have WMDs from doing anything they damn
well please.
A quick look
at the world’s nuclear
research programs shows that there are many nations that have
breeder reactor technology in commercial prototypes already… and
several of these countries are fresh out of socialist economic nonexistence.
A few more years of even the most tainted capitalism, and they’ll
have nuclear reactors that are at least 60-70% fuel-efficient, compared
with our 0.5% "Jimmy Carter Specials." The nations that
want energy will get energy, whether the US political class approves
or not.
This all assumes,
too, that no one ever invents any new energy sources. This assumes
that we know everything about Physics, mining technology, transportation
systems, nuclear reactor design, etc. After all, we’ve had nuclear
power for… less than a human lifetime. Surely we know everything
by now, right?
The truth is
that Googling can’t find most "World Energy Reserves."
Energy reserves are created by human minds out of the raw materials
of nature. Most of these reserves will be the creations of the minds
of people that aren’t even born yet. All we can do on Google is
find out the rock-bottom LOWER limit for our energy reserves. The
lower limit is enough to build interstellar civilizations and go
on to find the "World Energy Reserves" of the Milky Way.
I wonder where the real upper limit is?
December
12, 2005
Bill
Walker [send him mail]
works in HIV and gene therapy research in Rochester, Minnesota.
Copyright
© 2005 LewRockwell.com
Bill
Walker: Archives
|