How
To Handle Getting Fired
by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
DIGG THIS
Wired
Magazine this month offers a few pointers on how to disguise
on your résumé the fact that you have been fired.
The main point is to come up with a negotiated settlement that has
you resigning from your job. Many employers will go along with these
because they fear litigation. There will be no "wrongful termination"
lawsuits if you are on record as having left voluntarily.
I
don't dispute this advice. It seems fine enough. But it doesn't
deal with the much more important matter of how to handle being
fired from a psychological and sociological point of view. The truth
is that getting fired is one of the best things that can ever happen
to you, if you look at it the right way. There is no reason to consider
it the end of the world. It can be the beginning of great things.
The key to understanding this is to zoom in on the nature of a
labor contract. It is an agreement based on the expectation of mutual
cooperation that betters the lot of both the employer and the employee.
In a world without scarcity, the employer would rather do all work
alone and not have to hire anyone. This would save resources, and,
in any case, most employers figure that they can do a better job
than anyone than they can hire, and, often, they are right.
The very existence of institutions that are larger than sole proprietorships
grows out of the need to divide the labor. Even if the employer
is the best sweeper, web development, accountant, and market expert
in the world, it is to his advantage to specialize in one area while
farming out the other tasks, even if these tasks will not be done
as well by others. Every employer, then, regards the hiring decision
with a combination of dread (no one wants to waste money!) and relief
(finally I can get something done around here!).
It is critically important for the employee to understand that
he is doing no favors to the employer by working there, nor is the
employer to be regarded as a generous distributor of funds, much
less someone who is under some positive moral obligation to dish
out. The employee is there because the nature of the world and the
ubiquity of the scarcity of time and resources make it necessary.
In order for there to be peace amidst this arrangement, there must
be mutual benefit, always.
When that mutual benefit ceases to exist, it is in the interest
of both parties to dissolve the relationship. The employee can leave
for greener pastures. In the same way, the boss can stop paying
the employee in exchange for services that he no longer believes
are a benefit to the company. To be fired only means that the employer
takes the initiative in ceasing to fund further engagement. Both
or either side of this exchange could be wrong, of course, but all
human decision-making is speculative, and we can only act on the
information we have.
Why would anyone want to hang around at a dinner party at which
he is not wanted? It's the same way with a labor contract. If you
aren't wanted, you should walk away and consider yourself better
off as a result. No lawsuits, no complaints, no bitterness, no acts
of vengeance. Just a clean and happy break.
Doesn't the reason you are fired matter? Not really. The employer
doesn't always know the reason. He just knows it is not working
out from his point of view, and he is perfectly within his rights
to terminate the prior agreement.
Let me tell a quick story from my own work history. When I was
in clothing sales, I was one of the top-ranked salesmen on the floor,
but I didn't always see eye to eye with the owner-boss. One Christmas
season, he told all the salespeople that all alterations had to
be promised out three weeks from the date they were sold. That struck
me as outrageous.
Sure enough, within the next hour, I had a customer come in to
buy seven pricey suits, on the condition that all alterations were
to be done within the week. Now, I should have gone to the boss
and asked him. He would have said no, I'm quite sure. So I didn't:
I went ahead and promised the suits out. At closing time, the boss
found the tickets and threw all seven suits at me and demanded to
know "who is going to alter these?"
I said, "I will," and I promptly hit the sewing machines and began
to sew. I had them all finished by 9pm that evening. I brought them
in to him and said that I would deliver them to the customer personally
in the morning. My boss said, that's great, and added: "after that,
I won't need your services anymore."
Was he wrong or right? He was wrong that firing me was good for
his business. But he was right that he could not countenance an
insubordinate employee, and just as a tip to the worker: there is
no surer way to make yourself unwelcome than to be insubordinate.
Even from a business point of view, he needed a staff that would
follow his orders, right or wrong. Hey, it's not my style but it
was his clothing store, for goodness sake. (I ended up as a manager
in another store and we outcompeted his store in every season that
followed.)
Being fired does not mean that your time with the company was a
waste. In the time you were there, both you and your boss benefited
in some way. Conditions changing doesn't negate that reality. The
boss gained a worker. And you gained valuable experience – and one
of the most valuable experiences is the shock of being fired. Sometimes
it is the best way to get a person's attention. We all need improvement,
and experiencing outright rejection provides a poignant reminder
of this fact, and an impetus to change.
You might feel anger and even hatred. You might want to curse out
your boss. You might plan a lawsuit (which seems to be everyone's
first reaction). Instead, you need to do something completely counterintuitive.
You need to thank your boss for having had confidence in you and
for giving you the opportunity to work there. You need to say this
as sincerely as you can. And when you see your boss at the grocery
store or sports event in the future, you should bound up to him
as if he were an old friend and thank him again.
If you do this, there might come a time in the future – in fact,
almost certainly – when this person will be in a position to recommend
you for a job. He is far more likely to do so. In fact, he might
be so impressed at your magnanimity that he will offer you your
job back. You can politely turn him down, if you so wish. The point
is that there is nothing productive about resentment or hate, any
more than you should hate the convenience store from which you no
longer buy milk. You once benefited from exchange and you no longer
perceive the advantage in doing so. Big deal.
If it makes it any easier, let us remember that you were most likely
paid more than you contributed to the firm. Wages work this way.
I can recall that I worked with some jerk who refused to straighten
inventory in the back room. "For minimum wage, I won't do this."
But the truth is that he was paid far more than he gave back. Employers
often pay wages in advance of productivity, hoping that they are
making some kind of investment in the future. It is only later that
you become productive enough to make it worth it for him, at which
point he has to raise your wage in the anticipation of future productivity.
So there is a sense in which everyone is indebted to the employer.
The worst fate to befall the American labor market came after World
War Two when employees began to think of all jobs as lifetime jobs
– the way they are in economically backward and decaying Europe
today. In a free market, we would hop from job to job without any
problem. Employers would freely hire and fire, trying people out
the way we try on shoes, and employees would be the same way. In
this way, we are most likely to find the right fit, and our places
of work would become less contentious places of happiness and peace.
Nothing is more absurd than the attempt to restrict the right to
fire. Voluntarism goes both ways. The employee can leave, and the
employer can fire. Any other system, such as one that would restrict
either action, is an act of coercion that diminishes the well-being
of both sides.
Thinking
of our kids here and their job experiences, we should hope that
they get fired from at least one job or several in their early work
years. Being fired reminds us of our obligations, the contractual
nature of work, and the need for agreement and voluntarism in all
social relations. The act of getting fired underscores the existence
of the freedom of association, which is the key to social peace
and a foundation of a growing economy. Do your part and take it
well.
July
31, 2007
Jeffrey
Tucker [send him mail]
is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.
Comment on
the Mises blog.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Jeffrey
Tucker Archives
|