Teacher
for a Day
by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
by Jeffrey A. Tucker
How
awful we were to substitute teachers when I was in grade school!
These "substitutes" the very term implied dread mixed with malicious
opportunity didn't know our names, our lesson plans, the class culture,
and had no pre-existing expectations for our behavior. We took full
advantage, switching seats, hurling paper wads, goofing off, or
otherwise just having a grand and very cruel time of it, knowing
that if we all behaved badly as a class, in the aggregate, the punishment
would be minimal. It was never worse than the day in band when we
all switched instruments, and generated an hour worth of cacophony.
To what end? It was just something we did because we could.
Justice
dictates that everyone who participated in these evil acts should
be a substitute teacher for day. And so I was, but not in the same
setting I had growing up. Instead I enjoy what turned out to be
a glorious morning for Dad and his well-trained and homeschooled
children. There were no spitwads or wisecracks or seat switching
(that I know of!); rather I was privileged to be of part of one
of the most beautiful scenes I've witnessed in my adult life.
Sure,
I teach them on nights and weekends, mostly "extracurricular" subjects
like music and sports and yardwork. During the real school hours,
I'm somewhere else. So the chance to sit down with them during a
real school day and supervise the process of learning in a homeschool
setting was a rare treat, and something I would wish on every homeschool
dad, who often feels that professional responsibilities shut him
out of the schooling process.
How
to characterize the experience? I turn to a word from Catholic spirituality:
sacramental. In Catholic theology, a sacrament like Baptism or Communion
gives grace ex opere operato, that is, they operate of themselves.
A sacramental such as a prayer or holy water, in contrast, gives
grace ex opera operantis, that is, due to the good disposition
of the person involved. The word is usually employed in reference
to holy objects or actions or just events that provide a window
to sanctity. The term applies here. Time spent in homeschool, in
a world so barren of reflection on the need to develop from within,
is a
kind of sacramental.
Let
me set the scene and you will see why. It began after breakfast
with my passing and slightly nervous comment that we should start
school now, but they knew precisely what that meant. They stopped
talking, put away their breakfast plates, and got out their books
and papers and sat down in front of me, awaiting instructions or
to gain a sense of what I expected of them. Somewhat startled by
this and feeling very much on the spot, I went around the table
and asked each what subjects needed to be covered today and what
was expected. Each dutifully reported in, and then I put them to
work.
For
the next hours, their young minds were hard at work in a setting
of incredible peace. A few words from me, and one could only hear
the sound of pencils on paper, interrupted periodically by questions
about specific issues. The children sought direction but they understood
that the job of learning was theirs alone. Once the reading or worksheet
on a particular topic was done, the child then moved onto another
subject, and another and another, guided only periodically by brief
pointers and instructions. Onward through geography, math, spelling,
history, and on and on each child working on his or her particular
level. When a child finishes a task particularly quickly and with
a nearly perfect score, it is a sign to move onto a more advanced
area, as happened with my daughter in Latin and my son with math.
Each time, it involved short explanations and then assignments and
reading. Meanwhile, the little one was busy at her school, copying
letters.
Amid
this peace and space, I taught each one something that day, made
a personal contribution to their intellectual growth, and assisted
as they piled new knowledge on top of old and sorted through the
process of weaving it all together, a bit at a time. My role was
only to give due attention to the particular needs and personalities
of each child. We were all learning together. Here we had a visible
sign of a kind of hierarchy: the younger children striving to know
what the older ones know, bit by bit, feeling not frustrated but
challenged. And at the top of the hierarchy, there is no dispute
(at least not yet) about who held that spot: the teacher, who feels
himself to be oddly flattered by being considered as such.
People
who have never witnessed a homeschooling scene, but know only about
school from large classrooms in public school, have a hard time
even imagining what goes on or how it all works. This is so clear
whenever you read a mainstream educator denounce homeschooling;
their ignorance is palpable, and barely worth responding to. How
could they know what I saw before me? The students are internally
driven to learn. They sense no limits to learning. Once one topic
is mastered, they are free to move on. They feel a powerful sense
of personal responsibility. Time is used extraordinarily well, not
standing in lines or frittering away hours obeying orders from above,
but learning, and it was all over long before I expected.
In
the middle of this, I was having flashbacks to elementary school,
and I realized some things I hadn't thought about before. Something
internalized by all kids in public school is the rule that one must
keep up with the class, be part of the group, contribute to the
collective mind of those assembled. Particular talents and unusual
interests just have no place in school. As for moving on in the
book, what's the point? It only means boredom later. And what's
the goal? To learn? Not really. The goal is get a final score that
doesn't alarm mom and dad, keep away from detention, and then to
move on to the next grade.
Boredom
is the main feeling I recall. You are strapped into a wooden chair
from 8am until 3pm or later, with a break during which you can stand
in a line for lunch, followed by a time for play during which you
are harassed by bullies and otherwise subjected to every manner
of uncivilized behavior from classmates before returning to the
wooden chair to be bored again. What does one do with one's time?
You kill it in every way possible. You can daydream. You can practice
going brain dead. You can conjure up every manner of thought, good
and evil. What you cannot do is learn at your own pace. You cannot
explore. Keep up with the class, and never go beyond it, is the
rule. Whatever you do, don't think things others are not thinking.
Every student is profoundly aware of what thoughts are allowed and
what is not allowed (and homeschooling is sometimes decried as too
narrow and restrictive!).
A
word about the effects of competition: it is often said that only
the large group setting of peers encourages rivalry toward excellence.
I never saw this in school. Instead I saw the opposite: a reversion
to the mean. Competition implies rewards for excelling. But in the
public school, it is the opposite. Extraordinary work calls down
suspicion from peers and slight irritation from the teacher who,
whatever his or her own merits, is, after all, part of a system
that is designed to bring about conformity and discourage outlying
behavior and thought.
I
believe in competition as a principle but not as a universal rule
of life. A child's mind is already so expansive and nimble that
the real danger is giving them examples of passable mediocrity.
Without that to limit them, a child is naturally inquisitive and
enraptured by opportunities to know more. The great merit of homeschooling
is precisely that it provides an open-ended environment that permits
the flowering of intellect that is as effortless in children as
it is difficult in adults. Observing this at work, one is tempted
to establish a first rule of education: set no limits (within moral
bounds) to learning.
As
I sat and looked at my children so hard at work, viewing learning
an individualized process of discovery and challenge, it was clear
to me that they have no idea just how good they have it. Fine. Better
that they take learning for granted, just part of life that has
no clear beginning or clear end. What grace comes to those who make
it possible, who put in the time to become the private tutors of
their own children, who benefit so much, intellectually and spiritually,
from seeing the process at work and participating so closely in
it.
The
mystery of the mind: how magnificent to see the internal drama of
intellectual development take place in children, in a setting of
the home where they are safe and loved. How privileged are those
who can take part. And how good the students are to those who teach
them, even when they are substitutes. Holy water, prayers, icons,
spiritual readings these are sacramentals. They give grace because
of the disposition we and others bring to them, and so too does
showing love to one's children by teaching them at home and having
them show love back. In that little space, that small table the
children sat around to develop their minds, hearts, and souls, here
was an event taking place that is more important than anything in
the world.
I
would gladly be a substitute in this class at every opportunity.
November
15, 2003
Jeffrey
Tucker is editorial vice president of www.Mises.org.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Jeffrey
Tucker Archives
|