Robert Shiller’s Fatal Prescriptions
by
Michael S. Rozeff
by Michael S. Rozeff
Economist Robert
Shiller now prescribes a strong dose of medicine – actually poison
– for the U.S. economy (see here).
Shiller’s diagnosis and doctoring are the same as those of the Bush-Obama-Bernanke
regimes. He only wants greater and more persistent doses of the
poisons.
Shiller’s policies
will crush the realization of the American entrepreneurial spirit,
and even that spirit itself, as they crush the economy. They continue
on a larger scale the process of destroying the foundations of American
greatness that began with the Progressive movement.
Shiller champions
government authority over the economy. In this regard, he is at
once socialist, fascist, authoritarian, and statist. He speaks against
the rising backlash of popular sentiment against swallowing these
bitter authoritarian "remedies." He writes to bolster
the hand and will of government officials, so that they do not cave
in to public pressures.
Shiller wants
consistent government and FED pump-priming. He wants it on a "sufficient
scale and for sufficient time," which means much more of it
for a much longer time. Shiller is a true believer in these measures.
He wants far more government spending and far more lending by the
FED. He wants them on "a continuing and even larger scale."
He sees no
dangers from these spending and lending policies, orchestrated by
government. The only danger he sees is in their frustration by an
angered public that is rising in protest. These protests, he fears,
will cause "damage to our system."
Shiller is
a highly useful idiot for Obama and Geithner and Summers and Romer
and Bernanke. He cheerleads them. His extreme version of their policies
makes them seem reasonable and moderate to the untutored, if that
is possible.
Shiller proposes
the massive expansion and extension of the State into the American
economy "to get us out of the current economic slump, and to
restore confidence." This is utter nonsense. The economy would
not have tumbled and would long since have been recovering had the
government stayed out of it altogether. American confidence is legendary.
Americans are ready at any time to take and manage risks. Only concerted
government policies can bypass and undermine this American characteristic.
In all of what
he proposes, Shiller lacks all good sense and judgment. He lacks
all balance. He fails to understand the economy. He fails to understand
the public’s outrage. He fails to understand what made America great.
He fails to understand that his remedies are poisons to the nation
and the economy. Shiller, in other words, is a fool. And he is a
dangerous fool, because he has a reputation and obtains a wide hearing.
He joins a chorus of fools that includes Obama, Geithner, Summers,
Romer, and Bernanke.
The business
of America is business. From the outset, this has been true. The
American spirit has a very strong entrepreneurial component. This
has been true since the first Pilgrims struck out to a new and unknown
wilderness, after having indebted themselves to make the voyage.
American towns were founded by entrepreneurs. They invested their
own funds. They recruited settlers. They risked capital on meetinghouses
and trading posts. They negotiated with the native peoples. They
traded with them and with foreign peoples. They hired ministers.
They governed. They often took on military duties. This is historical
fact, as documented by Edwin J. Perkins in his article "The
Entrepreneurial Spirit in Colonial America."
The entrepreneurial
spirit is widespread among Americans, at all income levels and in
all stations of life. The government has been trying to kill that
spirit by degrees for a long time. It has partially succeeded. The
greatest danger to America is that the government will one day entirely
succeed and change the American character altogether by extinguishing
its entrepreneurial drive. When Americans rise up against their
government’s policies, there are many reasons, oft unspoken, and
one of them is the instinct, not yet dead, that these policies are
anti-American in a deep way.
Americans want
to get ahead. That shows the entrepreneurial spirit. They believe
they can get ahead. They abhor waste and inequities, such as are
embodied in the lending and spending bailouts of several administrations.
They like progress. They have tolerated impositions for far too
long because they also value order, and there have not been any
clear paths within the system to remedy its defects. Massive impositions
rightly catalyze public anger. This is as it should be. Far from
being a danger, it reflects a residual degree of entrepreneurial
spirit among Americans, severely wounded, but not mortally.
Government
lending and spending policies on a massive scale go directly against
the enterprises of entrepreneurs. They replace them with rule by
bureaucracies. They spell the death of a key pillar of American
life. This is what Shiller fails to see and fails to understand.
He thinks Americans cannot survive a deep recession. He asserts
that their confidence will fail them. All the historical evidence
contradicts Shiller, from day one. Americans are a hardy people
who are used to surviving hardships. Government has not yet completely
wrecked them, although it has made inroads. There is an enormous
latent potential there. There is an enormous subterranean reservoir
of energy waiting to be tapped. Shiller wants to suppress it for
the sake of maintaining his system, which is a corrupt and enervating
system.
He belongs
to a set of intellectuals whose thinking Americans should have rejected
long ago and need to reject now. They have attained power, and they
are running America into the ground.
I know of no
easy social and political solution to our problems. I know of no
magical formula to achieve restoration of values that have been
waylaid and tossed aside. But I think that it will be essential
for Americans to unloose the dormant and suppressed entrepreneurial
spirit and allow it to flourish once again. And to do that, they
will have to recognize and reject the forces of suppression represented
by the policies of people like Robert Shiller.
April
16, 2009
Michael
S. Rozeff [send him mail]
is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Michael
S. Rozeff Archives
|