Suffering
in Santa Monica
by
Llewellyn H. Rockwell,
Jr.
Saint
Monica is the 4th century mother of Augustine, who endured
anguish while her son embraced sin and heresy before his conversion
to sound doctrine.
Santa
Monica, California, is a fancy beach town that, for decades, has
succumbed to every temptation against sound economic principles,
and the latest outrage is going to cause anguish like never before.
This
past week, the city council passed a "Living Wage" measure
that requires a minimum wage of $10.50, which is a 68 percent increase
over the state-mandated living wage. But it doesn’t apply to everyone:
it is imposed against the most profitable businesses only.
If
you operate in the tourist area on the beach or downtown, and your
revenues are $5 million and up, you must pay the wage. In addition,
the law imposes a mandate that employers pay health-insurance coverage
up to $1.75 per hour, increasing to $2.50 per hour in July 2003.
Anticipating
that businesses would likely cut back hours and employees under
the strain of the law, it further mandates that employers not "retaliate"
against them. Many businesses face the choice of either cutting
the hours they are open or closing their doors. The precise fallout
is difficult to predict: there will surely be a massive reshuffling
of labor resources, but the basis on which it will happen will not
be economic but political.
Nonetheless,
the "Living Wage Movement" is celebrating. About 50 such
laws exist around the country but they all apply to government institutions
and contractors. This is the first time in the US that such a law
has been imposed against private business. Hence, the pathetic socialists,
forever looking for evidence that History is on their side, can
delude themselves for another day that their stupid laws constitute
"progress."
That
such a law is bad for business, and bad for employees, is incredibly
obvious. If increasing wages is as easy as passing laws, why not
raise the living wage to $50 per hour? Why not $500 per hour? Somehow
the city council understands that this would be over-the-top and
cause bankruptcy and rampant corruption. Why, then, should any steps
toward that end be taken?
The
city council hasn’t figured out the basic economic principle that
the only way to raise wages over the long run is to allow the free
market to work. Capital investment increases to correspond with
consumer demand and businesses find themselves in a position to
make higher bids for quality employees. But this happens through
a process of development that can’t be rushed through legislation.
Imagine
the perverse incentives this creates for a business with $49 million
in annual revenues, or for a developer who might consider taking
over a beach-front business to make it run more efficiently. Suddenly,
he is faced with vast new labor costs. Consider the costs of maid
service alone: one maid can clean 14 rooms in an eight-hour shift,
which means that an entire crew is required to operate one of these
places.
The
law will be challenged in court on grounds of equal protection.
The problem is that a business just across the street will not be
subject to the law, which is grossly unfair. The injustice of it
all nicely illustrates the leftist view of justice: mistreat the
successful and reward and subsidize the less successful. Apply the
principle across the board, and you can destroy an entire civilization.
Now,
why in the world would a city council do something that is so obviously
self destructive? St. Monica asked that question when her son was
hip-deep in the Manichean heresy, which required its followers to
become environmentalists and sit under melon trees waiting for food
to drop. The answer, which isn’t quite an explanation, is mental
and moral blindness. The mask that covers their eyes is socialist
ideology undergirded by the sin of envy.
People
must have come to Augustine and said: "Why are you following
this con-man called Mani? Don’t you know that he is a loon?"
Augustine dismissed these critics as tools of the Catholic Church.
So
too do the Santa Monica socialists disregard even the most reasonable
skeptic as a tool of the beach-front capitalists who fail to envision
the beautiful new socialist world they are creating right there
in Santa Monica.
This
is hardly the first nutty law this city council has passed. It has
wrecked the place with rent controls that subsidize the rich and
famous, while passing pro-homeless laws that have drawn the riffraff
from every skid row in Southern California. The place looks like
a third-world banana republic, with the super rich walking the streets
next to squalor. Folks, this isn’t the bourgeois America that Tocqueville
described.
Why
can’t the city council see the obvious? Again, blindness is the
reason. We see the same blindness in the Supreme Court, the US Congress,
and the thousands of government agencies that daily try to regulate
our lives for our own good. No matter how much coercion they impose,
no matter how many failures they spawn, they stick to their program
of attacking liberty and property while dismissing their critics
as malicious.
It
was the prayers of St. Monica, and the preaching of St. Ambrose,
that finally freed Augustine from his attachment to nutty religious
heresies.
When
he finally came home to the faith of his childhood, he cried to
God: "Too
late have I loved Thee!" But it wasn’t really too late, because
he entered the Kingdom of Heaven.
So
too can Santa Monica enter the civilized world. It is not too late.
The city council only needs to take off its blinders, embrace the
idea of freedom, and let the market take care of the rest. Until
that happens, the city will continue to sit under a melon tree waiting
for food to drop.
June
1, 2001
Llewellyn
H. Rockwell, Jr. [send
him mail], is president of the Ludwig
von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. He also edits a daily
news site, LewRockwell.com.
Copyright
© 2001 LewRockwell.com
Lew
Rockwell Archives
|