Little
War Criminals Get Punished, Big Ones Don’t
by
Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts
DIGG THIS
National Public
Radio has been spending much news time on Darfur in Western Sudan
where a great deal of human suffering and death are occurring. The
military conflict has been brought on in part by climate change,
according to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. Drought is forcing
nomads in search of water into areas occupied by other claimants.
No doubt the conflict is tribal and racial as well. The entire catastrophe
is overseen by a government with few resources other than bullets.
Now an International
Criminal Court prosecutor wants to bring charges against Sudan’s
president, Omar al-Bashir, for crimes against humanity and war crimes.
I have no sympathy
for people who make others suffer. Nevertheless, I wonder at the
International Criminal Court’s pick from the assortment of war criminals?
Why al-Bashir?
Is it because
Sudan is a powerless state, and the International Criminal Court
hasn’t the courage to name George W. Bush and Tony Blair as war
criminals?
Bush and Blair’s
crimes against humanity in Iraq and Afghanistan dwarf, at least
in the number of deaths and displaced persons, the terrible situation
in Darfur. The highest estimate of Darfur casualties is 400,000,
one-third the number of Iraqis who have died as a result of Bush’s
invasion. Moreover, the conflict in the Sudan is an internal one,
whereas Bush illegally invaded two foreign countries, war crimes
under the Nuremberg Standard. Bush’s war crimes were enabled by
the political leaders of the UK, Spain, Canada, and Australia. The
leaders of every member of the "coalition of the willing to
commit war crimes" are candidates for the dock.
But of course
the Great Moral West does not commit war crimes. War crimes are
charges fobbed off on people demonized by the Western media, such
as the Serbian Milosevic and the Sudanese al-Bashir.
Every week
the Israeli government evicts Palestinians from their homes, steals
their land, and kills Palestinian women and children. These crimes
against humanity have been going on for decades. Except for a few
Israeli human rights organizations, no one complains about it. Palestinians
are defined as "terrorists," and "terrorists"
can be treated inhumanely without complaint.
Iraqis and
Afghans suffer the same fate. Iraqis who resist US occupation of
their country are "terrorists." Taliban is a demonized
name. Every Afghan killed – even those attending wedding parties
– is claimed to be Taliban by the US military. Iraqis and Afghans
can be murdered at will by American and NATO troops without anyone
raising human rights issues.
The International
Criminal Court is a bureaucracy. It has a budget, and it needs to
do something to justify its budget. Lacking teeth and courage, it
goes after the petty war criminals and leaves the big ones alone.
Don’t
get me wrong. I’m for holding all governments accountable for their
criminal actions. It is the hypocrisy to which I object. The West
gives itself and Israel a pass while damning everyone else. Even
human rights groups fall into the trap. Rights activists don’t see
the buffoonery in their complaint that President Bush, who has violated
more human rights than any person alive, is letting China off the
hook for human rights abuses by attending the Olympics hosted by
China.
President Bush
claims that the enormous destruction and death he has brought to
Iraq and Afghanistan are necessary in order for Americans to be
safe. If we are accepting excuses this feeble, Milosevic passed
muster with his excuse that as the head of state he was obliged
to try to preserve the state’s territorial integrity. Is al-Bashir
supposed to accept secession in the Sudan, something that Lincoln
would not accept from the Confederacy? How long would al-Bashir
last if he partitioned Sudan?
Last
October the Atlanta Journal-Constitution had a photo on its
front page above the fold of an elderly man with mikes shoved in
his face. Paul Henss, 85 years old, is being deported from the US,
where he has lived for 53 years, because Eli Rosenbaum, director
of the US State Department’s Nazi-hunting bureaucracy, declared
him a war criminal for training guard dogs used at German concentration
camps. Henss was 22 years old when World War II ended.
A kid who trained
guard dogs is being deported as a war criminal, but the head of
state who launched two wars of naked aggression, resulting in the
deaths of more than 1.2 million people, and who has the entire world
on edge awaiting his third war of aggression, this time against
Iran, is received respectfully by foreign governments. Corporations
and trade associations will pay him $100,000 per speech when he
leaves office. He will make millions of dollars more from memoirs
written by a ghostwriter.
Does no one
see the paradox of deporting Henss while leaving the war criminal
in the White House?
July
17, 2008
Paul
Craig Roberts [send
him mail] a
former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and former associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been reporting shocking cases
of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A new edition of his book,
The
Tyranny of Good Intentions,
co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how
Americans lost the protection of law, has just been released by
Random House.
Copyright
© 2008 Creators Syndicate
Paul
Craig Roberts Archives
|