Two Who Made a Difference
by
Paul Craig Roberts
by Paul Craig Roberts
America
lost two tax-cutting heroes last week former Wall Street Journal
editor Robert L. Bartley and former Republican senator from Delaware,
William Roth. I knew both men well, having worked with Roth and
his staff in creating the Kemp-Roth bill and having served on Bartley’s
editorial page.
Both
men did much for America: Roth cut tax rates, gave us the Roth IRA,
and championed the taxpayer against IRS abuse; Bartley acquainted
influential people with an alternative policy to Keynesian demand
management, which had mired the economy in stagflation.
Neither
Bartley nor Roth was afraid of controversy. Neither were they intimidated
by Machiavelli’s dictum that "there is nothing more difficult,
more perilous or more uncertain of success, than to take the lead
in introducing a new order of things."
Roth’s
death on the heel of Bartley’s reminds us that there was another
dimension to tax-cutting than editorial writing. Jude Wanniski was
such a successful publicist for supply-side economics that to this
day the folklore prevails over the reality. Editorials, curves drawn
on napkins and late night dinners in lower Manhattan may inspire
but alone cannot change U.S. economic policy. Another, parallel,
battle was going on in the policy corridors of Washington, D.C.
The
battle for supply-side economics was conducted in congressional
committees, in fights over budget resolutions on the floor of the
House and Senate, and in critiques of the economic models used to
justify Keynesian economic policy.
A
small group of U.S. Representatives, Senators, and congressional
staff carried the policy fight to the Keynesian establishment, which
controlled the enormous resources of the Office of Management and
Budget, the Treasury, the Congressional Budget Office, the Congressional
Research Service, and the staffs of the House and Senate Budget
committees, the Joint Economic Committee, the Joint Tax Committee,
the Ways & Means Committee, and the Senate finance Committee.
In
those days policy belonged to Democrats. To win, supply-siders had
to convince important Democrats, such as JEC chairman Lloyd Bentsen,
Finance Committee chairman Russell Long, and defense hawk Sam Nunn.
More
often than not, minority staffs and ranking minority members were
in the way. Most Republicans were in thrall of Wall Street advice
that tax cuts meant deficits and high interest rates and falling
stock and bond prices. Give us a balanced budget, they clamored,
even if you have to raise taxes to pay for spending.
The
Journal’s editorials reduced the influence of the Wall Street
economists. Bartley’s support was critical in 1981 when the Washington
establishment did its best to shut down the supply-siders in the
Treasury before the tax cut was safe.
I
joined the Journal’s editorial page in 1978 as Jude Wanniski’s
replacement. Fresh from the congressional staff where I drafted
the Kemp-Roth Bill and instructed Republicans in its use against
the Democrats’ budget resolutions, I was Bartley’s way of continuing
his investment in supply-side economics.
My
journalistic qualifications consisted of two recent articles, "The
Breakdown of the Keynesian Model" in The Public Interest,
and "Disguising the Tax Burden" in Harper’s. Both
articles were boat rockers. One challenged the efficacy of demand
management and the other showed that the revenues from the tax reform
plan of Senators Muskie and Kennedy would come out of the hide of
the middle class. This revelation got the attention of the morning
TV talk shows and Congress and killed the bill.
To
sign me on, Bartley offered a personal column, "Political Economy,"
and the title of Associate Editor of the Editorial Page. "Now,"
Bartley said, "no one can say you aren’t a journalist,"
and roared with laughter.
Bob
Bartley was ambitious. His ambition made him willing to take risks
with ideas and to surround himself with idea people. He encouraged
us to rock boats, to analyze and report, and to break news stories.
"Go to Washington and see what is going on," he would
urge.
Bartley
was appreciated also for his stalwartness in standing up to the
Soviets. But in recent years, his aggressive neoconservative foreign
policy lost him a certain amount of support. Bartley did not see
the paradox in his position of wanting to impose American values
on the world while simultaneously championing other policies open
borders, mass immigration and globalism that are dissolving America
herself.
Roth
and Bartley were instrumental in reviving the U.S. economy from
its malaise. They made a difference.
December
16, 2003
Dr. Roberts [send him mail]
is John M. Olin Fellow at the Institute for Political Economy, Senior
Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University,
and Research Fellow at the Independent Institute. He is a former
associate editor of the Wall
Street Journal and a former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury.
He is the co-author of The
Tyranny of Good Intentions.
Copyright
© 2003 Creators Syndicate
Paul
Craig Roberts Archives
|