Iran's Bomb
by
Charley
Reese
by Charley Reese
There's been
a lot of talk recently about Israel and/or the United States bombing
the nuclear facilities in Iran. I wouldn't worry about that. I believe
they are both bluffing.
In the first
place, just the talk has kicked up the price of oil. In the second
place, there is no proof that Iran really wants to develop nuclear
weapons. So far, what the Iranians have done and propose to do are
legal. They have a reasonable explanation for why they want to develop
nuclear power. Oil is their biggest and most valuable export. The
less they use for domestic purposes, the more they will have to
export.
On the other
hand, they are surrounded by nuclear powers Israel, Russia,
Pakistan, India and the U.S. (through its heavy presence in the
Persian Gulf and Iraq). So maybe they do want to develop a nuclear
bomb. Personally, I don't care if they do. Having lived most of
my life with 30,000 nuclear warheads and the means to deliver them
in the Soviet Union, I'm not going to worry about the Iranians having
six or seven.
I'm not one
of those people who think the world will end with a nuclear explosion.
There have been a lot of nuclear explosions. We dropped two on Japan,
and all the nuclear powers tested their bombs in the atmosphere
as well as underground. Despite the urban legends about plutonium,
we are all still here. A nuclear weapon is, after all, a bomb, and
like all bombs there is a limit to its radius of destruction. As
Brother Dave Gardner put it, the place to be when a nuclear bomb
goes off is wherever you can say, "What was that?"
In the meantime,
what the United States should do is talk to the Iranians, instead
of talking at them, threatening them and insulting them. Civil discourse
and honest diplomacy are too much to ask of this reckless and immature
administration, which, despite evidence to the contrary, seems to
believe it can bully the whole world into doing its bidding.
Right now,
the U.S. is banking on getting the International Atomic Energy Agency
to refer Iran to the U.N. Security Council. Winning this vote is
not a certainty, but even if the U.S. does, Russia or China would
likely veto any attempt to apply sanctions on Iran. A high-ranking
Chinese official has just publicly announced that Iran is to become
China's major trading partner. Russia has a heavy investment in
Iran's nuclear facilities. President George W. Bush is about to
have his bubble of delusions pricked. We are not the world's only
superpower, and there are plenty of people who don't jump when Bush
snaps his fingers.
As for the
Israelis, they would attack Iran in a New York second if
they had the capability, and I don't believe they do. If they take
a northern route, they will need permission from Turkey to use its
airspace. They won't get it. If they fly to the south through airspace
we control, they would need our permission, and that's not at all
certain. Moreover, they don't have the planes capable of taking
enough ordnance to do sufficient damage to fortified, underground
installations that are widely dispersed.
Iran, despite
its problems, is not without the means to retaliate, whether attacked
by Israel or the U.S. One thing the Iranians might do is wreck the
oil facilities in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, as well as closing the
valves on their own oil. This would throw the world oil market into
chaos, and the world economy would quickly follow.
Bush and Vice
President Dick Cheney are far too close to the oil industry to risk
that kind of worldwide economic train wreck.
Presumably,
we didn't want Israel to have the bomb, but the Israelis built them
anyway. Ditto Pakistan, India and North Korea. In the end, despite
the hot rhetoric, if the Iranians want a bomb, they will probably
end up building it. That might cause the Israelis to lose a little
sleep though not much, as they have 200 nuclear weapons
but it shouldn't bother us in the least.
The
Iranians are just as sensible and levelheaded as anyone else. Don't
buy the propaganda that they are all a bunch of crazies. They've
been around a lot longer than we have. I would trust them with nuclear
weapons as much as perhaps even a hair more than I
trust Bush. Americans must stop allowing politicians and propagandists
to scare them into reckless behavior.
January
21, 2006
Charley
Reese [send
him mail] has been a journalist for 49 years.
©
2006 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.
Charley
Reese Archives
|