Swine Flu: Natural Pandemic or Man-Made Pandemonium?
by Lila Rajiva
by Lila Rajiva
Recently
by Lila Rajiva: Anti-Sinitism...and
All That
The latest
in the barrage of media reports on swine flu is a Bloomberg news
report (August 25, 2009) that it might hospitalize 1.8 million patients
in the US and over-burden hospital intensive care units.
This comes
from a planning scenario released by the President's Council
of Advisers on Science and Technology
The Bloomberg
story cites some theatrical numbers:
- Half of
the US population infected (that is, over 150 million people)
- 300,000
people in hospital intensive care units
- 3090,000
people dead
- By-pass
surgery emergency operations disrupted
But hidden
in paragraph 5 of the Bloomberg piece is the most pertinent part:
These numbers
are only "scenario projections" that were "developed from models
put together for planning purposes only," says a Centers for Disease
Control spokesman.
So.
- Statistical
projections.
- Projections
from models of past pandemics. (And not the past, as in
1968 or 1957, but way back, as in 1918.)
- Projections
developed for planning purposes only.
That's three
stages removed from anything you could call reality.
But perish
this tenuous link with facts, PCAST wants Obama to rush through
vaccine production so that 40 million people can be infect
er injected by mid-September.
And who should
make that decision?
A doctor? The
surgeon-general? A medical team?
Why, the homeland
security adviser!
That's John
Brennan, a former CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia, deputy executive
director of the CIA under George Tenet, and the director of the
National Counterterrorism Center (CTC) from 2004 to 2005 during
the exact period when the CIA became most heavily involved in torture
practices in Iraq and elsewhere.
(Question:
Why not Janet Napolitano, Secretary for Homeland Security?)
Item: The
results of the first trials of the vaccines will be available only
in mid-October...
Item: According
to UK's Daily Mail, a letter was sent by the UK government
to about 600 neurologists on July 29 expressing concern that the
vaccine itself could cause serious complications, specifically,
the deadly nerve disease Guillain-Barre syndrome. GBS was one of
the side-effects when a similar swine-flu vaccine was used in the
United States in 1976.
Item: More
people died from vaccine-induced GBS than from the 1976 flu.
Item:
The current vaccine, which is going to be given to children, hasn't
been specifically tested on infants.
Question:
Why the rush?
Also hidden
way, way down in the Bloomberg piece is the opinion of the
chief medical officer of a New Jersey university hospital. He says
the PCAST estimates are "overblown."
Also hidden
is the admission that normal flu season kills about 36,000 people
anyway. And that the normal flu shot is taken by 100 million people.
Question:
Then why all the hysteria?
The answer
seems to boil down to two things:
- H1N1 targets
healthier and younger (1217 years) people.
- H1N1 seems
related to the Spanish flu of 1918, which, reportedly, killed
50 million people a flu that was displaced by other strains
some fifty plus years ago.
(Note: What
caused the deaths is not undisputed).
On the surface,
at least, it looks like we've got ourselves a plague not seen around
for half a century... and it goes in for kids.
Talk about
intelligent design. If someone wanted a Friday-the-13th horror story
to stir up panic in the population, they couldn't have done better.
Children are
already the easiest part of the population to target. Mom and dad
might not scare on their own behalf, but let junior sneeze and every
parental gene jumps into action.
How hard is
it for the government to get involved when most of a child's life
is lived on government property anyway, under the eye of government
employees teachers, counselors, nurses, principals, supervisors?
Still, it's
a giant step from finding something suspicious to proving it's fraudulent.
And that goes double when the thing you suspect is a virus. But
while we should hesitate to play amateur virologist, there's no
reason at all why we shouldn't question the bureaucrats behind the
viruses.
Who are
they and what's in it for them?
The first part
is easily answered.
The President's
Council of Advisers on Science and Technology, the creators
of the swine-flu scenario, has three co-chairs:
1. John Holdren
(Director, White House Office of Science & Technology)
2. Eric Lander,
head of the Broad Institute (MIT)
3. Harold Varmus
(CEO of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Center, NY)
A little digging
fills in the details.
1. John
Holdren:
Holdren isn't
just any old scientist. He's a climate change expert who
holds the Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy
at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government
(The 'Teresa'
is, of course, John Kerry's wife when she was spouse of Ketchup
king, John Heinz)
The support
for climate change policies goes hand in hand with support for nuclear
technology, which Holdren believes is needed for those policies.
He also believes all nuclear energy should be under the monitoring
of the International Atomic Energy.
Note: Climate
change and "peaceful nukes" have been the beneficiaries of a huge
PR effort over the last twenty odd years, largely stemming from
the Pentagon, specifically, from Andrew Marshall, a charismatic
theorist of American dominance whose Office of Net Assessments
is the most influential outfit you never heard of.
This PR typically
derides any dissent from climate orthodoxy and downplays the enormous
costs and risks involved in the global move to nuclear energy. It
also involves a lot of fear-mongering over states with "ancient
rivalries" (read, India-Pakistan, Israel-Palestine) that carries
a sub-text of racial anxiety. The underlying horror is masses of
starving people (read, brown and black people) threatening the resource-rich
(read whites).
That's also
the subtext of much population alarmism, including Holdren's.
As early as
1969 Holdren teamed up with neo-Malthusian doomsdayer Paul Ehrlich
to advocate population control to "fend off the misery to come."
In 1977, he and Ehrlich, as well as Anne H. Ehrlich, co-authored
a textbook ("Ecoscience"), in which they discussed "a wide variety
of solutions to overpopulation from voluntary family planning to
enforced population controls."
Ehrlich, with
whom Holdren associated until as late as 2003, is known to have
advocated compulsory birth control and to have been part of FAIR,
deemed a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. (To be fair
to Ehrlich, some people think the SPLC is something of a hate-monger
itself.)
For a run-down
of the most alarming comments in "Ecoscience," check this
webpage.
"Ecoscience"
approvingly describes a "planetary regime" that would use a "global
police force" to actively control people who "contribute to social
deterioration."
An example
of Holdren's eco-alarmism:
In 2006 he
claimed that global sea levels could rise by 13 feet by the end
of the century, whereas the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change) 4th Assessment Report (2007) suggested a potential rise
in the same period 0.61.9 feet.
2. Eric
Lander:
Lander's work
is also suggestive. The Broad Institute, which he heads, has for
its goal the mapping of the human genome, with an eye to linking
specific genetic markers to diseases in the population.
Put that next
to the ongoing rush to digitalize medical information, the rapid
development of an "electronic police state" in the US, and the increasing
dominance of the insurance industry over all markets (recall the
global fall-out when insurance giant AIG threatened to collapse),
and you have to wonder whether health insurers wouldn't find genetic
markers very, very useful in creating insurance policies...and whether
Homeland Security couldn't find uses for that information too.
3. Harold
Varmus:
The third co-chair,
Harold Varmus, is a Nobel Prize winner in Physiology who's also
done work in genetics. As director of the National Institute of
Health, Varmus is credited with doubling its budget
More worrisome,
Varmus is on the advisory board of something called the Campaign
to Defend the Constitution, a group that actively opposes the influence
of the religious right on science and policy. He's also on the board
of "Scientists and Engineers for America" (SEA), another group which
advocates for "sound science."
But though
SEA is a non-profit and calls itself non-partisan, it appears to
be no more than a revamp of an outfit created in 2004 to support
John Kerry's election.
["Scientists
and Engineers for Change" please note the word, "change."]
SEA is far
from being non-ideological.
As Wesley Smith
writing in The Weekly Standard (October 5, 2006) noted:
"It [SEA] further
demands that the government "remove inappropriate limits on stem
cell research," meaning dramatic increases in NIH grants for ESCR
and public funding of human-cloning research. It urges that public
policy "promote new partnerships between government-funded researchers
and industry, including the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors"
in other words, time to ratchet up the corporate welfare! And
it seeks "an aggressive program of research and innovation incentives,"
to promote more efficient energy use, which would, not coincidentally,
provide substantial financial benefits to an increasingly powerful
science-industrial complex." ("A New Political Action Committee
Enters the Fray")
Most intriguingly,
SEA is affiliated with another non-profit, the SEA Action Fund,
which is headed up by Michael Stebbins, a bio-weapons expert.
Stebbins is also on the Obama team, as a liaison to the science
and technology committee.
Bottom line:
The Obama "objective science" team has at least two proven ideologues
with axes to grind.
It gets more
unsettling.
The week before
PCAST came up with its H. G. Wells scenario, Varmus was taking part
in a Brookings Institution forum on policies to advance science
and technology.
The forum was
attended by Robert Rubin, Treasury Secretary under Bill Clinton,
and Rubin's protιgι, Lawrence Summers, chief Obama economic adviser,
a former President of Harvard (where PCAST co-chair Holdren teaches)
and a former Treasury Secretary, also under Bill Clinton,
Rubin is Mr.
Wall Street, ex co-chair of kleptocrat megabank, Goldman Sachs,
and ex-chairman of corrupt drug money launderer, Citigroup, a man
as responsible as anyone for the deregulation of the financial industry
and the consolidation of the banks that snow-balled a crisis of
cheap money into a global depression, a man who never met a door
he couldn't revolve through, a man who's bailed out of enough corporate-state
ships to sink an armada.
Summers, for
his part, defends the perfect economic logic of dumping the toxic
waste of multinational corporations in Africa.
The outfit
that put these power players together, the Hamilton Project,
also deserves scrutiny.
HP is the brainchild
of its co-chairmen, Bob the Bailer, and another revolving banker
of high caliber, Roger Altman, CEO of Evercore, a boutique investment
bank.
Altman has
had stints at Lehman Brothers (before and after its merger with
Shearson) as well as at Treasury, first as an assistant secretary
and then as deputy secretary (under Clinton). He's been an adviser
of both John Kerry and Hillary Clinton. In fact, he resigned from
Treasury after admitting he tipped off the Clintons about criminal
referrals arising from an investigation into the Clintons' Whitewater
investments.
In other words,
Altman is not only a Wall Street insider, he's a Clinton confidante.
Also telling
is the fact that Altman has headed up Mergers & Acquisitions
and international outreach for the secretive and huge private-equity
firm, Blackstone.
Blackstone,
as Wall Street watchers know, has a strange way of sneaking into
just about everything going on of any importance.
[An aside:
Blackstone's CEO is Pete Peterson, commerce secretary under
Reagan and also the creator of the Peterson Foundation, the Peterson
Institute, and the Concord Coalition. All three outfits present
themselves as disinterested policy advocates, but all three betray
a focus on budgetary issues that just happens to tally wondrously
with Peterson's own financial advantage].
Besides Altman's
ties with Blackstone, the Hamilton Project has another link
with Peterson. Along with Obama economic adviser and former Federal
Reserve chairman, Paul Volcker, Rubin is a vice-chairman of Peterson's
Concord Coalition, which gave him its Economic Patriotism award
in 2006.
How are any
of these ties relevant to swine flu?
Both Blackstone
and Evercore have powerful ties to big pharma.
I. Blackstone:
Blackstone
entered the huge Indian drug market in 2006, buying shares in Emcure,
which produces antiretroviral drugs, antiviruses and antibiotics.
Besides pharmaceuticals, Blackstone is also heavily invested in
hospitals, nursing homes, health insurance and health care packaging,
among other things. So while drug companies don't want Americans
buying cheaper generic drugs abroad, companies like Blackstone are
investing in foreign drug companies and profiting.
II. Evercore:
Evercore, which
Altman now heads, is a big player in the drug industry too.
In July (just
one month after swine-flu was declared a pandemic) Evercore concluded
its second multi-billion dollar health care deal of this year when
it advised leading vaccine maker Sanofi-Aventis (SASY. PA) in its
acquisition of the other 50% of Merial from joint owner, Merck.
Evercore's previous multi-billion dollar deal was advising Wyeth
on its acquisition by Pfizer, the biggest pharma deal of the year
when it took place.
Sanofi-Aventis
is described as the world's leading flu vaccine maker and is rushing
to create a swine-flu vaccine that it began testing on August 6.
Industry analysts
have noted that sales of swine-flu vaccine will add billions of
dollars to drug company revenues in 2009 and 2010. ("Sanofi-Aventis
Starts Swine Flu Shot Trials," Reuters, August 7, 2009).
Meanwhile,
the Sanofi-Aventis and Pfizer deals have pushed Evercore ahead of
Credit Suisse in volume of mergers & acquisitions in US rankings.
Both deals
were put through by Altman and a former Credit Suisse banker who
joined Evercore two years ago, after concluding some of the decade's
biggest health-care deals for clients like Johnson & Johnson,
Schering-Plough, Wyeth, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche Holding and Teva
Pharmaceutical.
("The Pharmaceuticals
Banker That Helped Evercore Land a $4 Billion Mandate," Deal Journal,
July 31, 2009)
Note: Roche
Holdings and GlaxoSmithKline are producers respectively of Tamiflu
and Relenza, two popular vaccines that retard the spread of swine-flu
in the body. The two companies have ramped up their production in
anticipation of the pandemic. ("The Quest for a Swine Flu Vaccine,"
BBC, April 29, 2009)
III. Big
pharma has its fingers in the Obama administration in another way.
Billy Tauzin,
the former Louisiana congressman, chief of Pharmaceutical Researchers
and Manufacturers Association (PhRMA), the biggest pharmaceutical
trade group, has recently managed to enlist Obama's support in protecting
drug prices. The White House has agreed to stymie congressional
efforts to allow drugs from Canada to be imported or bargain for
lower drug prices, among other concessions. In exchange, PhRMA has
agreed to cut $80 billion in projected costs to taxpayers over ten
years
("The White
House Deal with Big Pharma Undermines Democracy," Robert Reich,
Salon, August 10, 2009)
IV. And
where are the insurance companies in all this? The five largest
private health insurers and their trade association, lobbied Congress
to the tune of over $6 million in Q1 2009 alone.
("It's Robbery,"
Alternet, August 24, 2009).
It's not swine-flu
Americans should be worried about. It's swine-at-the-trough flu,
a much more lethal condition.
Symptoms
1. Infiltration
of the body politic by activists and unknown agents.
2. Extremism
about rising temperatures, feverish statements, and predictions
bordering on the delusional.
3. Monopolistic
conditions requiring constant monitoring.
4. Frequent
and massive collapses needing bailing out and mopping up by supervisors.
5. Ongoing
influenz(a)-peddling, symptomatic lobbying, and borderline-racketeering
disorder.
6. Reliance
on questionable and intrusive foreign bodies.
Diagnosis:
Moderate-Severe
Pandemonium
Aetiology:
Cases of pandemonium
often tend to be stirred up by government hacks, corporate flacks,
and welfare kings interacting with the media, causing acute inflammation
in the population. This one is no different.
Note:
One of Obama's chief flu-viators, the director of the Center
for Disease Control (CDC), Andrew Besser, left to become a correspondent
for ABC this past July.
Item:
The team that
wants to vaccinate tens of millions of people, with vaccines not
yet tested for safety, for a plague that even the government
admits is unpredictable consists of the following:
1. An environmental
and population alarmist with a forty-year track-record of making
apocalyptic predictions that are flat-out wrong. A guy who's spent
his whole life convinced that there are too many people, that people
are destroying the universe, and that we should actively reduce
the number of people on the planet.
2. Another
guy who's creating genetic ID's for people prone to disease a
genetic profiler whose work would be invaluable to health insurance
companies and to government surveillance.
An aside:
What if they come up with a gene for right-wing attitudes?
3. A third
guy who doesn't like religious values in public policy and works
with ideological and activist "science" groups, one of which is
affiliated with bio-weapons. A lobbyist for the science-industrial
complex.
4. One of the
top five miscreants of the global economic collapse, a big-time
Wall Street player responsible for using the government, first,
to consolidate the mega-banks; then, to bail those banks out when
they blundered; and finally, to eviscerate less powerful banks.
An insider with ties to the insurance industry.
5. Another
Wall Street and government player with a track record of consolidating
big pharmaceutical companies, several of which will directly profit
from the swine-flu scare. Also an insider with ties to the insurance
industry.
Prognosis:
In the scheme
of things, swine-flu is no more than a one-off bonanza for the drug
companies.
Far more lucrative
over the long-haul is the continuing and increasing use of vaccines
of all kinds, especially vaccines subsidized and pushed by the government.
Example:
In January 2009, the Department of
Health and Human Services awarded a $487 Million contract to Novartis
to make avian flu vaccine. Novartis is one of five companies (along
with GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi) that are making both seasonal and
swine-flu vaccines for the government.
Conclusion:
Just
as the avian flu scare ended up being a dry-run for the current
round of medical hysteria, the current panic will likely be most
significant as a dry-run for an expansion of the police state and
for greater consolidation of the big banks, big insurance, and big
pharma. In fact, that's just what Homeland Security adviser Brennan
said in remarks to the very influential Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) on August 6, 2009.
Quote:
"Our coordinated
response to the H1N1 virus across the federal government, with
state and local governments, and with the private sector and the
public and our extensive preparations for the coming flu season
will ensure that we are better prepared for any future bio-terrorist
attack."
Health care,
anyone?
Prescription:
Turn off the
TV, stay out of crowds, wash your hands often, drink plenty of water,
and if you do feel sick, check out Dr.
Grattan Woodson's website.
August
29, 2009
Lila Rajiva
[send her mail]
is the author of the ground-breaking study, The
Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the American Media (MR
Press, 2005), and the co-author with Bill Bonner of Mobs,
Messiahs and Markets (Wiley, 2007). Visit her
blog. All responses to email are posted at my blog in the comment
section after the relevant article, with personal information omitted
to ensure privacy.
Copyright
© 2009 Lila Rajiva
Lila
Rajiva Archives
|