The president
asked Congress last week to authorize new funding for the war
in Iraq, which was not paid for in the wasteful budget recently
passed in the House of Representatives. You might assume that
Congress would simply approve legislation that pays for military
supplies and hardware, troop wages, ammunition, fuel, food, and
the like. In other words, the bread and butter items that our
troops need to prosecute the war in Iraq.
But nothing
is simple in Washington. Congress could not resist the opportunity
to put its hands in taxpayers' pockets by adding 20 billion dollars
in completely unrelated spending to the final bill. In essence,
Congress is so addicted to spending that it will use any opportunity,
even a war, to spend money for every conceivable reason however
unrelated to the war in Iraq.
We must understand
that America is in a financial crisis. Tax revenues are down due
to the faltering economy, but congressional spending has exploded
by more than 22% in just two years. As a result, annual deficits
have risen rapidly, and the national debt now approaches 6.5 trillion
dollars. Almost all of this new spending has been completely unrelated
to homeland defense or national security concerns. The same old
failed domestic agencies and special-interest pork programs have
received the bulk of the dollars. While Congress should fund constitutional
federal functions like national defense, our very solvency as
a nation is being threatened by unconstitutional spending.
Here are
some examples of what ended up in the "war funding"
bill:
-
$3.2
billion for an airline bailout even though the airlines always
seem to be troubled and always feel they deserve tax money.
If we bail out the airlines, why not the hotels, restaurants,
and rental car agencies that have been affected by 9-11 and
the war in Iraq? Why not every industry that's suffering?;
-
$125
million for congressional security, to make sure members are
safe even if the country is not;
-
$11
million for salaries and expenses for the House of Representatives,
who already approved a pay raise for themselves last fall;
-
$250
million for Department of Agriculture grants;
-
$69
million for something called the Bill Emerson Humanitarian Trust;
-
$5.5
million for the Library of Congress;
-
$6.8
million for the Congressional Research Service and General Accounting
Office;
-
$100,000
for the U.S. Court of International Trade.
The bill
also includes $8 billion in foreign aid, which is especially egregious
given the state of the American economy. How can we ask taxpayers
to send billions abroad with things so tough for many here at
home?
The $8 billion
includes:
And the
list goes on and on. All of this is of course in addition to the
standard foreign aid we send these nations and many others every
year.
These
are just some examples of how Congress takes every possible opportunity
to spend your money, even when it should be focused on the war
in Iraq. Was it really too much to ask for a clean bill to fund
the president's request, a bill unencumbered by pork handouts
and useless foreign aid? Apparently not even war can prevent Congress
from shamelessly sticking its hands in your pockets while cloaking
itself in "support the troops' rhetoric.
April
9, 2003