|
The Austrian School and the Meltdown
by
Ron Paul
by Ron Paul
DIGG THIS
The financial
meltdown the economists of the Austrian School predicted has arrived.
We are in this
crisis because of an excess of artificially created credit at the
hands of the Federal Reserve System. The solution being proposed?
More artificial credit by the Federal Reserve. No liquidation of
bad debt and malinvestment is to be allowed. By doing more of the
same, we will only continue and intensify the distortions in our
economy – all the capital misallocation, all the malinvestment –
and prevent the market's attempt to re-establish rational pricing
of houses and other assets.
Last night
the president addressed the nation about the financial crisis. There
is no point in going through his remarks line by line, since I'd
only be repeating what I've been saying over and over – not just
for the past several days, but for years and even decades.
Still, at least
a few observations are necessary.
The president
assures us that his administration "is working with Congress to
address the root cause behind much of the instability in our markets."
Care to take a guess at whether the Federal Reserve and its money
creation spree were even mentioned?
We are told
that "low interest rates" led to excessive borrowing, but we are
not told how these low interest rates came about. They were a deliberate
policy of the Federal Reserve. As always, artificially low interest
rates distort the market. Entrepreneurs engage in malinvestments
– investments that do not make sense in light of current resource
availability, that occur in more temporally remote stages of the
capital structure than the pattern of consumer demand can support,
and that would not have been made at all if the interest rate had
been permitted to tell the truth instead of being toyed with by
the Fed.
Not a word
about any of that, of course, because Americans might then discover
how the great wise men in Washington caused this great debacle.
Better to keep scapegoating the mortgage industry or "wildcat capitalism"
(as if we actually have a pure free market!).
Speaking about
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the president said: "Because these companies
were chartered by Congress, many believed they were guaranteed by
the federal government. This allowed them to borrow enormous sums
of money, fuel the market for questionable investments, and put
our financial system at risk."
Doesn't that
prove the foolishness of chartering Fannie and Freddie in the first
place? Doesn't that suggest that maybe, just maybe, government may
have contributed to this mess? And of course, by bailing out Fannie
and Freddie, hasn't the federal government shown that the "many"
who "believed they were guaranteed by the federal government" were
in fact correct?
Then come the
scare tactics. If we don't give dictatorial powers to the Treasury
Secretary "the stock market would drop even more, which would reduce
the value of your retirement account. The value of your home could
plummet." Left unsaid, naturally, is that with the bailout and all
the money and credit that must be produced out of thin air to fund
it, the value of your retirement account will drop anyway, because
the value of the dollar will suffer a precipitous decline. As for
home prices, they are obviously much too high, and supply and demand
cannot equilibrate if government insists on propping them up.
It's the same
destructive strategy that government tried during the Great Depression:
prop up prices all costs. The Depression went on for over a decade.
On the other hand, when liquidation was allowed to occur in the
equally devastating downturn of 1921, the economy recovered within
less than a year.
The president
also tells us that Senators McCain and Obama will join him at the
White House today in order to figure out how to get the bipartisan
bailout passed. The two senators would do their country much more
good if they stayed on the campaign trail debating which one is
the bigger celebrity, or whatever it is that occupies their attention
these days.
F.A. Hayek
won the Nobel Prize for showing how central banks' manipulation
of interest rates creates the boom-bust cycle with which we are
sadly familiar. In 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression,
he described the foolish policies being pursued in his day – and
which are being proposed, just as destructively, in our own:
Instead of
furthering the inevitable liquidation of the maladjustments brought
about by the boom during the last three years, all conceivable
means have been used to prevent that readjustment from taking
place; and one of these means, which has been repeatedly tried
though without success, from the earliest to the most recent stages
of depression, has been this deliberate policy of credit expansion….
To combat
the depression by a forced credit expansion is to attempt to cure
the evil by the very means which brought it about; because we
are suffering from a misdirection of production, we want to create
further misdirection – a procedure that can only lead to a much
more severe crisis as soon as the credit expansion comes to an
end…. It is probably to this experiment, together with the attempts
to prevent liquidation once the crisis had come, that we owe the
exceptional severity and duration of the depression.
The only thing
we learn from history, I am afraid, is that we do not learn from
history.
The very people
who have spent the past several years assuring us that the economy
is fundamentally sound, and who themselves foolishly cheered the
extension of all these novel kinds of mortgages, are the ones who
now claim to be the experts who will restore prosperity! Just how
spectacularly wrong, how utterly without a clue, does someone have
to be before his expert status is called into question?
Oh,
and did you notice that the bailout is now being called a "rescue
plan"? I guess "bailout" wasn't sitting too well with the American
people.
The very people
who with somber faces tell us of their deep concern for the spread
of democracy around the world are the ones most insistent on forcing
a bill through Congress that the American people overwhelmingly
oppose. The very fact that some of you seem to think you're supposed
to have a voice in all this actually seems to annoy them.
I continue
to urge you to contact your representatives and give them a piece
of your mind. I myself am doing everything I can to promote the
correct point of view on the crisis. Be sure also to educate yourselves
on these subjects – the Campaign
for Liberty blog is an excellent place to start. Read the posts,
ask questions in the comment section, and learn.
H.G. Wells
once said that civilization was in a race between education and
catastrophe. Let us learn the truth and spread it as far and wide
as our circumstances allow. For the truth is the greatest weapon
we have.
See
the Ron Paul File
September
26, 2008
Dr. Ron
Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
Ron
Paul Archives
|