We were warned,
and in the early years of our Republic, we heeded that warning.
Today, though, we are entangled in everyone’s affairs throughout
the world, and we are less safe as a result. The current Middle-East
crisis is one that we helped create, and it is typical of how
foreign intervention fails to serve our interests. Now we find
ourselves smack-dab in the middle of a fight that will not soon
end. No matter what the outcome, we lose.
By trying
to support both sides we, in the end, will alienate both sides.
We are forced, by domestic politics here at home, to support Israel
at all costs, with billions of dollars of aid, sophisticated weapons,
and a guarantee that America will do whatever is necessary for
Israel’s security.
Political
pressure compels us to support Israel, but it is oil that prompts
us to guarantee security for the western puppet governments of
the oil-rich Arab nations.
Since the
Israeli-Arab fight will not soon be resolved, our policy of involving
ourselves in a conflict unrelated to our security guarantees that
we will suffer the consequences.
What a choice!
We must choose between the character of Arafat versus that of
Sharon.
The information
the average American gets from the major media outlets, with their
obvious bias, only makes the problem worse. Who would ever guess
that the side that loses seven people to every one
on the other side is portrayed as the sole aggressor and condemned
as terrorists? We should remember that Palestinian deaths are
seen by most Arabs as being American-inspired, since our weapons
are being used against them, and they’re the ones whose land has
been continuously taken from them.
Yet there
are still some in this country who can’t understand why many in
the Arab/Muslim world hate America.
Is it any
wonder that the grassroots people in Arab nations, even in Kuwait,
threaten their own governments that are totally dominated by American
power and money?
The arguments
against foreign intervention are many. The chaos in the current
Middle-East crisis should be evidence enough for all Americans
to reconsider our extensive role overseas and reaffirm the foreign
policy of our early leaders a policy that kept us out of the
affairs of others.
But here
we are in the middle of a war that has no end and serves only
to divide us here at home, while the unbalanced slaughter continues
with tanks and aircraft tearing up a country that does not even
have an army.
It is amazing
that the clamor of support for Israel here at home comes from
men of deep religious conviction in the Christian faith, who are
convinced they are doing the Lord’s work. That, quite frankly,
is difficult for me as a Christian to comprehend. We need to remember
the young people who will be on the front lines when the big war
starts which is something so many in this body seem intent on
provoking.
Ironically,
the biggest frustration in Washington, for those who eagerly resort
to war to resolve differences, is that the violence in the Middle
East has delayed plans for starting another war against Iraq.
Current policy
prompts our government on one day to give the go-ahead to Sharon
to do what he needs to do to combat terrorism (a term that now
has little or no meaning); on the next day, however, our government
tells him to quit, for fear that we may overly aggravate our oil
pals in the Arab nations and jeopardize our oil supplies. This
is an impossible policy that will inevitably lead to chaos.
Foreign interventionism
is bad for America. Special interests control our policies, while
true national security is ignored. Real defense needs, the defense
of our borders, are ignored, and the financial interests of corporations,
bankers, and the military-industrial complex gain control and
the American people lose.
It’s costly,
to say the least. Already our military budget has sapped domestic
spending and caused the deficit to explode. But the greatest danger
is that one day these contained conflicts will get out of control.
Certainly the stage is set for that to happen in the Middle East
and south central Asia. A world war is a possibility that should
not be ignored. Our policy of subsidizing both sides is ludicrous.
We support Arabs and Jews, Pakistanis and Indians, Chinese and
Russians. We have troops in 140 countries around the world just
looking for trouble. Our policies have led us to support Al Qaeda
in Kosovo and bomb their Serb adversaries. We have, in the past,
allied ourselves with bin Laden, as well as Saddam Hussein, only
to find out later the seriousness of our mistake. Will this foolishness
ever end?
A
non-interventionist foreign policy has a lot to say for itself,
especially when one looks at the danger and inconsistency of our
current policy in the Middle East.