New Hampshire’s 'First in the Fall' Debate Debacle
by Joseph P. Geiger,
Jr.
by Joseph P. Geiger, Jr.
DIGG THIS
Wednesday night’s
debate held at the University of NH revealed nothing substantially
new about the positions of the respective candidates. Certainly
some did better than others, but this was largely due to the sophomoric
and deviously Straussian behavior of those entrusted to neutrally
moderate the debate.
The prime story
of the night was the shamelessly brazen attempt by Fox News Channel
to assassinate the candidacy of Ron Paul and, to a lesser degree,
Mitt Romney. You may ask what these two candidates have in common.
The answer is not much; however, everyone by now knows that Ron
Paul maintains a traditionally conservative foreign policy of non-intervention.
Romney, on the other hand, refused to draw conclusions that no one
could validly draw yet concerning the success of the surge and the
Iraq war in general. Both were therefore placed on the firing line;
only Ron Paul dodged the bullets and defeated Fox’s childish antics
with sophisticated reasoning. While we all knew Fox News had neo-conservative
proclivities, one may not have known the ideologically zealous nature
of such views. The latter is now conspicuously obvious.
The assassination
began by ignoring Dr. Ron Paul for just about the first half hour
of the debate (not counting of course the irrelevant question asked
of all the candidates at the outset) while the candidates ordained
by the liberal media as frontrunners recited rehearsed answers to
questions they probably knew the content of before hand.
Then, when
the not so fair and balanced folk over at Fox News did get around
to asking Representative Paul a question or two, they either misrepresented
a position (airline pilots carrying handguns, CIA, FBI etc. inquiry,
marching orders question, interjection by Chris Wallace) that he
holds while stating the premise of the question or they giggled
and scoffed like third graders just before very serious issues were
to be discussed.
On a less substantive
level, the moderators commonly allowed the front-runners and most
conspicuously, Rudy Giuliani, to answer questions long after the
allotted time period expired, while strictly cutting off those they
consider rabble when the buzzer sounded.
With regard
to Mitt Romney, Fox news dipped to a new low by drafting a serviceman’s
parents to condemn a slip of the tongue that Romney already acknowledged
as such and that he already apologized for at length. Fox just had
no qualms stoning the repentant sinner, I suppose.
As for the
other GOP candidates, it was much of the same. John McCain was calm
and well spoken, but completely wrong. The success of the surge
is rather irrelevant being as though it is the larger issue of policy
and not the particular issues surrounding tactics and strategy that
are of primary concern. We need to reverse the foreign policy blunder
of the present administration, not exasperate it. And to suggest
that there is no need to sign Grover Norquist’s anti-tax pledge,
both Giuliani and McCain manifested an air of arrogance and aloofness
that can only but engender disdain, especially when you are on record
as having voted against tax cuts in the past. The rest of the lesser-known
candidates really just fail to distinguish themselves from the anti-constitutional
GOP status quo.
Fox News channel’s
behavior merits nothing but the most serious reproach and condemnation
and should be considered a gross violation of the news media’s purported
ethical obligation to be neutral. Their agenda was crystal clear
and sadly a very far cry from being conservative. From the station’s
loaded and lopsided questions to their rude and uncivilized behavior,
we can quite easily determine that Fox News wants Rudy Giuliani
(who is a traditional liberal in every sense of the word, save maybe
his preference for supply side economics) in the White House. And
I can only but figure that they want him there because, of all the
candidates in the field, they think he is most likely to win and
thereafter most likely to give them the war they so ardently desire
against Iran, and perhaps, Syria. And then to rescue all the social
conservatives who just jumped ship because a liberal got the nomination,
they want a servile Mike Huckabee in tote as Vice President, who
may want to bomb Iran more than Giuliani and even the neoconservatives
themselves.
All in all
Fox News disgraced themselves and revealed that they can’t even
get the mantle of conservatism off the ground as it has been dragging
in the dirt ever since they infiltrated the Republican revolution.
Constitutionalists are still without a major news media outlet,
but not without an advocate. Congratulations to Rep. Ron Paul of
Texas for answering the questions asked as honestly, civilly, and
rationally as possible notwithstanding the bullets of the establishment
GOP’s war machine.
September
13, 2007
Joseph
P. Geiger, Jr. [send
him mail] is a young NH based attorney and stay-at-home dad.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
|